Exercise heart rates determined by a ventilatory threshold vs. standardized equation methods in individuals with metabolic syndrome.

This study aimed to compare the target heart rate (THR) for aerobic exercise based on standardized physiological maximum value percentages with the first-ventilatory-threshold heart rate (HR) in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Three HR prediction equations were used to calculate the THR as 35%, 40% and 45% of the heart rate reserve (HRR) and 55%, 60% and 65% of the HR, and the results were compared with the HR. The HR was measured through a CPET that complied with current guidelines and laboratory standards. In addition, the THRs calculated by combining the HR-measured values with standardized methods were compared with those of HR as a supplement for situations where HR-measured values can be evaluated but gas exchange analysis cannot be performed. According to the Fox equation, the difference between the HR and 35% HRR was not statistically significant (t = - 0.528, P = 0.600). Bland‒Altman analysis indicated that the mean difference between the two values was - 0.350, which was close to the 0th line (SD: ± 4.595; 95% CI - 1.684-0.984), with 95% limits of agreement ranging from - 9.356 to 8.656; the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.862 (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.766-0.920), indicating high reliability. Regarding the results, the measured values indicate that 40% HRR and 70% HR showed good reliability with HR (ICC: 0.850, 95% CI 0.747-0.913; and ICC: 0.719, 95% CI 0.551-0.832, respectively). Among Chinese patients with MetS, the THR calculated by combining the standardized 35% HRR method with the Fox equation shows excellent agreement with the HR obtained from the CPET. When the HR can be obtained, the THR calculated from the 40% HRR and 70% HR can better estimate the HR. The above results can be used to guide patients to gradually start exercise training near the VT1 in cases where CPET data cannot be obtained.