Raslan Ismail R, Chu Anna, Austin Peter C, Wang Xuesong, Bobrowski David, Doumouras Barbara S, Lee Joseph J, McNaughton Candace D, Kavsak Peter A, Abdel-Qadir Husam, Ross Heather J, Lee Douglas S
University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Cardiac Sciences, King Fahad Cardiac Center, College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
CJC Open. 2025 Jan 7;7(4):390-401. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2025.01.002. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Tests of natriuretic peptide (NP) concentrations are guideline-recommended for diagnosis and prognostication in heart failure (HF). Although NP testing is available at some hospitals, outpatient access has been limited to those who can pay out-of-pocket. We investigated whether residents who have lower socioeconomic status have differential access to NP testing.
Using a case-control design, we compared patients who had NP tests with age-matched patients undergoing non-NP blood tests (January 2015-June 2020), performed in the outpatient or acute hospital setting. The association of socioeconomic status measures (eg, deprivation quintile) with receipt of NP testing was assessed using conditional logistic regression, adjusted for sex, test location, and comorbidities, and was stratified by incidence of prior HF.
Among 96,919 patients without prior HF (median age, 72 years; 50% female) who underwent NP testing, the majority of tests (66.6%) were performed in an acute hospital setting rather than in an outpatient clinic. Residents of more-deprived neighbourhoods had a higher incidence of HF ( < 0.001), but they were more likely to undergo NP testing in an acute care setting (odds ratio [OR] for most- vs least-deprived, 1.269; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.104-1.216) and less likely to undergo testing as outpatients (OR, 0.807; 95% CI, 0.764-0.853 vs least-deprived; all < 0.001). Among 70,362 matched patients with known HF (median aged, 78 years; 45% female), outpatient NP testing was also less likely to be performed among patients living in the most-deprived neighbourhoods (OR, 0.723; 95% CI, 0.677-0.772; < 0.001).
Although those of lower socioeconomic status exhibit a higher risk of incident HF, they had less NP testing performed in outpatient settings, and more testing performed in resource-intense acute-care settings.
利钠肽(NP)浓度检测是心力衰竭(HF)诊断和预后评估的指南推荐项目。尽管一些医院可进行NP检测,但门诊检测仅限于那些能够自掏腰包的患者。我们调查了社会经济地位较低的居民在NP检测方面是否存在差异。
采用病例对照设计,我们将接受NP检测的患者与年龄匹配的接受非NP血液检测的患者(2015年1月至2020年6月)进行比较,这些检测在门诊或急症医院环境中进行。使用条件逻辑回归评估社会经济地位指标(如贫困五分位数)与接受NP检测之间的关联,并对性别、检测地点和合并症进行调整,并按既往HF的发生率进行分层。
在96919例无既往HF的患者(年龄中位数72岁;50%为女性)中,接受NP检测的患者中,大多数检测(66.6%)是在急症医院环境中进行,而非门诊诊所。贫困社区居民的HF发生率较高(<0.001),但他们更有可能在急症护理环境中接受NP检测(最贫困与最不贫困者的优势比[OR]为1.269;95%置信区间[CI]为1.104 - 1.216),而作为门诊患者接受检测的可能性较小(OR为0.807;95%CI为0.764 - 0.853,与最不贫困者相比;均<0.001)。在70362例已知HF的匹配患者中(年龄中位数78岁;45%为女性),居住在最贫困社区的患者接受门诊NP检测的可能性也较小(OR为0.723;95%CI为0.677 - 0.772;<0.001)。
尽管社会经济地位较低者发生HF的风险较高,但他们在门诊环境中接受的NP检测较少,而在资源密集型的急症护理环境中接受的检测较多。