Menni Alexandra, Tzikos Georgios, Goulas Patroklos, Chatziantoniou George, Vouchara Angeliki, Apostolidis Athanasios S, Ioannidis Aristeidis, Germanidis Georgios, Papazoglou Lyssimachos G, Giouleme Olga, Apostolidis Stylianos
1st Propaedeutic Department of Surgery, AHEPA University Hospital of Thessaloniki, 546 36 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Laboratory of General Pathology & Pathological Anatomy, Department of Pathology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Biomedicines. 2025 Apr 29;13(5):1079. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13051079.
: The potential side effects of the use of biological agents in the perioperative period are still under investigation. This animal prospective study aimed to evaluate the overall impact of biological factor administration after intestinal surgery. : This study included 80 female Wistar rats sorted into four groups: three groups received one of the biological factors, infliximab, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab; the control group received placebo therapy. After enterotomy and intestinal anastomosis, the bursting pressure (BP) of the anastomosis was compared among the groups on postoperative days (PODs) 3 and 7. : On POD3, the control group presented with a significantly higher mean BP (154.6 ± 39.7 mmHg) compared to the infliximab (66.8 ± 10.4 mmHg), vedolizumab (105.4 ± 37.6 mmHg), and ustekinumab (98.8 ± 47.9 mmHg) groups. A post hoc analysis among the three biological agent groups revealed differences only when comparing infliximab and vedolizumab rats with the controls on POD3 ( < 0.001) and with the ustekinumab rats on POD7, having a greater mean BP (282.5 ± 80.1 mmHg, = 0.031). No differences were observed regarding the event of broken anastomosis among the four groups. : This experimental study's findings highlight the varying detrimental effects of different biological agents on the strength of intestinal anastomosis, with ustekinumab demonstrating superior performance.
围手术期使用生物制剂的潜在副作用仍在研究中。这项动物前瞻性研究旨在评估肠道手术后给予生物因子的总体影响。本研究纳入80只雌性Wistar大鼠,分为四组:三组分别接受英夫利昔单抗、维多珠单抗或乌司奴单抗这三种生物因子之一;对照组接受安慰剂治疗。在进行肠切开术和肠吻合术后,比较术后第3天和第7天各组吻合口的破裂压力(BP)。在术后第3天,与英夫利昔单抗组(66.8±10.4 mmHg)、维多珠单抗组(105.4±37.6 mmHg)和乌司奴单抗组(98.8±47.9 mmHg)相比,对照组的平均BP显著更高(154.6±39.7 mmHg)。三种生物制剂组之间的事后分析显示,仅在术后第3天比较英夫利昔单抗和维多珠单抗组与对照组(P<0.001)以及术后第7天与乌司奴单抗组时存在差异,对照组平均BP更高(282.5±80.1 mmHg,P = 0.031)。四组之间在吻合口破裂事件方面未观察到差异。这项实验研究的结果突出了不同生物制剂对肠吻合强度的不同有害影响,其中乌司奴单抗表现出更优性能。