Taurbekova Binura, Sarsenov Radmir, Yaqoob Muhammad M, Atageldiyeva Kuralay, Semenova Yuliya, Fazli Siamac, Starodubov Andrey, Angalieva Akmaral, Sarria-Santamera Antonio
Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, 5/1 Kerey and Zhanibek Khandar Str., Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Department of Biology, School of Sciences and Humanities, Nazarbayev University, 53 Kabanbay Batyr Ave., Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
J Clin Med. 2025 May 21;14(10):3588. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103588.
Diabetes mellitus is a heterogeneous metabolic disorder that poses substantial challenges in the management of patients with diabetes. Emerging research underscores the potential of unsupervised cluster analysis as a promising methodological approach for unraveling the complex heterogeneity of diabetes mellitus. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of unsupervised cluster analysis in identifying diabetes phenotypes, elucidating the risks of diabetes-related complications, and distinguishing treatment responses. We searched MEDLINE Complete, PubMed, and Web of Science and reviewed forty-one relevant studies. Additionally, we conducted a cross-sectional study using K-means cluster analysis of real-world clinical data from 558 patients with diabetes. A key finding was the consistent reproducibility of the five clusters across diverse populations, encompassing various patient origins and ethnic backgrounds. MOD and MARD were the most prevalent clusters, while SAID was the least prevalent. Subgroup analysis stratified by ethnic group indicated a higher prevalence of SIDD among individuals of Asian descent than among other ethnic groups. These clusters shared similar phenotypic traits and risk profiles for complications, with some variations in their distribution and key clinical variables. Notably, the SIRD subtype was associated with a wide spectrum of kidney-related clinical presentations. Alternative clustering techniques may reveal additional clinically relevant diabetes subtypes. Our cross-sectional study identified five subgroups, each with distinct profiles of glycemic control, lipid metabolism, blood pressure, and renal function. Overall, the results suggest that unsupervised cluster analysis holds promise for revealing clinically meaningful subgroups with distinct characteristics, complication risks, and treatment responses that may remain undetected using conventional approaches.
糖尿病是一种异质性代谢紊乱疾病,给糖尿病患者的管理带来了巨大挑战。新兴研究强调了无监督聚类分析作为一种有前景的方法,用于揭示糖尿病复杂异质性的潜力。本系统评价评估了无监督聚类分析在识别糖尿病表型、阐明糖尿病相关并发症风险以及区分治疗反应方面的有效性。我们检索了MEDLINE Complete、PubMed和Web of Science,并审查了41项相关研究。此外,我们使用K均值聚类分析对558例糖尿病患者的真实世界临床数据进行了横断面研究。一个关键发现是,这五个聚类在不同人群中具有一致的可重复性,涵盖了不同的患者来源和种族背景。MOD和MARD是最常见的聚类,而SAID是最不常见的。按种族分层的亚组分析表明,亚洲血统个体中SIDD的患病率高于其他种族群体。这些聚类具有相似的表型特征和并发症风险概况,但其分布和关键临床变量存在一些差异。值得注意的是,SIRD亚型与广泛的肾脏相关临床表现有关。其他聚类技术可能会揭示更多临床上相关的糖尿病亚型。我们的横断面研究确定了五个亚组,每个亚组在血糖控制、脂质代谢、血压和肾功能方面具有不同的特征。总体而言,结果表明,无监督聚类分析有望揭示具有不同特征、并发症风险和治疗反应的临床上有意义的亚组,而这些亚组使用传统方法可能无法检测到。