Suppr超能文献

健康证券化如何塑造卫生系统的优先事项:一项实在论综合研究。

How health securitisation shapes health system priorities: A realist synthesis.

作者信息

Akhavein Delaram, Sheel Meru, Abimbola Seye

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 28;5(5):e0004677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004677. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Health securitisation - i.e., framing health issues as security issues or as threats- is growing in contemporary global health discourse. Given the power disparity between the actors who can frame a health issue or on whose behalf issues are framed and the actors who may experience the consequences of such framing, it is crucial to understand how 'health security' framing impacts health system prioritisation. We conducted a realist synthesis on how ("mechanism") and under what conditions ("context") health securitisation impacts health system priorities ("outcome") at different levels of health governance. To capture contemporary analyses, we searched the SCOPUS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Global Health databases for articles published from 2010 to 2023. We included 51 articles in the realist synthesis: empirical studies and conceptual analyses on the effects of health securitisation (and associated security-oriented policies, practices and measures), even if implicitly, on health system priorities. Through the synthesis, we identified five mechanisms by which 'health security' framing is adopted in response to an event - 'uncertainty' (managing the ambiguity of risks), 'self-protection' (safeguarding own group/national interests), 'self-reliance' (projecting own ability to be autonomous), 'self-preservation' (preserving own institutional credibility), and 'norm-setting' (entrenching long-term policy shifts). We also identified contextual factors (e.g., similar past events, inequities between groups/nations, militarisation of governance, donor influence, geopolitical interests) that influence these mechanisms to generate outcomes in the form of priorities (e.g., mobilisation of funds, overemphasis on one disease or approach over others, abuse of power that disproportionately impact marginalised individuals, groups, and nations). Each mechanism is influenced by a set of contextual factors which are peculiar to a place and time. Understanding these links between context, mechanism, and outcome can allow for a closer examination and anticipation of 'health security' framing and its impact on prioritisation in different settings globally.

摘要

健康安全化——即将健康问题界定为安全问题或威胁——在当代全球健康话语中日益凸显。鉴于能够界定健康问题或代表他人界定问题的行为体与可能承受此类界定后果的行为体之间存在权力差距,了解“健康安全”界定如何影响卫生系统的优先事项安排至关重要。我们针对健康安全化如何(“机制”)以及在何种条件下(“背景”)在不同层次的卫生治理中影响卫生系统优先事项(“结果”)进行了一项实在论综合分析。为获取当代分析资料,我们在SCOPUS、MEDLINE、EMBASE和全球健康数据库中检索了2010年至2023年发表的文章。我们在实在论综合分析中纳入了51篇文章:关于健康安全化(以及相关的以安全为导向的政策、实践和措施)对卫生系统优先事项的影响(即使是隐含影响)的实证研究和概念分析。通过综合分析,我们确定了应对某一事件时采用“健康安全”界定的五种机制——“不确定性”(管理风险的模糊性)、“自我保护”(维护自身群体/国家利益)、“自力更生”(展示自身自主能力)、“自我保全”(维护自身机构信誉)和“规范设定”(确立长期政策转变)。我们还确定了影响这些机制以优先事项形式产生结果的背景因素(例如,过去的类似事件、群体/国家之间的不平等、治理的军事化、捐助方影响、地缘政治利益)(例如,资金筹集、对一种疾病或方法的过度强调超过其他疾病或方法、权力滥用对边缘化个人、群体和国家产生不成比例的影响)。每种机制都受到一系列特定于某个地点和时间的背景因素的影响。了解背景、机制和结果之间的这些联系有助于更深入地审视和预测“健康安全”界定及其对全球不同环境中优先事项安排的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7207/12118837/b47a8e020d44/pgph.0004677.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验