• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于常规可用临床信息的血管内血栓切除术术后90天死亡率预测机器学习模型的识别与患者获益评估

Identification and Patient Benefit Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting 90-Day Mortality After Endovascular Thrombectomy Based on Routinely Ready Clinical Information.

作者信息

Ng Andrew Tik Ho, Chan Lawrence Wing Chi

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Apr 28;12(5):468. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050468.

DOI:10.3390/bioengineering12050468
PMID:40428087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12109170/
Abstract

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is regarded as the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the mortality rates for these patients remain alarmingly high. Dependable mortality prediction based on timely clinical information is of great importance. This study retrospectively reviewed 151 patients who underwent EVT at Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital between 1 April 2017, and 31 October 2023. The primary outcome of this study was 90-day mortality after AIS. The models were developed using two feature selection approaches (model I: sequential forward feature selection, model II: sequential forward feature selection after identifying variables through univariate logistic regression) and six algorithms. Model performance was evaluated by using external validation data of 312 cases and compared with three traditional prediction scores. This study identified support vector machine (SVM) using model II as the best algorithm among the various options. Meanwhile, the Houston Intra-Arterial recanalization 2 (HIAT2) score surpassed all algorithms with an AUC of 0.717. However, most algorithms provided a greater net benefit than the traditional prediction scores. Machine learning (ML) algorithms developed with routinely available variables could offer beneficial insights for predicting mortality in AIS patients undergoing EVT.

摘要

血管内血栓切除术(EVT)被视为患有大血管闭塞(LVO)的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的护理标准。然而,这些患者的死亡率仍然高得惊人。基于及时临床信息的可靠死亡率预测至关重要。本研究回顾性分析了2017年4月1日至2023年10月31日期间在东区尤德夫人那打素医院接受EVT治疗的151例患者。本研究的主要结局是AIS后90天死亡率。使用两种特征选择方法(模型I:顺序向前特征选择,模型II:通过单变量逻辑回归识别变量后进行顺序向前特征选择)和六种算法构建模型。通过使用312例病例的外部验证数据评估模型性能,并与三个传统预测评分进行比较。本研究确定,在各种选项中,使用模型II的支持向量机(SVM)是最佳算法。同时,休斯顿动脉内再通2(HIAT2)评分的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.717,超过了所有算法。然而,大多数算法比传统预测评分提供了更大的净效益。利用常规可用变量开发的机器学习(ML)算法可为预测接受EVT治疗的AIS患者的死亡率提供有益见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d20/12109170/5bd3e7259291/bioengineering-12-00468-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d20/12109170/29f638e6c23c/bioengineering-12-00468-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d20/12109170/5bd3e7259291/bioengineering-12-00468-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d20/12109170/29f638e6c23c/bioengineering-12-00468-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d20/12109170/5bd3e7259291/bioengineering-12-00468-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Identification and Patient Benefit Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting 90-Day Mortality After Endovascular Thrombectomy Based on Routinely Ready Clinical Information.基于常规可用临床信息的血管内血栓切除术术后90天死亡率预测机器学习模型的识别与患者获益评估
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Apr 28;12(5):468. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050468.
2
Optimizing Outcome Prediction Scores in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusions Using Collateral Grade on Computed Tomography Angiography.利用 CT 血管造影的侧支循环分级优化血管内血栓切除术治疗大血管闭塞患者的预后评分。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Sep 1;85(3):350-358. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy316.
3
Machine learning models improve prediction of large vessel occlusion and mechanical thrombectomy candidacy in acute ischemic stroke.机器学习模型提高了急性缺血性脑卒中大血管闭塞和机械取栓适应证的预测能力。
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Sep;91:383-390. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.07.021. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
4
Machine Learning-Based Model for Predicting Incidence and Severity of Acute Ischemic Stroke in Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion.基于机器学习的前循环大血管闭塞性急性缺血性卒中发病率和严重程度预测模型
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 2;12:749599. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.749599. eCollection 2021.
5
Machine learning models reveal the critical role of nighttime systolic blood pressure in predicting functional outcome for acute ischemic stroke after endovascular thrombectomy.机器学习模型揭示了夜间收缩压在预测血管内血栓切除术后急性缺血性卒中功能结局中的关键作用。
Front Neurol. 2024 May 9;15:1405668. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1405668. eCollection 2024.
6
Predicting Outcome of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Potential Value of Machine Learning Algorithms.预测急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗的结果:机器学习算法的潜在价值
Front Neurol. 2018 Sep 25;9:784. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00784. eCollection 2018.
7
Predicting Clinical Outcomes of Large Vessel Occlusion Before Mechanical Thrombectomy Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习预测机械取栓前大血管闭塞的临床转归。
Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2379-2388. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025411. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
8
Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Prediction of the Risk of Clinically Ineffective Reperfusion in Patients Following Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke.用于预测缺血性中风血栓切除术后患者临床再灌注无效风险的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 May 3;21:621-631. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S520362. eCollection 2025.
9
Safety and efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning combined with endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion of anterior circulation: A multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled clinical trial (SERIC-EVT): Study protocol.远程缺血预处理联合血管内取栓治疗前循环大动脉闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中的安全性和有效性的多中心、随机、平行对照临床试验(SERIC-EVT):研究方案。
Int J Stroke. 2023 Apr;18(4):484-489. doi: 10.1177/17474930221121429. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
10
Machine Learning-Based Identification of Target Groups for Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke.基于机器学习的急性脑卒中取栓目标人群识别
Transl Stroke Res. 2023 Jun;14(3):311-321. doi: 10.1007/s12975-022-01040-5. Epub 2022 Jun 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Limitations in Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Imbalanced Binary Outcome Classification in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.脊柱手术中评估用于不平衡二元结局分类的机器学习模型的局限性:一项系统综述
Brain Sci. 2023 Dec 16;13(12):1723. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13121723.
2
Development and Internal Validation of Machine Learning Models to Predict Mortality and Disability After Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion.机器学习模型在急性前循环大血管闭塞机械取栓后预测死亡率和残疾的开发和内部验证。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Feb;182:e137-e154. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.11.060. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
3
Mechanical thrombectomy in low Alberta stroke program early CT score (ASPECTS) in hyperacute stroke-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
机械取栓在低 Alberta 卒中项目早期 CT 评分(ASPECTS)的超急性期卒中中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Dec;96(1152):20230084. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20230084. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
4
Class imbalance should not throw you off balance: Choosing the right classifiers and performance metrics for brain decoding with imbalanced data.不要被类别不平衡问题困扰:选择合适的分类器和性能指标,对不平衡数据进行脑解码。
Neuroimage. 2023 Aug 15;277:120253. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120253. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
5
An explainable machine learning model for predicting the outcome of ischemic stroke after mechanical thrombectomy.一种可解释的机器学习模型,用于预测机械取栓后缺血性卒中的结局。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Nov;15(11):1136-1141. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019598. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
6
Pre-thrombectomy prognostic prediction of large-vessel ischemic stroke using machine learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用机器学习对大血管缺血性卒中进行血栓切除术术前预后预测:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 8;13:945813. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.945813. eCollection 2022.
7
Machine learning to predict futile recanalization of large vessel occlusion before and after endovascular thrombectomy.机器学习预测血管内血栓切除术前后大血管闭塞的无效再通情况。
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 19;13:909403. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.909403. eCollection 2022.
8
Outcome Prediction Models for Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and External Validation.血管内治疗缺血性脑卒中的结局预测模型:系统评价和外部验证。
Stroke. 2022 Mar;53(3):825-836. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033445. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
9
Mechanical thrombectomy versus medical care alone in large ischemic core: An up-to-date meta-analysis.机械取栓与单纯药物治疗对大梗死核心患者的效果比较:一项最新的荟萃分析。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2022 Feb;28(1):104-114. doi: 10.1177/15910199211016258. Epub 2021 May 14.
10
Predicting mortality in acute ischaemic stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy: analysis of a multicentre prospective registry.预测接受机械取栓治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者的死亡率:一项多中心前瞻性登记研究分析
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 1;11(4):e043415. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043415.