Hsu Chia-Hao, Hsu Nin-Chieh, Lin Sung-Yen, Lu Cheng-Chang, Fu Yin-Chih, Huang Hsuan-Ti, Chen Chung-Hwan, Chou Pei-Hsi
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 100, Shih-Chuan 1st Road, Sanmin District, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.
Department of Orthopedics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, No. 100, Tzyou 1st Road, Sanmin District, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;12(5):444. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050444.
The pullout failure of conventional locking screws (LSs, screws with a locking mechanism) may occur in patients with osteoporosis, particularly when inserted near joints or across periarticular fractures (e.g., proximal humerus). The two-part locking cancellous screw modification (TP-LCS, screws composed of two parts) in metaphyseal cancellous bone is hypothesized to increase bone purchase and holding power. This study aimed to test the hypothesized advantages of TP-LCS over LSs. An MTS 370 series frame with an axial/torsional load cell was used to test driving torque and axial pullout strength, following ASTM F543-07 standards. The TP-LCS group featured a newly modified screw design made from titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), while conventional LSs (Synthes) were used for the control group. Statistical significance was assessed for selected comparisons relevant to the research objectives, including driving torque and axial pullout strength. The driving torque test showed that TP-LCS had a significantly higher maximum insertion torque (4.9 ± 0.4 N·cm) compared to LSs (4.2 ± 0.4 N·cm) ( = 0.0269), although no significant difference was found in maximum removal torque ( = 0.1046). The axial pullout test revealed that TP-LCS had significantly higher pullout strength (223.5 ± 12.2 N) compared to LSs (203.5 ± 11.5 N) ( = 0.0284). Failure during the axial pullout test often involved cracking of the test block material around the screw threads, causing the screw to pull out. These results support the hypothesis that TP-LCS may offer improved axial pullout resistance compared to LSs, making it a potentially beneficial modification for LSs in osteoporotic metaphyseal regions or near joints. This study provides biomechanical insights into the advantages of the modified screw design over conventional LSs.
传统锁定螺钉(LS,带有锁定机制的螺钉)在骨质疏松患者中可能会出现拔出失败的情况,尤其是当螺钉插入关节附近或跨越关节周围骨折部位(如肱骨近端)时。两部分锁定松质骨螺钉改良型(TP-LCS,由两部分组成的螺钉)用于干骺端松质骨,据推测可增加骨锚定和把持力。本研究旨在验证TP-LCS相对于LS的假设优势。按照ASTM F543-07标准,使用带有轴向/扭转测力传感器的MTS 370系列框架测试驱动扭矩和轴向拔出强度。TP-LCS组采用了一种新改良的由钛合金(Ti6Al4V)制成的螺钉设计,而对照组使用传统锁定螺钉(Synthes)。对与研究目标相关的选定比较进行统计学显著性评估,包括驱动扭矩和轴向拔出强度。驱动扭矩测试表明,与LS(4.2±0.4 N·cm)相比,TP-LCS的最大插入扭矩显著更高(4.9±0.4 N·cm)(P = 0.0269),尽管最大拆除扭矩未发现显著差异(P = 0.1046)。轴向拔出测试显示,与LS(203.5±11.5 N)相比,TP-LCS的拔出强度显著更高(223.5±12.2 N)(P = 0.0284)。轴向拔出测试过程中的失败通常涉及螺钉螺纹周围测试块材料的开裂,导致螺钉拔出。这些结果支持了以下假设:与LS相比,TP-LCS可能具有更好的轴向抗拔出能力,这使其成为骨质疏松干骺端区域或关节附近LS的一种潜在有益改良。本研究为改良螺钉设计相对于传统LS的优势提供了生物力学见解。