• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死后心源性休克发生率和死亡率的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Risk factors for cardiogenic shock incidence and mortality after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Maimaitiming Mailikezhati, Li Siwen, Huang Kepei, Maimaitiming Mulatijiang, Liu Feng, Smith Sidney C, Zheng Zhi-Jie, Jin Yinzi

机构信息

Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Institute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Commun Med (Lond). 2025 May 27;5(1):200. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00874-y.

DOI:10.1038/s43856-025-00874-y
PMID:40425745
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a serious complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), which could lead to severe health loss. This systematic review aimed to analyze the risk factors related to the incidence and poor outcomes of cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS), including in-hospital death, 30-day death and 1-year death.

METHODS

Original studies were systematically searched in PubMed and Embase up to November 2022. The summary odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of all studies were acquired based on a random effect model or fixed effect model. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to the study design, followed by sensitive analyses. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023466123).

RESULTS

There are 25 studies enrolled, including 12 cross-sectional studies, ten retrospective cohort studies, and three case-control studies. The pooled results reveal that female sex (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11), advanced age (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09), smoking (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.26-1.45), diabetes (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.08-1.82), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI; OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.34-2.63) are significantly associated with the development of AMI-CS. Among these factors, all except smoking increase the risk of in-hospital death among AMI-CS patients. Advanced age (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04-1.12) and diabetes (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.25-2.29) have negative impacts on 30-day death, while advanced age (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.70-2.50) and STEMI (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.15-1.95) are associated with 1-year death.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the significance of risk factors in predicting the incidence and prognosis of AMI-CS. Early identification and targeted interventions for individuals with these risk factors could potentially help prevent the occurrence of AMI-CS and improve patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

心源性休克(CS)是急性心肌梗死(AMI)的一种严重并发症,可导致严重的健康损失。本系统评价旨在分析与急性心肌梗死后心源性休克(AMI-CS)的发生率和不良结局相关的危险因素,包括院内死亡、30天死亡和1年死亡。

方法

截至2022年11月,在PubMed和Embase中系统检索原始研究。基于随机效应模型或固定效应模型获取所有研究的汇总比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。根据研究设计进行亚组分析,随后进行敏感性分析。该方案已在PROSPERO上注册(注册号:CRD42023466123)。

结果

共纳入25项研究,包括12项横断面研究、10项回顾性队列研究和3项病例对照研究。汇总结果显示,女性(OR,1.10;95%CI,1.09-1.11)、高龄(OR,1.06;95%CI,1.03-1.09)、吸烟(OR,1.36;95%CI,1.26-1.45)、糖尿病(OR,1.45;95%CI,1.08-1.82)和ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI;OR,1.99;95%CI,1.34-2.63)与AMI-CS的发生显著相关。在这些因素中,除吸烟外,所有因素均增加了AMI-CS患者的院内死亡风险。高龄(OR,1.08;95%CI,1.04-1.12)和糖尿病(OR,1.77;95%CI,1.25-2.29)对30天死亡有负面影响,而高龄(OR,2.10;95%CI,1.70-2.50)和STEMI(OR,1.55;95%CI,1.15-1.95)与1年死亡相关。

结论

我们的研究结果强调了危险因素在预测AMI-CS的发生率和预后方面的重要性。对具有这些危险因素的个体进行早期识别和针对性干预可能有助于预防AMI-CS的发生并改善患者结局。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for cardiogenic shock incidence and mortality after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性心肌梗死后心源性休克发生率和死亡率的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 May 27;5(1):200. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00874-y.
2
Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization Among Young Adults With and Without Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.心梗后伴有和不伴有心原性休克的青年患者的死亡率和心力衰竭住院率。
J Card Fail. 2023 Jan;29(1):18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Timing of mechanical circulatory support during primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Systematic review and meta-analysis.急性心肌梗死后机械循环支持时机与心原性休克:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar;99(4):998-1005. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30137. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
5
Revascularization Practices and Outcomes in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Who Presented With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock in the US, 2009-2018.2009-2018 年美国急性心肌梗死伴心原性休克多支冠状动脉疾病患者的血运重建实践和结局。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Oct 1;180(10):1317-1327. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3276.
6
Echocardiographic findings in cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction versus heart failure.超声心动图在急性心肌梗死后心原性休克与心力衰竭中的表现。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Aug 1;384:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.04.041. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
7
Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.美国急性心肌梗死合并非梗死相关心原性休克患者应用机械循环支持治疗的趋势和院内死亡率。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Apr;107(4):287-303. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1182-2. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
8
Cardiogenic Shock in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Versus Acute Myocardial Infarction: An 8-Year National Perspective on Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes.心尖球形综合征与急性心肌梗死所致心原性休克的临床特征、处理和预后的 8 年全国性观察研究
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;7(6):469-476. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 May 8.
9
Prognosis of cardiogenic shock with and without acute myocardial infarction: results from a prospective, monocentric registry.伴有和不伴有急性心肌梗死的心源性休克的预后:一项前瞻性、单中心注册研究的结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Apr;113(4):626-641. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02196-2. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
10
Cardiogenic Shock Among Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in a Middle Eastern Country: A Single-Center Experience.中东某国急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的心源性休克:单中心经验
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2023 Jan 20;34(4):232-240. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1323. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiogenic shock in women - A review and call to action.女性心源性休克——综述与行动呼吁
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 1;386:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 14.
2
Non-STEMI vs. STEMI Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Profile and Long-Term Outcomes.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死与ST段抬高型心肌梗死所致心源性休克:临床特征与长期预后
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):3558. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123558.
3
Sex Differences in Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Presenting With Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的管理和结局的性别差异。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Mar 28;15(6):642-652. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.12.033.
4
Incidence, Clinical Characteristics and Short-Term Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Various Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后不同左心室射血分数的心源性休克患者的发病率、临床特征及短期预后
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Mar 15;167:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.11.040. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
5
Cardiogenic Shock Among Patients with and without Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Latin American Country: A Single-Institution Study.拉美国家伴或不伴急性心肌梗死患者的心源性休克:单中心研究。
Glob Heart. 2021 Nov 30;16(1):78. doi: 10.5334/gh.988. eCollection 2021.
6
Cardiogenic Shock Complicating ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An 18-Year Analysis of Temporal Trends, Epidemiology, Management, and Outcomes.心源性休克并发ST段抬高型心肌梗死:18年时间趋势、流行病学、管理及结局分析
Shock. 2022 Mar 1;57(3):360-369. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001895.
7
Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Review.急性心肌梗死后心原性休克:综述。
JAMA. 2021 Nov 9;326(18):1840-1850. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.18323.
8
Epidemiology and causes of cardiogenic shock.心源性休克的流行病学和病因。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2021 Aug 1;27(4):401-408. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000845.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Sex bias in admission to tertiary-care centres for acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.急性心肌梗死和心原性休克患者收治于三级医疗中心的性别偏见。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Jul;51(7):e13526. doi: 10.1111/eci.13526. Epub 2021 Mar 7.