Suppr超能文献

平衡还是力量?重新审视成人矢状面畸形患者矢状面排列不齐中的肌肉指标。

Balance or Strength? Reconsidering Muscle Metrics in Sagittal Malalignment in Adult Sagittal Deformity Patients.

作者信息

Huang Donghua, Wang Zhan, Dekhne Mihir, Durbas Atahan, Subramanian Tejas, Dykhouse Gabrielle, Uzzo Robert N, Colón Luis Felipe, Owusu-Sarpong Stephane, Kim Han Jo, Lovecchio Francis

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 May 9;14(10):3293. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103293.

Abstract

: Atrophy of the paraspinal and psoas major muscles is closely linked to sagittal malalignment in adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, most studies overlook the balance between these muscle groups. This study investigates the relationship between trunk muscle balance and sagittal alignment in ASD patients. : A single-institution database was reviewed for patients with sagittal malalignment (PT > 20° and PI-LL > 10°). Standard sagittal parameters were measured based on standing X-rays. The cross-section area (CSA) of trunk posterior muscles (CSA: erector spinae and multifidus) and anterior muscles (CSA: psoas) at L4 were measured based on a T2-weighted MRI. Patients with prior lateral fusions were excluded. Muscle balance was evaluated by the CSA ratio of trunk posterior to anterior muscles (CSA). The relationship between sagittal alignment parameters and CSA, CSA, as well as CSA were analyzed using linear and quadratic regressions. Akaike information criteria (AIC) compared model fit. Subgroup analyses examined the relationship between sagittal alignment changes and different CSA levels. : A total of 112 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria. CSA correlated linearly with SS (r = 0.057, = 0.011), PT (r = 0.043, = 0.028), and T4-L1PA mismatch (r = 0.044, = 0.027). CSA showed no significant linear or quadratic relationships with sagittal spinal alignment parameters. In contrast, CSA was quadratically associated with LL (r = 0.056, = 0.044), SS (r = 0.134, < 0.001), PI (r = 0.096, = 0.004), L1PA (r = 0.114, = 0.001), and T4-L1PA mismatch (r = 0.094, = 0.005). Quadratic models of CSA consistently had higher r and lower AIC values compared to the linear models of CSA for most sagittal alignment parameters, especially in SS, PI, L1PA, and T4-L1PA mismatch (AIC difference ≥4). Higher CSA is correlated to larger PI (and consequently, larger LL, SS, and L1PA). : Trunk posterior-anterior muscle balance (CSA) demonstrates a stronger relationship with sagittal alignment than individual muscle metrics. Quantitative MRI-based definitions of sarcopenia may need to be adjusted for PI.

摘要

脊柱旁肌和腰大肌萎缩与成人脊柱畸形(ASD)矢状面排列不齐密切相关。然而,大多数研究忽略了这些肌肉群之间的平衡。本研究调查了ASD患者躯干肌肉平衡与矢状面排列之间的关系。

对一家机构的数据库进行回顾,纳入矢状面排列不齐(PT>20°且PI-LL>10°)的患者。基于站立位X线片测量标准矢状面参数。基于T2加权MRI测量L4水平躯干后部肌肉(CSA:竖脊肌和多裂肌)和前部肌肉(CSA:腰大肌)的横截面积。排除既往有侧方融合术的患者。通过躯干后部与前部肌肉的CSA比值(CSA)评估肌肉平衡。使用线性和二次回归分析矢状面排列参数与CSA、CSA以及CSA之间的关系。采用赤池信息准则(AIC)比较模型拟合度。亚组分析研究矢状面排列变化与不同CSA水平之间的关系。

共有112例患者符合纳入和排除标准。CSA与SS呈线性相关(r = 0.057,P = 0.011)、与PT呈线性相关(r = 0.043,P = 0.028)、与T4-L1PA失配呈线性相关(r = 0.044,P = 0.027)。CSA与矢状面脊柱排列参数无显著线性或二次关系。相比之下,CSA与LL呈二次相关(r = 0.056,P = 0.044)、与SS呈二次相关(r = 0.134,P<0.001)、与PI呈二次相关(r = 0.096,P = 0.004)、与L1PA呈二次相关(r = 0.114,P = 0.001)、与T4-L1PA失配呈二次相关(r = 0.094,P = 0.005)。对于大多数矢状面排列参数,CSA的二次模型与CSA的线性模型相比,始终具有更高的r值和更低的AIC值,尤其是在SS、PI、L1PA和T4-L1PA失配方面(AIC差异≥4)。较高的CSA与较大的PI相关(因此,也与较大的LL、SS和L1PA相关)。

躯干后部-前部肌肉平衡(CSA)与矢状面排列的关系比单个肌肉指标更强。基于定量MRI的肌肉减少症定义可能需要根据PI进行调整。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a97/12112739/e5209661b01f/jcm-14-03293-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验