Kyung Min Gyu, Cho Yun Jae, Lee Jae Hee, Shin Min Seok, Park Jay Hoon, Lee Dong Yeon
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Han-il General Hospital, Seoul 01450, Republic of Korea.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 12;15(10):1214. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15101214.
: The foot posture index (FPI-6) is a practical clinical tool for evaluating standing foot posture using six specific criteria. Although widely used, its reliability and correlation with radiographic parameters remain uncertain. This study aimed to assess the inter-rater reliability of the FPI-6, in both asymptomatic individuals and patients with foot and ankle symptoms, and to examine its correlation with radiographic measurements. : We included 40 asymptomatic male volunteers (group A) and 60 symptomatic patients (group B). Four raters independently assessed the FPI-6 scores, and inter-rater reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Radiographic parameters included the talocalcaneal angle (TCA) on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views, talonavicular coverage angle (TNCA), AP talo-first metatarsal angle (TMA), hindfoot alignment angle (HAA), calcaneal pitch angle (CPA), and Meary's angle (MA). Correlations between the FPI-6 and radiographic measurements were analyzed using Pearson's correlation (). : The FPI-6 showed good to excellent inter-rater reliability in both groups, with higher consistency in group B and among experienced raters. The total FPI-6 score significantly correlated with TNCA ( = 0.665), AP TMA ( = 0.453), lateral TCA ( = 0.369), MA ( = 0.570), and HAA ( = -0.773) (all < 0.001). Group B demonstrated overall stronger correlations between the FPI-6 and radiographic measurements compared to group A (TNCA: 0.664 vs. 0.258; AP TMA: 0.542 vs. 0.139; lateral TCA: 0.492 vs. -0.101; MA: 0.544 vs. 0.172; and HAA: -0.712 vs. -0.374). : With careful application, the FPI-6 is a reliable and valid tool for clinical assessment of foot posture, especially in settings without immediate access to radiographs.
足姿势指数(FPI-6)是一种使用六个特定标准评估站立时足部姿势的实用临床工具。尽管被广泛使用,但其可靠性以及与影像学参数的相关性仍不明确。本研究旨在评估FPI-6在无症状个体和有足踝症状患者中的评分者间信度,并检验其与影像学测量结果的相关性。我们纳入了40名无症状男性志愿者(A组)和60名有症状的患者(B组)。四名评分者独立评估FPI-6评分,并使用组内相关系数评估评分者间信度。影像学参数包括前后位(AP)和侧位片上的距跟角(TCA)、距舟覆盖角(TNCA)、AP位距骨-第一跖骨角(TMA)、后足对线角(HAA)、跟骨倾斜角(CPA)和梅里角(MA)。使用Pearson相关性分析FPI-6与影像学测量结果之间的相关性。FPI-6在两组中均显示出良好至优秀的评分者间信度,在B组和经验丰富的评分者中一致性更高。FPI-6总分与TNCA(=0.665)、AP位TMA(=0.453)、侧位TCA(=0.369)、MA(=0.570)和HAA(=-0.773)显著相关(均P<0.001)。与A组相比,B组中FPI-6与影像学测量结果之间的总体相关性更强(TNCA:0.664对0.258;AP位TMA:0.542对0.139;侧位TCA:0.492对-0.101;MA:0.544对0.172;HAA:-0.712对-0.374)。谨慎应用时,FPI-6是用于足部姿势临床评估的可靠且有效的工具,尤其是在无法立即获取X线片的情况下。