Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen of Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Glückstraße 11, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Department of Prosthodontics, University Hospital Erlangen of Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1448. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05229-y.
In order to successfully perform orthodontic mini-implant procedures successfully for the subsequent anchoring of orthodontic appliances, it is crucial to know the palatal bone thickness. This is usually assessed using two-dimensional radiographs. The purpose of this study was to use a three-dimensional digital imaging measurement method to provide information on palatal bone volume and bone thickness and to make recommendations on the optimal and safe insertion site and angle for palatal mini-implants.
For this observational, cross-section study, pre-existing cone beam computed tomography scans of 184 patients were converted into 3D Standard Tessellation Language (STL) models of the maxilla. The area between the canine and the first molar was divided into 6 regions of interest (ROIs), three on the left side of the palate and three on the right side. The bone thickness of the palate was analyzed volumetrically and linearly while simulating different mini-implant insertion angles of 0°, 10°, 20° and 30° degrees relative to the palatal surface.
Among the ROIs, the greatest mean bone thickness was observed in the region of the first premolars with a mean distance (MD) of 10.44 ± 2.53 mm and decreased from anterior to posterior (MD: 3.44 ± 1.16 mm). The highest volume (Vol) values were also measured in the anterior palatal region (Vol: 1127.26 ± 483.91 mm), while there was also a decrease in the posterior region (Vol: 394.36 ± 180.22 mm). Regarding the simulated palatal mini-implant insertion sites, the greatest bone thickness was found in the anterior region, at the level of the canines with an angle of 0° (MD: 12.25 ± 3.75 mm). In the more posterior region, at the level between the first and second premolars, the greatest bone thickness was observed at an angle of 30° (MD: 7.93 ± 3.81 mm). Gender differences were found.
This clinical study showed that the paramedian region at the level of the first premolar is the safest site for orthodontic mini-implant placement as evaluated by three-dimensional measurements. The results showed that implant insertion angle, gender and age are important aspects to consider when planning and inserting orthodontic palatal mini-implants.
N.a.
为了成功进行正畸微型种植体手术,以便随后固定正畸矫治器,了解腭骨厚度至关重要。通常使用二维射线照相术进行评估。本研究的目的是使用三维数字成像测量方法提供有关腭骨体积和骨厚度的信息,并就腭部微型种植体的最佳和安全插入部位和角度提出建议。
在这项观察性的横断面研究中,将 184 名患者的预先存在的锥形束计算机断层扫描转换为上颌的 3D 标准网格语言(STL)模型。将犬齿和第一磨牙之间的区域分为 6 个感兴趣区域(ROI),每侧 3 个。在模拟相对于腭表面的 0°,10°,20°和 30°的不同微型植入物插入角度时,通过体积和线性分析了腭骨的骨厚度。
在 ROI 中,观察到第一前磨牙区域的平均骨厚度最大,平均距离(MD)为 10.44±2.53mm,并从前向后减小(MD:3.44±1.16mm)。在腭前部区域也测量到最高的体积(Vol)值(Vol:1127.26±483.91mm),而在后部区域也有所下降(Vol:394.36±180.22mm)。关于模拟的腭部微型植入物插入部位,在前部区域,在犬齿水平,角度为 0°时,发现最大的骨厚度(MD:12.25±3.75mm)。在更靠后的区域,在第一和第二前磨牙之间的水平,在 30°角时观察到最大的骨厚度(MD:7.93±3.81mm)。发现了性别差异。
这项临床研究表明,通过三维测量,在第一前磨牙水平的正中区域是放置正畸微型植入物的最安全部位。结果表明,植入物插入角度,性别和年龄是计划和插入正畸腭部微型植入物时需要考虑的重要方面。
无。