Suppr超能文献

用于评估胶质瘤治疗的临床结局评估工具

Clinical Outcome Assessment Tools for Evaluating the Management of Gliomas.

作者信息

Chakravarti Sachiv, Gupta Sneha R, Myneni Saket, Elshareif Mazin, Rogers James L, Caraway Chad, Ahmed A Karim, Schreck Karisa C, Kamson David O, Holdhoff Matthias, Croog Victoria, Redmond Kristin J, Bettegowda Chetan, Mukherjee Debraj

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 14;17(10):1659. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101659.

Abstract

In recent times, a greater emphasis has been placed on framing patient clinical assessments and QOL as both endpoints and prognostic factors for neuro-oncological care. However, there is currently a lack of consensus on the most effective metrics and instruments for use in patients with primary brain tumors. Due to the heterogeneity in clinical characteristics, histological classification, anatomical location, and available treatment modalities for glioma, quantifying patient clinical condition and QOL within this unique population is particularly challenging. In this paper, we comprehensively review the available literature on the use of clinical assessment tools in glioma patients, highlighting the strengths and limitations of prominent instruments. We demonstrate that clinical outcome assessment (COA) instruments provide valuable and complementary insights into the physical, psychological, and spiritual well-being of glioma patients.

摘要

近年来,人们更加重视将患者的临床评估和生活质量作为神经肿瘤护理的终点指标和预后因素。然而,目前对于原发性脑肿瘤患者最有效的评估指标和工具尚无共识。由于胶质瘤患者在临床特征、组织学分类、解剖位置和可用治疗方式方面存在异质性,在这一独特人群中量化患者的临床状况和生活质量尤其具有挑战性。在本文中,我们全面回顾了关于胶质瘤患者临床评估工具使用的现有文献,突出了主要工具的优势和局限性。我们证明,临床结局评估(COA)工具为胶质瘤患者的身体、心理和精神健康提供了有价值的补充见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0e1/12110255/7ffc413dbd35/cancers-17-01659-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验