• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高收入国家的食品安全定义、措施和宣传重点:德尔菲共识研究。

Food security definition, measures and advocacy priorities in high-income countries: a Delphi consensus study.

机构信息

School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Woolworths Centre for Childhood Nutrition Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2023 Oct;26(10):1986-1996. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023000915. Epub 2023 May 5.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980023000915
PMID:37144401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10564592/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish an international consensus on the definition of food security, measures and advocacy priorities in high-income countries.

DESIGN

A two-round online Delphi survey with closing in March 2020 and December 2021. Consensus was set a priori at 75 %. Qualitative data were synthesised and priorities were ranked.

SETTING

High-income countries.

PARTICIPANTS

Household food security experts in academia, government and non-government organisations who had published in the last 5 years.

RESULTS

Up to thirty-two participants from fourteen high-income countries responded to the Delphi with a 25 % response rate in Round 1 and a 38 % response rate in Round 2. Consensus was reached on the technical food security definition and its dimensions. Consensus was not reached on a definition suitable for the general public. All participants agreed that food security monitoring systems provide valuable data for in-country decision-making. Favoured interventions were those that focused on upstream social policy influencing income. Respondents agreed that both national and local community level strategies were required to ameliorate food insecurity, reinforcing the complexity of the problem.

CONCLUSIONS

This study furthers the conceptual understanding of the commonly used definition of food security and its constituent dimensions. Strong advocacy is needed to ensure food security monitoring, policy and mitigation strategies are implemented. The consensus on the importance of prioritising actions that address the underlying determinants of household food security by experts in the field from across wealthy nations provides evidence to focus advocacy efforts and generate public debate.

摘要

目的

就高收入国家的食品安全定义、措施和宣传重点达成国际共识。

设计

两轮在线德尔菲调查,分别于 2020 年 3 月和 2021 年 12 月结束。事先设定的共识标准为 75%。对定性数据进行综合分析,并对重点进行排名。

地点

高收入国家。

参与者

在学术界、政府和非政府组织中从事家庭食品安全工作并在过去 5 年内发表过文章的专家。

结果

共有来自 14 个高收入国家的 32 名参与者对德尔菲进行了回复,第一轮的回复率为 25%,第二轮为 38%。就技术食品安全定义及其维度达成共识。对于适合公众的定义未达成共识。所有参与者都同意食品安全监测系统为国内决策提供了有价值的数据。优先考虑的干预措施是那些专注于影响收入的上游社会政策。受访者一致认为,需要国家和地方社区层面的战略来缓解粮食不安全问题,这突显了问题的复杂性。

结论

本研究深化了对常用食品安全定义及其构成维度的概念理解。需要大力宣传,以确保实施食品安全监测、政策和缓解战略。该研究结果表明,来自富裕国家的该领域专家一致认为,优先采取行动解决家庭食品安全的根本决定因素非常重要,这为集中宣传工作和引发公众讨论提供了证据。

相似文献

1
Food security definition, measures and advocacy priorities in high-income countries: a Delphi consensus study.高收入国家的食品安全定义、措施和宣传重点:德尔菲共识研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Oct;26(10):1986-1996. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023000915. Epub 2023 May 5.
2
Consensus from an expert panel on how to identify and support food insecurity during pregnancy: A modified Delphi study.专家小组就如何在怀孕期间识别和支持粮食不安全问题达成的共识:一项改良德尔菲研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 5;22(1):1231. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08587-x.
3
Maternal health equity in Georgia: a Delphi consensus approach to definition and research priorities.格鲁吉亚的孕产妇健康公平性:定义和研究重点的德尔菲共识方法。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;23(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15395-3.
4
International research priorities for integrated care and cross-boundary working: an electronic Delphi study.国际综合护理和跨境工作重点研究:电子德尔菲研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Oct 14;36(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae095.
5
Conceptual definition for drowning prevention: a Delphi study.溺水预防的概念定义:德尔菲研究。
Inj Prev. 2024 Mar 20;30(2):145-152. doi: 10.1136/ip-2023-045085.
6
Prioritising models of healthcare service delivery for a more sustainable health system: a Delphi study of Australian health policy, clinical practice and management, academic and consumer stakeholders.优先考虑医疗服务提供模式,以建立更具可持续性的卫生系统:对澳大利亚卫生政策、临床实践和管理、学术和消费者利益相关者的德尔菲研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):425-432. doi: 10.1071/AH20160.
7
What factors are associated with food security among recently arrived refugees resettling in high-income countries? A scoping review.哪些因素与高收入国家新抵达难民的粮食安全有关? 范围综述。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Sep;24(13):4313-4327. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021002925. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
8
A structured expert judgement elicitation approach: how can it inform sound intervention decision-making to support household food security?一种结构化专家判断启发法:如何为支持家庭粮食安全提供合理的干预决策?
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jun;24(8):2050-2061. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000525. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
9
Priorities and challenges in social and healthcare policies for older people living in the Mediterranean basin: A Delphi panel study.地中海盆地老年人社会和医疗保健政策的优先事项和挑战:德尔菲小组研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):845. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05430-2.
10
Interventions to address household food insecurity in high-income countries.解决高收入国家家庭粮食不安全问题的干预措施。
Proc Nutr Soc. 2018 Aug;77(3):270-281. doi: 10.1017/S002966511800006X. Epub 2018 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts of Food Insecurity on Child Development: Strengthening the Role of Childcare.粮食不安全对儿童发育的影响:强化儿童保育的作用。
Nutrients. 2025 Jul 25;17(15):2427. doi: 10.3390/nu17152427.
2
Affordability of Habitual (Unhealthy) and Recommended (Healthy) Diets in the Illawarra Using the Healthy Diets ASAP Protocol.运用“健康饮食 ASAP 方案”评估伊拉瓦拉地区习惯性(不健康)饮食和推荐(健康)饮食的可承受性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 13;22(5):768. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22050768.
3
Co-designing solutions to tackle food insecurity in higher education settings: a scoping review.共同设计解决高等教育环境中粮食不安全问题的方案:一项范围综述
Public Health Nutr. 2025 Apr 14;28(1):e80. doi: 10.1017/S1368980025000485.
4
Drivers and magnitude of food insecurity among rural households in southern Democratic Republic of Congo.刚果民主共和国南部农村家庭粮食不安全的驱动因素及程度
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 7;10(21):e40207. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40207. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
5
Food inequity and insecurity and MASLD: burden, challenges, and interventions.食物不平等和不安全与 MASLD:负担、挑战和干预。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Oct;21(10):668-686. doi: 10.1038/s41575-024-00959-4. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
6
Food Insecurity Is Associated with Diet Quality in Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study.孕期食物不安全与饮食质量有关:一项横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Apr 28;16(9):1319. doi: 10.3390/nu16091319.
7
A design thinking-led approach to develop a responsive feeding intervention for Australian families vulnerable to food insecurity: Eat, Learn, Grow.采用设计思维方法为易发生食物不安全的澳大利亚家庭开发一个灵活的喂养干预措施:吃、学、成长。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14051. doi: 10.1111/hex.14051.
8
A 5-year review of prevalence, temporal trends and characteristics of individuals experiencing moderate and severe food insecurity in 34 high income countries.34 个高收入国家中经历中度和重度粮食不安全个体的流行率、时间趋势和特征的 5 年回顾。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 9;23(1):2215. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17139-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Public infrastructure for food and nutrition security in brazil: fufilling the constitutional commitment to the human right to adequate food.巴西粮食和营养安全的公共基础设施:履行对充足食物权的宪法承诺。
Food Secur. 2022;14(4):897-905. doi: 10.1007/s12571-022-01272-1. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
2
Why the World Should Not Follow the Failed United States Model of Fighting Domestic Hunger.世界不应效仿美国打击国内饥饿的失败模式。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 12;19(2):814. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020814.
3
Food Insecurity and Child Development: A State-of-the-Art Review.食物不安全与儿童发展:最新综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):8990. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178990.
4
Health Promotion Glossary 2021.《2021年健康促进术语汇编》
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 23;36(6):1578-1598. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa157.
5
Feeding the food insecure in Britain: learning from the 2020 COVID-19 crisis.为英国粮食不安全人群提供食物:从2020年新冠疫情危机中吸取经验教训。
Food Secur. 2020;12(4):865-870. doi: 10.1007/s12571-020-01080-5. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Why time poverty matters for individuals, organisations and nations.为什么时间贫困对个人、组织和国家都很重要。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Oct;4(10):993-1003. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0920-z. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
7
Food Charity, Shame/ing and the Enactment of Worth.食品慈善、羞耻和价值的制定。
Med Anthropol. 2021 Jan;40(1):98-109. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2020.1776275. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
Food insecurity, food crimes and structural violence: an Australian perspective.粮食不安全、粮食犯罪与结构性暴力:澳大利亚视角
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020 Apr;44(2):87-88. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12977. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
A healthy, sustainable and safe food system: examining the perceptions and role of the Australian policy actor using a Delphi survey.健康、可持续和安全的食物系统:使用德尔菲调查研究澳大利亚政策参与者的认知和作用。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Nov;22(16):2921-2930. doi: 10.1017/S136898001900185X. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
10
Defining health and health inequalities.定义健康和健康不平等。
Public Health. 2019 Jul;172:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.023. Epub 2019 May 31.