• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量初次全髋关节置换术后的短期结果:基于价值医疗的方法。

Measuring Short-Term Outcomes Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Value-Based Healthcare Approach.

作者信息

Christofilopoulos Panayiotis, Bothorel Hugo, Bilger Selina, Rüter Florian, Cody Robyn, Stoffel Karl

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, La Tour Hospital, 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland.

Research Department, La Tour Hospital, 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 May 9;14(10):3310. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103310.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14103310
PMID:40429303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12112243/
Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a highly effective treatment for end-stage hip disease, but the increasing volume of procedures demands a focus on value-based healthcare (VBHC) to ensure optimal outcomes. This study proposes a novel approach to evaluate the value delivered by THA using direct costs and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). : This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing primary THA for unilateral osteoarthritis at two hospitals between 2018 and 2021. PROMs specific to hip osteoarthritis were assessed preoperatively and in the second postoperative year. The delivered was calculated using PROM results in comparison with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds. The associated was defined as direct THA expenses in comparison with the median direct costs of the cohort series, and the was calculated as the ratio of over . A multivariable linear regression was performed to identify the factors associated with the THA . : Among 224 patients (70 ± 10 years, 46% males), THA was of satisfactory (≥1.0) for 82%. The THA was lower for patients of female sex (β -0.27, = 0.047), with higher preoperative PROMs (β -0.36, < 0.001), previous contralateral THA (β -0.36, = 0.049), or ipsilateral hip surgery (β -1.41, < 0.001) with custom (β -0.76, = 0.011) or fully cemented (β -0.83, = 0.021) implants. : The proposed methodology effectively assessed the THA value, revealing satisfactory outcomes for most patients but also identifying areas for improvement. These findings emphasize the need for risk-adjusted VBHC models to enhance equity and efficiency in arthroplasty care.

摘要

全髋关节置换术(THA)是治疗终末期髋关节疾病的一种高效方法,但手术量的不断增加要求关注基于价值的医疗保健(VBHC)以确保最佳疗效。本研究提出了一种新方法,使用直接成本和患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)来评估THA所带来的价值。:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2018年至2021年间在两家医院接受单侧骨关节炎初次THA的患者。在术前和术后第二年评估了针对髋骨关节炎的PROMs。通过将PROM结果与最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值进行比较来计算所带来的价值。相关成本定义为THA直接费用与队列系列中位数直接成本的比较,而价值效益比计算为价值与成本的比率。进行多变量线性回归以确定与THA价值效益比相关的因素。:在224例患者(70±10岁,46%为男性)中,82%的患者THA的价值效益比令人满意(≥1.0)。女性患者的THA价值效益比更低(β -0.27,P = 0.047),术前PROMs更高(β -0.36,P <0.001),既往对侧THA(β -0.36,P = 0.049),或同侧髋关节手术(β -1.41,P <0.001),使用定制(β -0.76,P = 0.011)或全骨水泥(β -0.83,P = 0.021)植入物。:所提出的方法有效地评估了THA的价值,揭示了大多数患者的满意疗效,但也确定了需要改进的领域。这些发现强调了需要风险调整的VBHC模型来提高关节置换护理的公平性和效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c0/12112243/d4e572024159/jcm-14-03310-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c0/12112243/2d1caa5acd32/jcm-14-03310-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c0/12112243/d4e572024159/jcm-14-03310-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c0/12112243/2d1caa5acd32/jcm-14-03310-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c0/12112243/d4e572024159/jcm-14-03310-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring Short-Term Outcomes Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Value-Based Healthcare Approach.测量初次全髋关节置换术后的短期结果:基于价值医疗的方法。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 9;14(10):3310. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103310.
2
Contralateral THAs More Than 1 Year Apart: Do PROMs and Healthcare Utilization Differ After Each Procedure?间隔超过1年的对侧全髋关节置换术:每次手术后患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)和医疗资源利用情况是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 May 1;483(5):832-842. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003339. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
3
Readmission Within 90 Days After Primary THA Is Associated With Decreased Improvement in 1-Year Patient-reported Outcome Measures and Increased Reoperation Rates.初次全髋关节置换术后90天内再次入院与患者报告的1年结局指标改善降低及再次手术率增加相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003429.
4
A Matched Comparison of the Rates of Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference Following Conversion and Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.接受转换和初次全髋关节置换术后达到最小临床重要差异的比例的匹配比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Sep;38(9):1767-1772. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.029. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
5
Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review.THA 中的最小临床重要差异存在显著差异:系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Apr 1;481(4):702-714. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002434. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
6
Should We Aim to Help Patients "Feel Better" or "Feel Good" After Total Hip Arthroplasty? Determining Factors Affecting the Achievement of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State.全髋关节置换术后我们应旨在帮助患者“感觉更好”还是“感觉良好”?影响达到最小临床重要差异和患者可接受症状状态的决定因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Feb;38(2):293-299. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.014. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
7
What Is the Clinical Benefit of Common Orthopaedic Procedures as Assessed by the PROMIS Versus Other Validated Outcomes Tools?常见骨科手术的临床获益有哪些?与其他经过验证的结局评估工具相比,PROMIS 评估如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Sep 1;480(9):1672-1681. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002241. Epub 2022 May 10.
8
Surgical Hip Dislocation in the Era of Hip Arthroscopy Demonstrates High Survivorship and Improvements in Patient-reported Outcomes for Complex Femoroacetabular Impingement.关节镜时代的髋关节脱位手术具有高存活率,并改善了复杂型股骨髋臼撞击症患者的报告结局。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1671-1682. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003032. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
9
What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.哪些术前因素与 THA 后未达到最小临床重要差异有关?一项国际多中心研究的结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1301-1312. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000667.
10
Do the Revision Rates of Arthroplasty Surgeons Correlate With Postoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.关节置换外科医生的修正率与术后患者报告的结果测量评分相关吗?来自澳大利亚骨科协会全国关节置换登记处的一项研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):98-112. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002737. Epub 2023 Jun 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Contralateral THAs More Than 1 Year Apart: Do PROMs and Healthcare Utilization Differ After Each Procedure?间隔超过1年的对侧全髋关节置换术:每次手术后患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)和医疗资源利用情况是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 May 1;483(5):832-842. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003339. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
2
Variation in Demographics, Hospital, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty According to Biological Sex.根据生物学性别,全髋关节置换术后的人口统计学、医院和患者报告的结局存在差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Jan;40(1):127-135.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.063. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
3
Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation into French of the Harris Hip Score and the Modified Harris Hip Score.
《Harris髋关节评分和改良Harris髋关节评分的法语翻译及跨文化调适》
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2024 Mar 5;15:81-91. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S439707. eCollection 2024.
4
Men and women undergoing total hip arthroplasty have different clinical presentations before surgery and different outcomes at 1-year follow-up.接受全髋关节置换术的男性和女性在术前的临床表现不同,术后 1 年的随访结果也不同。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Oct;32(10):2635-2643. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12124. Epub 2024 Mar 9.
5
The Appropriateness of Preoperative Patient Reported Outcome Measures as an Indication for Total Hip Arthroplasty.术前患者报告结局测量作为全髋关节置换术适应证的适宜性。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7 Suppl 2):S252-S257. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
6
Epidemiology of total hip arthroplasty: demographics, comorbidities and outcomes.全髋关节置换术的流行病学:人口统计学、合并症及结果
Arthroplasty. 2023 Jan 3;5(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00156-1.
7
Comparison of modern periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia with total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis-10-year outcomes are comparable in young adult patients.髋关节发育不良的现代髋臼周围截骨术与髋关节骨关节炎的全髋关节置换术的比较——年轻成年患者10年的结果具有可比性。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2022 Jul 5;9(3):178-184. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnac029. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
Should We Aim to Help Patients "Feel Better" or "Feel Good" After Total Hip Arthroplasty? Determining Factors Affecting the Achievement of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State.全髋关节置换术后我们应旨在帮助患者“感觉更好”还是“感觉良好”?影响达到最小临床重要差异和患者可接受症状状态的决定因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Feb;38(2):293-299. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.014. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
9
Does Value-Based Care Threaten Joint Arthroplasty Access for Vulnerable Patient Populations?: AOA Critical Issues.基于价值的医疗保健是否会威胁到弱势群体接受关节置换手术的机会?美国骨科医师学会重点关注问题。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Nov 2;104(21):e92. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01332. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
10
Outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty using 3D image-based custom stems in unselected patients: a systematic review.在未经过挑选的患者中使用基于3D图像定制柄进行初次全髋关节置换术的结果:一项系统评价
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Dec 10;6(12):1166-1180. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210053.