Borges Marcos C, Kennedy McKenzie M, Kropf Charles W, Caldwell Matthew D, Huang Robert D, Kim Grace J, Hughes David T, Gruppen Larry D, Rooney Deborah M
Department of Internal Medicine, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 May 25;12:23821205251336279. doi: 10.1177/23821205251336279. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
Several challenges regarding Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) processes have been previously reported. Few studies have addressed the cost of assessment in healthcare professional education. This study aimed to assess the time spent on and the cost of CCC processes, and faculty perception of the Milestones assessment in three residency programs.
We surveyed CCC faculty members to capture time devoted to, and satisfaction with, CCC processes from three residency programs at the University of Michigan: Anesthesiology, Emergency Medicine, and Surgery. During preparatory periods before CCC meetings, administrative staff used daily logs to record time spent in the CCC preparatory period to develop meeting documents and resident reports. CCC faculty members supplied estimated time spent preparing residents' assessments through a survey administered the day following the meeting. Additionally, the duration of each CCC meeting was recorded, and salaries were confirmed to estimate total cost. Total faculty and staff time was summed and reviewed by each departmental CCC program director.
CCC members found the unstandardized semi-annual report compiled by the programs was poorly organized, not easy to review, and did not provide high-quality information for setting Milestones. The majority of CCC members reported the current CCC process does not allow enough time for review of resident data, does not provide valuable feedback to inform resident progression, and does not provide adequate rigor to defend CCC decisions. Annually, administrative staff spent 162.9 ± 151.7 h preparing the reports. Faculty spent 147.0 ± 78.4 h for the resident assessment preparation and 97.3 ± 24.1 h in CCCs meeting. Based on salaries, the cost of CCC processes for Milestone assessment totaled USD83,437, with USD22,776, USD31,764, and USD28,897 for Anesthesiology, Emergency Medicine, and Surgery, respectively. With an average of USD395.44 per resident, the total annual CCC cost for University of Michigan Medical was extrapolated to be USD404,531.
Though Milestones were implemented more than ten years ago, CCC processes are still unsatisfactory to faculty and pose a significant institutional cost. Alternative approaches are still needed to improve resident competency assessment processes.
先前已有报道指出临床能力委员会(CCC)流程存在若干挑战。很少有研究涉及医疗专业教育中的评估成本。本研究旨在评估CCC流程所花费的时间和成本,以及三个住院医师培训项目中教员对里程碑评估的看法。
我们对CCC教员进行了调查,以了解密歇根大学三个住院医师培训项目(麻醉学、急诊医学和外科学)在CCC流程上所花费的时间以及他们的满意度。在CCC会议前的准备阶段,行政人员使用每日日志记录在CCC准备阶段用于编写会议文件和住院医师报告所花费的时间。CCC教员通过会议次日进行的一项调查提供了准备住院医师评估所花费的估计时间。此外,记录了每次CCC会议的时长,并确认了薪资以估算总成本。各部门的CCC项目主任汇总并审核了教员和工作人员的总时间。
CCC成员发现各项目编制的非标准化半年期报告组织性差、不易审查,且未为设定里程碑提供高质量信息。大多数CCC成员报告称,当前的CCC流程没有留出足够时间审查住院医师数据,没有提供有价值的反馈以指导住院医师的进步,也没有提供足够的严谨性来支持CCC的决策。每年,行政人员花费162.9±151.7小时编写报告。教员花费147.0±78.4小时准备住院医师评估,在CCC会议上花费97.3±24.1小时。根据薪资计算,里程碑评估的CCC流程成本总计83,437美元,其中麻醉学、急诊医学和外科学分别为22,776美元、31,764美元和28,897美元。按每位住院医师平均395.44美元计算,密歇根大学医学院每年的CCC总成本推算为404,531美元。
尽管里程碑制度已实施十多年,但CCC流程仍不能令教员满意,且带来了巨大的机构成本。仍需要采用其他方法来改进住院医师能力评估流程。