Fishlock Kathryn, Gibbons Shauna, Walton Karen, Kent Katherine, Lewis Meron, Charlton Karen E
School of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia.
School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 13;22(5):768. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22050768.
Amidst a period of sustained inflation and rising living costs, food insecurity is a growing concern in Australia and is correlated with poor diet quality and increased rates of non-communicable diseases. Currently there is a gap in knowledge of the impact of increasing cost-of-living pressures on the affordability of a healthy diet. As affordability plays a key role in food security, this cross-sectional study aimed to examine the costs, affordability, and differential of habitual (unhealthy) and recommended (healthy) diets within the Illawarra region of Australia and compare results to 2022 findings. The Healthy Diets Australian Standardised Affordability and Pricing tool was applied in six locations in the Illawarra, with two randomly selected each from a low, moderate, and high socioeconomically disadvantaged area. Costs were determined for three reference households: a family of four, a single parent family, and a single male. Affordability was determined for the reference households at three levels of income: median gross, minimum-wage, and welfare dependent. Data was compared to data collected in 2022 using the same methods and locations. Recommended diets cost 10.3-36% less than habitual diets depending on household type, but remained unaffordable for welfare dependant households and family households from socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, where diets required 25.5-45.9% of household income. Due to income increases, affordability of both diets has marginally improved since 2022, requiring 0.5-4.8% less household income. This study provides updated evidence that supports the urgent need for policies, interventions, and monitoring to widely assess and improve healthy diet affordability and decrease food insecurity rates. Possible solutions include increasing welfare rates above the poverty line and utilising nudge theory in grocery stores.
在持续通货膨胀和生活成本不断上升的时期,粮食不安全问题在澳大利亚日益受到关注,并且与不良饮食质量和非传染性疾病发病率上升相关。目前,对于生活成本压力增加对健康饮食可承受性的影响,人们的认识存在差距。由于可承受性在粮食安全中起着关键作用,这项横断面研究旨在调查澳大利亚伊拉瓦拉地区习惯性(不健康)饮食和推荐(健康)饮食的成本、可承受性以及差异,并将结果与2022年的研究结果进行比较。澳大利亚健康饮食标准化可承受性和定价工具应用于伊拉瓦拉的六个地点,从社会经济地位低、中、高不利地区各随机选取两个。确定了三个参考家庭的成本:一个四口之家、一个单亲家庭和一个单身男性。确定了参考家庭在三个收入水平下的可承受性:中位数总收入、最低工资和依赖福利。使用相同的方法和地点,将数据与2022年收集的数据进行比较。根据家庭类型不同,推荐饮食的成本比习惯性饮食低10.3%至36%,但对于依赖福利的家庭以及来自社会经济不利地区的家庭来说,仍然难以承受,这些家庭的饮食成本占家庭收入的25.5%至45.9%。由于收入增加,自2022年以来,两种饮食的可承受性略有改善,所需家庭收入减少了0.5%至4.8%。这项研究提供了最新证据,支持迫切需要制定政策、采取干预措施并进行监测,以广泛评估和提高健康饮食的可承受性并降低粮食不安全率。可能的解决方案包括将福利水平提高到贫困线以上,并在杂货店运用助推理论。