Tetreault Hannah M, Zingerman Zoe, Hill Lisa, Ibrahim Shaimaa, Maschinski Joyce, Heineman Katherine D, Walters Christina
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) National Laboratory for Genetic Resources Preservation, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Center for Plant Conservation, Escondido, CA, United States.
Front Plant Sci. 2025 May 13;16:1585631. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1585631. eCollection 2025.
Dry seeds do not show obvious signs of life and so testing for viability, health and life expectancy can be challenging. Usually testing seed quality involves adding water and measuring metabolic capacity or growth potential by vital staining or germination assays. Importantly, most laboratory seed tests are intended to assay immediate viability, while most genebanks need tests that predict seed performance in the distant future. All currently available assays require considerable a priori knowledge of germination conditions and seeds large enough to dissect. Germination conditions are often unknown for seeds produced from wild species and are an important criterion for seed testing.
Using standardized methods (i.e., commercially available kits) we tested the feasibility of adapting a new seed quality assay that measures RNA integrity and is promising for cultivated species, to seeds from wild species. Most of the 100 wild species we include are rare or endangered and in need of preservation through genebanking. To determine the feasibility of measuring RNA integrity in seeds from wild populations, we compared the quality of RNA extracted from seeds that were recently harvested to those of the same species that have been genebanked for 16 to 41 years, with various seed traits examined for interference with RNA extraction and characterization.
We demonstrate reliable characterization of RNA quality across a diverse group of plants, despite variation in germination requirements, seed morphology or composition. RIN (RNA Integrity Number) values were usually high across all samples and variables, attesting to both the quality of newly collected material as well as its maintenance under genebanking conditions. This study conclusively demonstrates the feasibility of reliably extracting and characterizing RNA from dry seeds collected from wild populations, regardless of a variety of seed traits and morphologies. Relationships between RNA quality and seed age and viability require further exploration.
干燥的种子不会表现出明显的生命迹象,因此检测其活力、健康状况和预期寿命可能具有挑战性。通常,检测种子质量需要加水,并通过活体染色或发芽试验来测量代谢能力或生长潜力。重要的是,大多数实验室种子检测旨在测定即时活力,而大多数基因库需要能够预测种子在遥远未来表现的检测。目前所有可用的检测方法都需要对发芽条件有相当多的先验知识,并且需要足够大的种子以便进行解剖。对于野生植物产生的种子,发芽条件往往未知,而这是种子检测的一个重要标准。
我们使用标准化方法(即市售试剂盒),测试了一种新的种子质量检测方法应用于野生植物种子的可行性,该方法测量RNA完整性,对栽培植物种子很有前景。我们纳入的100种野生植物大多稀有或濒危,需要通过基因库保存。为了确定测量野生种群种子中RNA完整性的可行性,我们比较了从最近收获的种子中提取的RNA质量与同一物种已在基因库保存16至41年的种子的RNA质量,并检查了各种种子性状对RNA提取和表征的干扰。
尽管发芽要求、种子形态或组成存在差异,我们仍证明了在不同植物群体中对RNA质量进行可靠表征。在所有样本和变量中,RIN(RNA完整性数值)值通常都很高,这证明了新采集材料的质量以及其在基因库条件下的保存情况。这项研究最终证明了从野生种群收集的干燥种子中可靠提取和表征RNA的可行性,无论种子有各种性状和形态。RNA质量与种子年龄和活力之间的关系需要进一步探索。