Suppr超能文献

影响早期癌症治疗后抗PD-(L)1疗法再治疗的临床因素:一项改良德尔菲共识研究

Clinical factors influencing retreatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after treatment in early-stage cancers: a modified Delphi consensus study.

作者信息

Pusztai Lajos, Sondak Vernon K, Aguiar-Ibáñez Raquel, Cappuzzo Federico, Chouaid Christos, Elder Chris, Hirasawa Yosuke, Ishida Masaru, Jones Robert, Lee Seung Hyeun, Mizuno Ryuichi, Nagata Masayoshi, Okonji David, Parente Phillip, Shah Bhavesh, Sun Alexander, Ferreira Dominihemberg, Spiteri Carmel, Lauer Andrea, Kaliasethi Amrit, Kao Carol, Kothari Smita, McKendrick Jan

机构信息

Yale University Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Immunother Cancer. 2025 May 26;13(5):e011184. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-011184.

Abstract

Anti-programmed death (ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) therapies were first introduced in the metastatic setting and have since been approved and reimbursed for treating early-stage cancers in the adjuvant, perioperative, and neoadjuvant settings in many cancer types. Current evidence supporting anti-PD(L)-1 retreatment after relapse with prior neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant anti-PD(L)1 therapy is limited and inconclusive. There is no guidance for clinicians on how and when to retreat with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies when anti-PD-(L)1 therapy was administered in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting. This study aimed to reach consensus on factors to guide decision-making regarding retreatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after prior therapy with an anti-PD-(L)1 agent. This modified Delphi study consisted of a clinician survey across 10 countries followed by three real-time virtual Delphi panels involving clinical experts who had completed the survey. Clinical experts were experienced in using anti-PD-(L)1 treatments in early-stage cancers and/or as retreatment of patients with recurrences following early-stage treatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies. Of 28 clinicians providing survey responses, 20 participated in one of three Delphi panels. There was consensus that retreatment can be defined as 'repeated treatment with the same therapeutic class following relapse after or during neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment.' All three panels agreed that decisions around retreatment should consider 'prior immune-related adverse events/toxicity,' 'time-related factors' (eg, time since completion of full treatment course and since discontinuation) and 'previous patient response' (often referred to by clinicians as tumor response, which may have reflected their experience with metastatic disease). Other factors identified as important included country-specific practices, treatment availability, and reimbursement. Generally, the clinical experts considered that retreatment could be considered from ≥3 to 6 months after stopping initial anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, or from ≥6 months after relapse/recurrence. In conclusion, clinicians across different regions recognized a role for retreating patients with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after initial anti-PD-(L)1 treatment for early-stage cancers. Consensus was reached on some factors to consider regarding whether and when to retreat, although differences in clinical practice between countries/geographical regions made it difficult to achieve consensus for some more nuanced elements of retreatment. Further evidence could help better inform retreatment decisions.

摘要

抗程序性死亡(配体)1(抗PD-(L)1)疗法最初用于转移性癌症的治疗,此后已在许多癌症类型的辅助、围手术期和新辅助治疗中获批用于早期癌症治疗并纳入医保报销范围。目前,关于在新辅助和/或辅助治疗中接受过抗PD(L)-1治疗后复发时再次使用抗PD(L)-1治疗的证据有限且尚无定论。对于在新辅助和/或辅助治疗中使用过抗PD-(L)1治疗的患者,在复发时如何以及何时再次使用抗PD-(L)1治疗,临床医生尚无指导意见。本研究旨在就指导抗PD-(L)1药物先前治疗后再次使用抗PD-(L)1治疗决策的因素达成共识。这项改良的德尔菲研究包括对10个国家的临床医生进行调查,随后进行三场实时虚拟德尔菲小组讨论,参与讨论的是完成调查的临床专家。这些临床专家在早期癌症中使用抗PD-(L)1治疗和/或作为抗PD-(L)1疗法早期治疗后复发患者的再次治疗方面经验丰富。在提供调查回复的28名临床医生中,有20人参加了三场德尔菲小组讨论之一。大家达成的共识是,再次治疗可定义为“在新辅助和/或辅助治疗后或期间复发后,使用同一治疗类别进行重复治疗”。所有三个小组都同意,再次治疗的决策应考虑“先前的免疫相关不良事件/毒性”、“时间相关因素”(例如,自完成整个治疗疗程和停药以来的时间)以及“先前的患者反应”(临床医生通常称为肿瘤反应,这可能反映了他们对转移性疾病的经验)。其他被认为重要的因素包括特定国家的做法、治疗的可及性和报销情况。一般来说,临床专家认为,在停止初始抗PD-(L)1治疗后≥3至6个月,或在复发/再次出现后≥6个月,可以考虑再次治疗。总之,不同地区的临床医生认识到在早期癌症初始抗PD-(L)1治疗后,对患者再次使用抗PD-(L)1治疗的作用。对于是否以及何时再次治疗需要考虑的一些因素达成了共识,尽管国家/地理区域之间临床实践的差异使得在再次治疗的一些更细微的方面难以达成共识。更多证据可能有助于更好地为再次治疗决策提供依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7831/12107590/9da54262b5a3/jitc-13-5-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验