Suppr超能文献

网络跟踪中的性别差异:社交媒体中风险、控制和机会因素的作用

Gender Differences in Cyberstalking: The Roles of Risk, Control, and Opportunity Factors in Social Media.

作者信息

Lee Seong-Sik, Park Cheong Sun

机构信息

Department of Information Sociology, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea.

Department of Public Administration, Korean National Police University, Asan 31539, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 22;15(5):566. doi: 10.3390/bs15050566.

Abstract

This study empirically tests explanatory factors for cyberstalking on social networking services (SNS), especially focusing on gender differences in the effects of risk, control, and opportunity factors. In this study, we used lack of attachment and denial of victim as risk factors, morality and self-control as control factors, and anonymity as an opportunity factor. We predicted that the main risk effect for cyberstalking and the interaction effect between risk and control factors and between risk and opportunity factors can be differentiated by gender. It is hypothesized that the effects of lack of attachment and denial of victim as risk factors for cyberstalking would differ by gender. Furthermore, in the context of risk factors, we predicted that the moderating effect of the control factor would be greater for women, and the effect of the opportunity factor, such as anonymity, would be greater for men. The results of the analysis of cross-sectional data from 270 SNS using college students in Seoul, South Korea, generally supported the hypotheses. As a risk factor, the influence of lack of attachment was greater for men, while denial of victim was greater for women. The moderating effects of the control factors were greater for women in such a way that the interaction between denial of victim and morality was significant for women; while the moderating effect of the opportunity factor was greater for men in such a way that the interaction between lack of attachment and anonymity was more significant for men. This study finds that the risk factors of cyberstalking and the respective moderating effects of control and opportunity factors can be differentiated according to gender.

摘要

本研究实证检验了社交网络服务(SNS)上网络跟踪的解释因素,尤其关注风险、控制和机会因素影响方面的性别差异。在本研究中,我们将缺乏依恋和否认受害者作为风险因素,道德和自我控制作为控制因素,匿名作为机会因素。我们预测,网络跟踪的主要风险效应以及风险与控制因素之间、风险与机会因素之间的交互效应可以按性别区分。假设作为网络跟踪风险因素的缺乏依恋和否认受害者的影响会因性别而异。此外,在风险因素的背景下,我们预测控制因素的调节效应女性更大,而机会因素(如匿名)的效应男性更大。对来自韩国首尔大学生的270个社交网络服务的横截面数据的分析结果总体上支持了这些假设。作为一个风险因素,缺乏依恋对男性的影响更大,而否认受害者对女性的影响更大。控制因素的调节效应女性更大,表现为否认受害者与道德之间的交互作用对女性显著;而机会因素的调节效应男性更大,表现为缺乏依恋与匿名之间的交互作用对男性更显著。本研究发现,网络跟踪的风险因素以及控制和机会因素各自的调节效应可以按性别区分。

相似文献

2
3
Perceptions of Cyberstalking: Impact of Perpetrator Gender and Cyberstalker/Victim Relationship.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Apr;36(7-8):NP4074-NP4093. doi: 10.1177/0886260518784590. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
4
Correlates of Cyberstalking Victimization and Perpetration Among College Students.
Violence Vict. 2018 Dec;33(6):1036-1054. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.33.6.1036.
6
Elucidating College Students' Cyberstalking Victimization Experiences.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2024 Mar;27(3):208-213. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2023.0180. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
7
Cyberstalking Perpetrators and Their Methods: A Systematic Literature Review.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2025 Apr 24:15248380251333411. doi: 10.1177/15248380251333411.
8
Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Feb;17(2):61-7. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0231. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
9
The Relationship Between Offline and Online Stalking Victimization: A Gender-Specific Analysis.
Violence Vict. 2018 Aug;33(4):769-786. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-17-00121.
10
A Review of Statutes and the Role of the Forensic Psychiatrist in Cyberstalking Involving Youth.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2019 Jun;47(2):198-207. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003831-19. Epub 2019 Mar 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining Cyberstalking Perpetration and Victimization: A Scoping Review.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Jul;24(3):2019-2033. doi: 10.1177/15248380221082937. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
3
4
Unraveling the Roles of Distrust, Suspicion of Infidelity, and Jealousy in Cyber Dating Abuse Perpetration: An Attachment Theory Perspective.
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Feb;37(3-4):NP1432-NP1462. doi: 10.1177/0886260520927505. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
5
Justification beliefs of violence, myths about love and cyber dating abuse.
Psicothema. 2015;27(4):327-33. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2015.59.
6
Experiences of stalking in same-sex and opposite-sex contexts.
Violence Vict. 2014;29(6):1014-28. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-13-00072.
7
Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Feb;17(2):61-7. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0231. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
9
The relationship between young adults' beliefs about anonymity and subsequent cyber aggression.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Dec;16(12):858-62. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0009. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
10
The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: the moderating effect of peer rejection.
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 May;42(5):662-74. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9903-3. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验