• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的安全性和有效性。

The safety and effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

作者信息

Wang Wei, Guo Zhao, Yang Lixin, Liu Jianning, Li Zhiyong, Li Jiaqi, Zhao Hong, Sun Tao

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2025 May 13;12:1598531. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1598531. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1598531
PMID:40433236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12106368/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to discuss the safety and effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

METHODS

From August 2018 to December 2021, patients with lumbar disc herniation who received TLIF treatment were included in this study. Clinical data collected during both the preoperative period and the 2-year postoperative follow-up were analyzed. The correlations between preoperative clinical indicators and postoperative functional outcomes were modeled using both univariate regression and multivariable-adjusted analyses.

RESULT

The study population comprised 547 consecutive cases (male: 261, 47.7%; female: 286, 52.3%). Stratified outcome analysis showed 458 patients (83.7%) attained optimal surgical recovery without detectable morbidity, contrasted with 89 cases (16.3%) manifesting postoperative complications. The univariate analysis of postoperative complications found that the recurrence of symptoms was related to body mass index (BMI), preoperative pain time, High-level segment, intraoperative bleeding volume and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS)-back. Postoperative hematoma was related to hypertension and wound drainage. Poor wound healing was related to BMI and Wound drainage volume. However, this study failed to find the related factors of wound infection. After binary logistic analysis of the above single factors, we found that BMI and preoperative pain time were independent risk factors for symptom recurrence, and BMI were independent risk factors for Poor wound healing.

CONCLUSION

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery can safely and effectively treat lumbar disc herniation.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的安全性和有效性。

方法

纳入2018年8月至2021年12月接受TLIF治疗的腰椎间盘突出症患者。分析术前及术后2年随访期间收集的临床资料。采用单因素回归和多变量调整分析对术前临床指标与术后功能结局之间的相关性进行建模。

结果

研究人群包括547例连续病例(男性:261例,47.7%;女性:286例,52.3%)。分层结局分析显示,458例患者(83.7%)获得了最佳手术恢复且无明显并发症,相比之下,89例患者(16.3%)出现了术后并发症。术后并发症的单因素分析发现,症状复发与体重指数(BMI)、术前疼痛时间、高位节段、术中出血量和术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)背部有关。术后血肿与高血压和伤口引流有关。伤口愈合不良与BMI和伤口引流量有关。然而,本研究未发现伤口感染的相关因素。对上述单因素进行二元逻辑分析后,我们发现BMI和术前疼痛时间是症状复发的独立危险因素,BMI是伤口愈合不良的独立危险因素。

结论

经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合手术能够安全有效地治疗腰椎间盘突出症。

相似文献

1
The safety and effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎间盘突出症的安全性和有效性。
Front Surg. 2025 May 13;12:1598531. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1598531. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical Effect of Minimally Invasive Microendoscopic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation.微创经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):3300-3312. doi: 10.1111/os.13443. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
3
[Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis combined with intervertebral disc herniation].单侧双通道内镜下腰椎椎间融合术与内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症合并椎间盘突出症的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 15;37(9):1098-1105. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202303095.
4
Clinical efficacy and complications of MIS-TLIF and TLIF in the treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation: a comparative study.微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)与经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)治疗高位腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效及并发症:一项对比研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 May 28;19(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04806-9.
5
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single segmental lumbar disc herniation: A meta-analysis.微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(3):505-516. doi: 10.3233/BMR-210004.
6
[Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive tubular transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease].单侧双孔通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与微创管状经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 May 15;36(5):592-599. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202201005.
7
Risk factors and prevention strategy for patient dissatisfaction after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center retrospective study.经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后患者不满的危险因素及预防策略:一项单中心回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2025 Feb 11;12:1545591. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1545591. eCollection 2025.
8
[Comparison of mid-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with three-dimensional microscope in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis].[单侧双通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与三维显微镜辅助下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的中期疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Jan 15;37(1):52-58. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202210017.
9
Comparison Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Biradicular Symptoms.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗双根症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e72-e79. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.146. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
10
[Comparison of clinical effect and muscle injury imaging between oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及肌肉损伤影像学比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2023 May 25;36(5):420-7. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.05.005.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of obesity on the CCR6-CCL20 axis in epidermal γδ T cells and IL-17A production in murine wound healing and psoriasis.肥胖对小鼠伤口愈合和银屑病中表皮γδ T细胞CCR6-CCL20轴及IL-17A产生的影响。
J Immunol. 2025 Jan 1;214(1):153-166. doi: 10.1093/jimmun/vkae011.
2
Clinical efficacy and complications of MIS-TLIF and TLIF in the treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation: a comparative study.微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)与经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)治疗高位腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效及并发症:一项对比研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 May 28;19(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04806-9.
3
Effect of the administration route on the hemostatic efficacy of tranexamic acid in patients undergoing short-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
administration 途径对行短节段后路腰椎间融合术患者氨甲环酸止血效果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 May 17;41(2):224-235. doi: 10.3171/2024.2.SPINE23779. Print 2024 Aug 1.
4
Do TLIF and PLIF Techniques Differ in Perioperative Complications? - Comparison of Complications Rates of Two High Volume Centers.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)和后路腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF)在围手术期并发症方面是否存在差异?——两个高手术量中心并发症发生率的比较。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jan;15(1):84-93. doi: 10.1177/21925682241248095. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
5
Understanding wound healing in obesity.了解肥胖症中的伤口愈合。
World J Exp Med. 2024 Mar 20;14(1):86898. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v14.i1.86898.
6
Nomogram for predicting surgical site infections in elderly patients after open lumbar spine surgery: A retrospective study.预测老年患者腰椎后路手术后手术部位感染的列线图:一项回顾性研究。
Int Wound J. 2024 Mar;21(3):e14734. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14734.
7
Risk factors for surgical site infection after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术术后手术部位感染的危险因素。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14605. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14605. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
8
Adjuvant Tranexamic Acid for Reducing Postoperative Recurrence of Chronic Subdural Hematoma in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.辅助氨甲环酸减少老年慢性硬脑膜下血肿术后复发的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Feb;182:e829-e836. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.054. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
9
A commentary on 'Risk factors of epidural hematoma in patients undergoing spinal surgery: a meta-analysis of 29 cohort studies'.关于“脊柱手术患者硬膜外血肿的危险因素:29项队列研究的荟萃分析”的述评
Int J Surg. 2024 Mar 1;110(3):1846-1847. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001009.
10
The efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.氨甲环酸在经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Dec 1;8(12):919-925. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0168.