• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经尿道前列腺剜除术与经尿道前列腺激光剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生症:一项针对1368例病例的为期3年的希腊单中心回顾性比较队列研究。

MoLEP vs. HoLEP for BPH: A 3-Year Greek Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study on 1368 Cases.

作者信息

Veveloyiannis Panayiotis, Bafaloukas Nikolaos, Mouliou Dimitra S

机构信息

Minimal Invasive Urology Clinic MITERA Hospital HHG Group, 15123 Marousi, Greece.

Forth Urological Department, IASO Hospital, 15123 Marousi, Greece.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 10;17(10):1608. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101608.

DOI:10.3390/cancers17101608
PMID:40427111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12110212/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) is an established treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Pulse-modulated lasers, like MOSES technology (MoLEP), may enhance the procedure's efficiency and safety.

METHODS

A 3-year single-center retrospective comparative study was conducted on 1368 patients treated with HoLEP/MoLEP at MITERA Hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 688 patients were treated with HoLEP and 680 with MoLEP. Compared to HoLEP, MoLEP demonstrated shorter surgical (50.5 min [IQR 33-60] vs. 58 min [IQR 46-69], < 0.01) and enucleation times (34 min [IQR 23-43] vs. 43 min [IQR 34-51], < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (8 h [IQR 6-19] vs. 12 h [IQR 9-24], = 0.027), catheterization time (19 h [IQR 12-48] vs. 24 h [IQR 24-48], < 0.001), and irrigation duration (5 h [IQR 2-8] vs. 7 h [IQR 3-10], < 0.001), with similar morcellated tissue weight and morcellation time. At 1 month, MoLEP showed higher Qmax (27.3 mL/s [IQR 23.9-30.3] vs. 20 mL/s [IQR 17-23.6], < 0.001), lower PVR (11.4 mL [IQR 7.7-15] vs. 12.5 mL [IQR 7-18], = 0.005), better IPSS (4 [IQR 3-6] vs. 7 [IQR 5-11], < 0.005), QoL (1 [IQR 1-2] vs. 2 [IQR 1-2], < 0.001), lower PSA (1.8 ng/mL [IQR 1.1-2.6] vs. 2.4 ng/mL [IQR 1.3-3.5], < 0.001), which were maintained at 6 months, and fewer Clavien-Dindo I (2.5% vs. 7.5%, < 0.001) and II (16% vs. 25.7%, < 0.001) complications.

CONCLUSIONS

MoLEP offered significant advantages over HoLEP in this study.

摘要

背景

钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)是治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的一种成熟方法。脉冲调制激光,如MOSES技术(MoLEP),可能会提高该手术的效率和安全性。

方法

对在米特拉医院接受HoLEP/MoLEP治疗的1368例患者进行了一项为期3年的单中心回顾性比较研究。

结果

共有688例患者接受了HoLEP治疗,680例接受了MoLEP治疗。与HoLEP相比,MoLEP的手术时间(50.5分钟[四分位间距33 - 60] vs. 58分钟[四分位间距46 - 69],P < 0.01)和剜除时间(34分钟[四分位间距23 - 43] vs. 43分钟[四分位间距34 - 51],P < 0.001)更短,住院时间(8小时[四分位间距6 - 19] vs. 12小时[四分位间距9 - 24],P = 0.027)、导尿时间(19小时[四分位间距12 - 48] vs. 24小时[四分位间距24 - 48],P < 0.001)和冲洗持续时间(5小时[四分位间距2 - 8] vs. 7小时[四分位间距3 - 10],P < 0.001)也更短,碎组织重量和碎除时间相似。在1个月时,MoLEP的最大尿流率更高(27.3毫升/秒[四分位间距23.9 - 30.3] vs. 20毫升/秒[四分位间距17 - 23.6],P < 0.001),残余尿量更低(11.4毫升[四分位间距7.7 - 15] vs. 12.5毫升[四分位间距7 - 18],P = 0.005),国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)更好(4[四分位间距3 - 6] vs. 7[四分位间距5 - 11],P < 0.005),生活质量(QoL)更高(1[四分位间距1 - 2] vs. 2[四分位间距1 - 2],P < 0.001),前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)更低(1.8纳克/毫升[四分位间距1.1 - 2.6] vs. 2.4纳克/毫升[四分位间距1.3 - 3.5],P < 0.001),这些指标在术后6个月时仍保持,且Clavien-Dindo I级(2.5% vs. 7.5%,P < 0.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7999/12110212/2aeabe87999a/cancers-17-01608-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7999/12110212/2aeabe87999a/cancers-17-01608-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7999/12110212/2aeabe87999a/cancers-17-01608-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
MoLEP vs. HoLEP for BPH: A 3-Year Greek Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study on 1368 Cases.经尿道前列腺剜除术与经尿道前列腺激光剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生症:一项针对1368例病例的为期3年的希腊单中心回顾性比较队列研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 10;17(10):1608. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101608.
2
MOSES™ Technology vs Non-Moses Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Randomized Controlled Trial From a High-Volume Center.Moses 技术与非 Moses 钬激光前列腺剜除术:来自高容量中心的随机对照试验。
Urology. 2024 Jul;189:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.03.008. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
3
En Bloc enucleation with early apical release technique using MOSES (En Bloc MoLEP) vs. classic En Bloc HoLEP: a single arm study comparing intra- and postoperative outcomes.整块剜除术联合早期顶端松解技术(En Bloc MoLEP)与经典整块剜除术(HoLEP)治疗前列腺增生的单臂研究:比较围手术期结局
World J Urol. 2023 Jan;41(1):159-165. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04205-x. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
4
Does MOSES Technology Enhance the Efficiency and Outcomes of Standard Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate? Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.MOSES 技术是否能提高标准钬激光前列腺剜除术的效率和效果?系统评价和荟萃分析比较研究的结果。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Sep;8(5):1362-1369. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
Pulse modulation in En-Bloc HoLEP: does it really matter? A propensity score matched analysis.整块剜除前列腺术中脉冲调制的作用:真的有那么重要吗?一项倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 14;42(1):154. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04830-8.
6
Aquablation vs. holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a 150-patients prospective comparative multicenter study.水刀前列腺切除术与钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生症:一项纳入150例患者的前瞻性比较多中心研究。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2025 Feb;77(1):111-119. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05871-3. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
7
Same-day trial of void and discharge following standard vs. MOSES holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A single-center experience.标准与摩西钬激光前列腺剜除术后当日排尿及出院情况的试验:单中心经验
Can Urol Assoc J. 2023 Jan;17(1):E23-E28. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7983.
8
Holmium laser with MOSES technology (MoLEP) vs Thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) in a real-world setting. Mid-term outcomes from a multicenter propensity score analysis.钬激光联合 MOSES 技术(MoLEP)与铥光纤激光前列腺剜除术(ThuFLEP)治疗前列腺增生的真实世界研究:多中心倾向性评分分析的中期结果。
World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):2915-2923. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04524-7. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
9
[Plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia].[等离子体动力前列腺剜除术与钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生症的比较]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2018 Dec;24(12):1084-1088.
10
[Monoplane versu biplane holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia].[单平面与双平面钬激光前列腺剜除术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生症]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2020 Mar;26(3):242-249.

本文引用的文献

1
MOSES™ Technology vs Non-Moses Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Randomized Controlled Trial From a High-Volume Center.Moses 技术与非 Moses 钬激光前列腺剜除术:来自高容量中心的随机对照试验。
Urology. 2024 Jul;189:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.03.008. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
C-Reactive Protein: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, False Test Results and a Novel Diagnostic Algorithm for Clinicians.C反应蛋白:病理生理学、诊断、检测结果假阳性及面向临床医生的新型诊断算法
Diseases. 2023 Sep 28;11(4):132. doi: 10.3390/diseases11040132.
3
En Bloc enucleation with early apical release technique using MOSES (En Bloc MoLEP) vs. classic En Bloc HoLEP: a single arm study comparing intra- and postoperative outcomes.
整块剜除术联合早期顶端松解技术(En Bloc MoLEP)与经典整块剜除术(HoLEP)治疗前列腺增生的单臂研究:比较围手术期结局
World J Urol. 2023 Jan;41(1):159-165. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04205-x. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
4
Causal relationship between obesity, lifestyle factors and risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization study.肥胖、生活方式因素与良性前列腺增生风险之间的因果关系:单变量和多变量孟德尔随机化研究。
J Transl Med. 2022 Oct 29;20(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03722-y.
5
The Efficacy and Safety of HoLEP for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Large Volume: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.HoLEP 治疗大体积良性前列腺增生症的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Mens Health. 2022 Jul-Aug;16(4):15579883221113203. doi: 10.1177/15579883221113203.
6
Does MOSES Technology Enhance the Efficiency and Outcomes of Standard Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate? Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.MOSES 技术是否能提高标准钬激光前列腺剜除术的效率和效果?系统评价和荟萃分析比较研究的结果。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Sep;8(5):1362-1369. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
7
HoLEP: the new gold standard for surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.HoLEP:治疗良性前列腺增生的新金标准。
Can J Urol. 2021 Aug;28(S2):6-10.
8
Estimates of COVID-19 Risk Factors among Social Strata and Predictors for a Vulnerability to the Infection.不同社会阶层中新冠病毒病风险因素的估计以及感染易感性的预测因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 18;18(16):8701. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168701.
9
Epidemiology and treatment modalities for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.良性前列腺增生症管理的流行病学与治疗方式
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Oct;8(5):529-539. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.10.01.
10
BPH: Why Do Patients Fail Medical Therapy?良性前列腺增生症(BPH):患者为何会对药物治疗无效?
Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Jun 6;20(7):40. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0899-z.