Stein Kevin Y, Froese Logan, Gomez Alwyn, Sainbhi Amanjyot Singh, Vakitbilir Nuray, Islam Abrar, Bergmann Tobias, Zeiler Frederick A
Biomedical Engineering, Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada.
Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P5, Canada.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 May 2;12(5):485. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050485.
It has been proposed that subject-specific intracranial pressure (ICP) thresholds can be feasibly derived using the relationship between cerebrovascular reactivity and ICP. Such individualized intracranial pressure (iICP) thresholds have been suggested to have more robust associations with long-term outcomes of post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) than current guideline-based thresholds. However, both existing works have derived iICP using solely the pressure reactivity index (PRx) and a threshold of +0.20. Therefore, the goal of this study was to validate prior works and compare various cerebrovascular reactivity indices for their utility in deriving iICP. A custom iICP derivation algorithm was developed. Then, using existing archived human datasets from the Winnipeg Acute TBI Database, iICP thresholds were derived using three cerebrovascular reactivity indices: PRx, the pulse amplitude index (PAx), and the RAC (correlation (R) between the pulse amplitude of ICP (A) and cerebral perfusion pressure (C)). The yield of iICP derivation was found to vary significantly, depending on the cerebrovascular reactivity index and threshold used. A logistic regression analysis was then used to evaluate and compare the abilities of each index-derived iICP to predict the 6-month outcome. Among all index-threshold combinations tested, only PRx > 0 was able to produce an iICP that was able to outperform guideline-based ICP thresholds. PRx-based iICP seems to be superior to both PAx- and RAC-based iICP for predicting long-term outcomes. However, further work is needed to identify the ideal cerebrovascular reactivity thresholds for iICP derivation.
有人提出,可以利用脑血管反应性与颅内压之间的关系,切实可行地得出特定个体的颅内压(ICP)阈值。有人认为,与当前基于指南的阈值相比,这种个性化颅内压(iICP)阈值与创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的长期预后有更强有力的关联。然而,现有的研究都是仅使用压力反应性指数(PRx)和+0.20的阈值来得出iICP。因此,本研究的目的是验证先前的研究,并比较各种脑血管反应性指数在推导iICP方面的效用。开发了一种定制的iICP推导算法。然后,利用温尼伯急性TBI数据库中现有的存档人类数据集,使用三种脑血管反应性指数得出iICP阈值:PRx、脉搏振幅指数(PAx)和RAC(颅内压脉搏振幅(A)与脑灌注压(C)之间的相关性(R))。结果发现,iICP推导的成功率因所使用的脑血管反应性指数和阈值而异。然后使用逻辑回归分析来评估和比较每个指数得出的iICP预测6个月预后的能力。在所有测试的指数-阈值组合中,只有PRx>0能够得出优于基于指南的ICP阈值的iICP。基于PRx的iICP在预测长期预后方面似乎优于基于PAx和RAC的iICP。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定推导iICP的理想脑血管反应性阈值。