Fitousi Daniel
Department of Psychology, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
J Vis. 2025 May 1;25(6):10. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.6.10.
The ability to process emotion in ensembles of faces is essential for social functioning and survival. This study investigated the efficiency and underlying architecture of this ability in two contrasting tasks: (a) extracting the mean emotion from a set of faces, and (b) visually searching for a single, redundant-target face within an ensemble. I asked whether these tasks rely on similar or distinct processing mechanisms. To address this, I applied the capacity coefficient-a rigorous measure based on the entire response time distribution. In Experiment 1, participants judged the average emotion of face ensembles. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants searched for a predefined emotional target among multiple faces. In both tasks, workload was manipulated by varying the number of faces in the display. Results revealed that ensemble averaging is a super-capacity process that improves with increased workload, while visual search is capacity-limited and impaired by greater workload. These findings suggest that averaging is a preattentive process supported by a coactive, summative architecture, whereas visual search is attention-dependent and governed by a serial or parallel architecture with inhibitory interactions between display items.
对面孔集合中的情绪进行处理的能力对于社会功能和生存至关重要。本研究在两项对比任务中调查了这种能力的效率和潜在架构:(a)从一组面孔中提取平均情绪,以及(b)在面孔集合中视觉搜索单个冗余目标面孔。我询问这些任务是依赖相似还是不同的处理机制。为了解决这个问题,我应用了容量系数——一种基于整个反应时间分布的严格测量方法。在实验1中,参与者判断面孔集合的平均情绪。在实验2和3中,参与者在多张面孔中搜索预定义的情绪目标。在这两项任务中,通过改变显示器中面孔的数量来操纵工作量。结果显示,集合平均是一个超容量过程,随着工作量增加而改善,而视觉搜索则受容量限制且因工作量增加而受损。这些发现表明,平均是一个由协同激活、累加架构支持的前注意过程,而视觉搜索依赖于注意力,并由显示器项目之间具有抑制性相互作用的串行或并行架构所支配。