• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于CT的亨氏单位评估——一种用于骨盆脆性骨折患者未诊断骨质疏松症的新型筛查工具

CT-Based Evaluation of Hounsfield Units-A Novel Screening Tool for Undiagnosed Osteoporosis in Patients with Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis.

作者信息

Gleich Johannes, Steiner Elisabeth, Ehrnthaller Christian, Degen Nikolaus, Lampert Christopher, Böcker Wolfgang, Neuerburg Carl, Linhart Christoph

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 May 12;14(10):3346. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103346.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14103346
PMID:40429341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12111929/
Abstract

: This institutional, register-based analysis aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using CT-based sacral Hounsfield units (HUs) for assessing bone density in pelvic fragility fractures and to explore their potential correlation with DEXA measurements and osteological laboratory diagnostics. : Patients aged > 80 years, admitted between 2003 and 2019 with pelvic ring fractures, were analyzed in this retrospective single-center study. CT scans were evaluated according to the classification of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs), which guided treatment decisions (conservative or surgical). The diagnosis of a fragility fracture was based on both fracture morphology and patient history, including the presence of low-energy trauma. Bone health was assessed using standardized laboratory diagnostics including serum calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, and 25(OH)-vitamin D, in addition to DEXA scans and CT-derived Hounsfield units. Vitamin D levels and bone density evaluations were analyzed to identify possible correlations among these factors and with fracture patterns. : A total of 456 patients (mean age 87.3 years, 79.6% female) were included. The CT-based FFP classification identified Type II as the most common fracture type (66.7%). Conservative treatment was the predominant approach (84.9%). Serum 25(OH)-vitamin D deficiency was observed in 62.7% of the patients, while osteopenia and osteoporosis were found in 34.3% and 46.5% of cases, respectively. HU values at S1 showed significant correlation with femoral neck T-scores, highlighting the utility of CT scans for bone density assessment. : This study emphasizes the complementary roles of CT-derived HU values and DEXA T-scores in evaluating bone quality and fracture severity in geriatric patients with FFP. While DEXA remains the gold standard, CT imaging offers valuable early insights, supporting the timely initiation of osteoporosis therapy. Given the high prevalence of fragility fractures in this age group, early CT-based screening may facilitate earlier initiation of osteoporosis-specific therapy, including anabolic agents where indicated. Further research is needed to explore the relationships between vitamin D levels, bone density assessments, and fracture types.

摘要

这项基于机构登记的分析旨在评估使用基于CT的骶骨亨氏单位(HU)评估骨盆脆性骨折骨密度的可行性,并探讨其与双能X线吸收法(DEXA)测量值及骨学实验室诊断之间的潜在相关性。在这项回顾性单中心研究中,分析了2003年至2019年间收治的年龄大于80岁且伴有骨盆环骨折的患者。根据骨盆脆性骨折(FFP)分类对CT扫描结果进行评估,该分类指导治疗决策(保守治疗或手术治疗)。脆性骨折的诊断基于骨折形态和患者病史,包括低能量创伤的存在情况。除了DEXA扫描和CT衍生的亨氏单位外,还使用包括血清钙、磷酸盐、碱性磷酸酶和25(OH)-维生素D在内的标准化实验室诊断方法评估骨骼健康状况。分析维生素D水平和骨密度评估结果,以确定这些因素之间以及与骨折类型之间的可能相关性。共纳入456例患者(平均年龄87.3岁,79.6%为女性)。基于CT的FFP分类显示II型为最常见的骨折类型(66.7%)。保守治疗是主要的治疗方法(84.9%)。62.7%的患者存在血清25(OH)-维生素D缺乏,而骨量减少和骨质疏松分别在34.3%和46.5%的病例中被发现。S1处的HU值与股骨颈T值显著相关,突出了CT扫描在骨密度评估中的实用性。这项研究强调了CT衍生的HU值和DEXA T值在评估老年FFP患者骨质量和骨折严重程度方面的互补作用。虽然DEXA仍然是金标准,但CT成像提供了有价值的早期见解,支持及时启动骨质疏松症治疗。鉴于该年龄组脆性骨折的高患病率,基于CT的早期筛查可能有助于更早地启动骨质疏松症特异性治疗,包括在有指征时使用合成代谢药物。需要进一步研究来探索维生素D水平、骨密度评估和骨折类型之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a784/12111929/badcaff7a773/jcm-14-03346-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a784/12111929/9eee7ed3d993/jcm-14-03346-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a784/12111929/ef3833b5666e/jcm-14-03346-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a784/12111929/e12d19e8d7e4/jcm-14-03346-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a784/12111929/e004e81cab88/jcm-14-03346-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a784/12111929/b53c86a9e54c/jcm-14-03346-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a784/12111929/badcaff7a773/jcm-14-03346-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a784/12111929/9eee7ed3d993/jcm-14-03346-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a784/12111929/ef3833b5666e/jcm-14-03346-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a784/12111929/e12d19e8d7e4/jcm-14-03346-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a784/12111929/e004e81cab88/jcm-14-03346-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a784/12111929/b53c86a9e54c/jcm-14-03346-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a784/12111929/badcaff7a773/jcm-14-03346-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
CT-Based Evaluation of Hounsfield Units-A Novel Screening Tool for Undiagnosed Osteoporosis in Patients with Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis.基于CT的亨氏单位评估——一种用于骨盆脆性骨折患者未诊断骨质疏松症的新型筛查工具
J Clin Med. 2025 May 12;14(10):3346. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103346.
2
Proximal Femur Hounsfield Units on CT Colonoscopy Correlate With Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry.CT 结肠镜检查股骨近端 Hounsfield 单位与双能 X 射线吸收测定法相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Apr;477(4):850-860. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000480.
3
High prevalence of missed information related on bone health in orthogeriatric patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis-an institutional register-based analysis.高患病率的相关信息缺失与骨健康在老年骨科患者的脆性骨盆骨折-基于机构的注册分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Apr;33(4):901-907. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-06246-1. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
4
CT-based evaluation of volumetric bone density in fragility fractures of the pelvis-a matched case-control analysis.基于 CT 的骨盆脆性骨折容积骨密度评估:一项配对病例对照分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Feb;29(2):459-465. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4307-6. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
5
What is the role of CT-based Hounsfield unit assessment in the evaluation of bone mineral density in patients undergoing 1- or 2-level lumbar spinal fusion for degenerative spinal pathologies? A prospective study.CT 基于亨氏单位评估在评估因退行性脊柱病变行 1 或 2 节段腰椎融合术患者的骨密度中的作用?一项前瞻性研究。
Spine J. 2023 Oct;23(10):1427-1434. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.05.015. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
6
Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan Versus Computed Tomography for Bone Density Assessment.双能X线吸收法(DEXA)扫描与计算机断层扫描用于骨密度评估的比较
Cureus. 2021 Feb 10;13(2):e13261. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13261.
7
Which screw corridors can be used for bilateral fragility fractures of the pelvis with a transverse fracture component (FFP IVb)?哪些螺钉通道可用于伴有横断骨折成分的骨盆双侧脆性骨折(FFP IVb)?
Injury. 2025 Feb;56(2):112171. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112171. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
8
Determination of bone density in patients with sacral fractures via CT scan.通过CT扫描测定骶骨骨折患者的骨密度。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Nov;104(7):1037-1041. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.07.022. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
9
Use of routine thoracic and abdominal computed tomography scans for assessing bone mineral density and detecting osteoporosis.使用常规胸部和腹部计算机断层扫描来评估骨矿物质密度并检测骨质疏松症。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(10):1871-81. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1074892. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
10
Opportunistic Osteoporosis Assessment and Fracture Risk Determination Using Cancellous Density Measurement in Hounsfield Units of Native Lumbar Computed Tomography Images-A Comparative Study with Conventional Bone Density Evaluation.利用原生腰椎计算机断层扫描图像的亨氏单位松质骨密度测量进行机会性骨质疏松评估和骨折风险测定——与传统骨密度评估的比较研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 13;14(4):1226. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041226.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of Phantomless Calibration of Routine Computed Tomography Scans for Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening in the Spine Clinic.脊柱诊所机会性骨质疏松症筛查中常规计算机断层扫描无体模校准的准确性
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Apr 15;50(8):E142-E150. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005080. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
2
Hounsfield Unit Values as an Adjunct Diagnostic Tool: Investigating Its Relationship with Bone Mineral Density and Vertebral Bone Quality in Lumbar Degenerative Disease Patients.体素单位值作为辅助诊断工具的研究:探讨其与腰椎退行性疾病患者骨密度和椎体骨质量的关系。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;183:e722-e729. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.013. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
3
Correlation of Hounsfield Units with Bone Mineral Density and T-Score in Chinese Adults.
中国成年人中亨氏单位与骨密度及T值的相关性
World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;183:e261-e267. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.073. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
4
Discrepancy between DXA and CT-based assessment of spine bone mineral density.基于双能X线吸收法(DXA)与计算机断层扫描(CT)的脊柱骨密度评估之间的差异。
Spine Deform. 2023 May;11(3):677-683. doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00646-5. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
5
The grade of instability in fragility fractures of the pelvis correlates with impaired early mobilization.骨盆脆性骨折的不稳定性程度与早期活动受限相关。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):4053-4060. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01933-y. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
6
High prevalence of missed information related on bone health in orthogeriatric patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis-an institutional register-based analysis.高患病率的相关信息缺失与骨健康在老年骨科患者的脆性骨盆骨折-基于机构的注册分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Apr;33(4):901-907. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-06246-1. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
7
Modified therapy concepts for fragility fractures of the pelvis after additional MRI.骨盆骨折后附加 MRI 的脆性骨折的改良治疗方案。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 8;15(10):e0238773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238773. eCollection 2020.
8
Regional improvements in lumbosacropelvic Hounsfield units following teriparatide treatment.骨盆腔 Hounsfield 单位区域改善在特立帕肽治疗后。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Aug;49(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2020.5.FOCUS20273.
9
The relationship between serum vitamin D and fracture risk in the elderly: a meta-analysis.血清维生素 D 与老年人骨折风险的关系:一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Feb 27;15(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01603-y.
10
Use of Hounsfield units of S1 body to diagnose osteoporosis in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases.利用 S1 体的 Hounsfield 单位诊断腰椎退行性疾病患者的骨质疏松症。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E6. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18614.