• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人结肠肿瘤的流式细胞术:通过去污剂技术进行细胞核分离。

Flow cytometry of human colorectal tumors: nuclear isolation by detergent technique.

作者信息

Petersen S E

出版信息

Cytometry. 1985 Sep;6(5):452-60. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990060510.

DOI:10.1002/cyto.990060510
PMID:4042785
Abstract

A simple one-step technique for detergent isolation and DNA staining of nuclei from mouse colon and from human colorectal tumors was investigated. Nuclear yield increased with treatment time, up to 24 h. There were only minor differences when detergent concentrations from 0 to 0.6% were used. The lowest (0.03%) concentration was most effective. No loss of nuclei was effected by cell lysis and no selectivity was observed for isolation of certain cell-cycle phases or ploidy classes from heterogeneous tumors. The nuclei were stable in the stain-detergent solution for 24 h, but lymphocytes were sensitive to the possible proteolytic activity of one of the two commercial RNase preparations. Of the total number of parenchymal nuclei in mouse liver, as estimated by a stereological method, approximately 60% were isolated by the procedure (approximately 0.9 X 10(8) nuclei/g tissue). From mouse colon the average nuclear yield was 1.8 X 10(8)/g, and from human colorectal tumors 0.9 X 10(8)/g (ranges 0.3-1.9 X 10(8]. Microscopic examination of undissolved tissue fragments from the preparation of tumors and mouse colon showed a high selectivity for isolation of epithelial and neoplastic nuclei, leaving the stroma with its nuclei almost intact.

摘要

研究了一种从小鼠结肠和人类结直肠癌肿瘤中分离细胞核并进行去污剂分离和DNA染色的简单一步技术。核产量随处理时间增加,最长可达24小时。使用0%至0.6%的去污剂浓度时只有微小差异。最低浓度(0.03%)最有效。细胞裂解未导致细胞核损失,并且在从异质性肿瘤中分离某些细胞周期阶段或倍体类别时未观察到选择性。细胞核在染色去污剂溶液中可稳定24小时,但淋巴细胞对两种商业核糖核酸酶制剂之一的可能蛋白水解活性敏感。通过体视学方法估计,小鼠肝脏实质细胞核总数中约60%可通过该程序分离(约0.9×10⁸个细胞核/克组织)。从小鼠结肠中平均核产量为1.8×10⁸/克,从人类结直肠癌肿瘤中为0.9×10⁸/克(范围为0.3 - 1.9×10⁸)。对肿瘤和小鼠结肠制备物中未溶解组织碎片的显微镜检查显示,该方法对上皮细胞核和肿瘤细胞核的分离具有高度选择性,使含有细胞核的基质几乎保持完整。

相似文献

1
Flow cytometry of human colorectal tumors: nuclear isolation by detergent technique.人结肠肿瘤的流式细胞术:通过去污剂技术进行细胞核分离。
Cytometry. 1985 Sep;6(5):452-60. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990060510.
2
DNA in situ sensitivity to denaturation: a new parameter for flow cytometry of normal human colonic epithelium and colon carcinoma.DNA原位变性敏感性:正常人结肠上皮细胞和结肠癌流式细胞术的一个新参数。
Cancer Res. 1987 Aug 1;47(15):3942-7.
3
A comparison between flow cytometric ploidy investigation and chromosome analysis of 32 human colorectal tumors.32例人类结肠直肠肿瘤的流式细胞术倍性研究与染色体分析的比较。
Cytometry. 1986 Jul;7(4):307-12. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990070403.
4
Preparation of cell nuclei from fresh tissues for high-quality DNA flow cytometry.从新鲜组织中制备细胞核用于高质量DNA流式细胞术。
Cytometry. 1993 Oct;14(7):793-804. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990140712.
5
A detergent-trypsin method for the preparation of nuclei for flow cytometric DNA analysis.一种用于制备细胞核以进行流式细胞术DNA分析的去污剂-胰蛋白酶法。
Cytometry. 1983 Mar;3(5):323-7. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990030503.
6
Flow cytometric studies of colorectal tumors using fine needle aspiration.使用细针穿刺对结直肠肿瘤进行流式细胞术研究。
Anticancer Res. 1987 May-Jun;7(3 Pt B):531-4.
7
Preparation of tissues for DNA flow cytometric analysis.用于DNA流式细胞术分析的组织制备。
Cytometry. 1980 Nov;1(3):229-37. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990010309.
8
Characteristics of colorectal epithelia and adenomas as revealed by DNA cytofluorometry.DNA细胞荧光测定法揭示的结肠直肠上皮和腺瘤的特征
Jpn J Cancer Res. 1987 Aug;78(8):826-32.
9
RNA and DNA content of isolated cell nuclei measured by multiparameter flow cytometry.通过多参数流式细胞术测量分离细胞核的RNA和DNA含量。
Cytometry. 1983 Jan;3(4):269-75. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990030407.
10
[Flow cytometry. Application to the study of cellular content of DNA in colorectal tumors].[流式细胞术。在结直肠肿瘤DNA细胞含量研究中的应用]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1988 Aug-Sep;12(8-9):629-36.