Martín-Gómez José Javier, Rodríguez-Lorenzo José Luis, Espinosa-Roldán Francisco Emanuel, de Santamaría Félix Cabello Sáenz, Muñoz-Organero Gregorio, Tocino Ángel, Cervantes Emilio
Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Salamanca (IRNASA)-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Cordel de Merinas, 40, 37008 Salamanca, Spain.
Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics v.v.i, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Královopolská 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic.
Plants (Basel). 2025 May 19;14(10):1522. doi: 10.3390/plants14101522.
Seed morphological description requires quantitative methods for further comparison. Here, traditional measurements, curvature analysis, and the -index (percentage of similarity to a geometric model) were applied to the average contours (Acs) of 271 cultivars from the Spanish collection at IMIDRA (Madrid, Spain), including 9 different species and several sylvestris seeds (i.e., those derived from plants that once grew in the wild). Acs are graphical representations of the shape in seed populations, which can be obtained either from image analysis programs or computationally opening the way to quantitative analysis. A geometric model is a geometrically defined, closed curve, used as a reference for shape quantification. Based on existing differences between the Hebén cultivar (collected in 2020 and 2024; Hebén model, for morphotype 1) and the European varieties Chenin and Gewurztraminer (Chenin model, for morphotype 2), we created two models. The comparisons were based on a -index, resulting in four groups: Group 1 contained all seeds with values lower than 90 for both models and included all species other than and most sylvestris seeds; Groups 2 and 3 contained seeds with -index values higher than 94 for the Hebén and Chenin models, respectively. Group 4 consisted of seeds not included in the other groups. Based on -index values, differences in curvature and solidity, and PCA analysis with Fourier coefficients, this work defines two new morphotypes associated with the Hebén (Group 2) and Chenin (Group 3) models, related to Iberian and Western European varieties, respectively.
种子形态描述需要定量方法以便进一步比较。在此,传统测量、曲率分析和 -指数(与几何模型的相似百分比)被应用于来自西班牙马德里农业和食品研究与技术中心(IMIDRA)西班牙种子库的271个品种的平均轮廓(Acs),其中包括9个不同物种以及一些野生种子(即那些源自曾经生长在野外的植物的种子)。Acs是种子群体形状的图形表示,可以通过图像分析程序或通过计算获得,为定量分析开辟了道路。几何模型是一个几何定义的封闭曲线,用作形状量化的参考。基于2020年和2024年收集的Hebén品种(Hebén模型,用于形态类型1)与欧洲品种白诗南和琼瑶浆(白诗南模型,用于形态类型2)之间的现有差异,我们创建了两个模型。比较基于 -指数,结果分为四组:第1组包含两个模型值均低于90的所有种子,包括除 和大多数野生种子之外的所有物种;第2组和第3组分别包含Hebén模型和白诗南模型 -指数值高于94的种子。第4组由不包含在其他组中的种子组成。基于 -指数值、曲率和坚实度差异以及使用傅里叶系数的主成分分析,这项工作定义了与Hebén(第2组)和白诗南(第3组)模型相关的两种新形态类型,分别与伊比利亚和西欧品种相关。