• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者及其照护者的慢性心力衰竭康复赋能促进自我护理康复干预的临床有效性和成本效益:一项多中心随机对照试验(REACH-HFpEF试验)的原理和方案

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the rehabilitation enablement in chronic heart failure facilitated self-care rehabilitation intervention for people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and their caregivers: rationale and protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial - REACH-HFpEF trial.

作者信息

Taylor Rod S, Burrell Emma, O'Hare Claire, Thomson Elizabeth A, Placzek Anna, Bollen Jessica C, Cleland John G F, Cowie Aynsley, Dalal Hasnain M, Deaton Christi, Doherty Patrick J, Dudman Katie, Fraser Heather, Frost Julia, Greaves Colin, Hartshorne-Evans Nick, Hillsdon Melvyn, Ibbotson Tracy, Jarallah Mohammad, Jolly Kate, McConnachie Alex, McIntosh Emma, Smith Valerie, Squire Iain, Taylor Louise, van Beurden Samantha, Lang Chim C

机构信息

School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

School of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 May 27;15(5):e094254. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094254.

DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094254
PMID:40436450
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12121609/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common and causes functional limitation, poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and impairs prognosis. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is a promising intervention for HFpEF, but there is currently insufficient evidence to support its routine use. This trial will assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a 12-week health professional-facilitated, home-based rehabilitation intervention (REACH-HF), in people with HFpEF, for participants and their caregivers.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

REACH-HFpEF is a parallel two group multicentre randomised controlled trial with 1:1 individual allocation to the REACH-HF intervention plus usual care (intervention group) or usual care alone (control group) with a target sample size of 372 participants with HFpEF and their caregivers recruited from secondary care centres in United Kingdom. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis will be performed blinded; outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 4-month and 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome measure will be patients' disease-specific HRQoL, measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include patient's exercise capacity, psychological well-being, level of physical activity, generic HRQoL, self-management, frailty, blood biomarkers, mortality, hospitalisations, and serious adverse events, and caregiver's HRQoL and burden. A process evaluation and substudy will assess the fidelity of intervention delivery and adherence to the home-based exercise regime and explore potential mediators and moderators of changes in HRQoL with the intervention. Qualitative studies will describe facilitators' experiences of delivery of the intervention. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of the REACH-HF intervention in participants with HFpEF will estimate incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year at 12 months. The CEA will be conducted from a UK NHS and Personal Social Services perspective and a wider societal perspective. The adequacy of trial recruitment in an initial 6-month internal pilot period will also be checked.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is approved by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (ref 21/WS/0085). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journal publication and conference presentations to researchers, service users and policymakers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN47894539.

摘要

引言

射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)很常见,会导致功能受限、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)较差并影响预后。基于运动的心脏康复对HFpEF来说是一种有前景的干预措施,但目前尚无足够证据支持其常规使用。本试验将评估一项为期12周、由健康专业人员指导的居家康复干预措施(REACH-HF)对HFpEF患者及其照护者的临床效果和成本效益。

方法与分析

REACH-HFpEF是一项平行两组多中心随机对照试验,按1:1的比例将个体分配至REACH-HF干预加常规护理组(干预组)或仅常规护理组(对照组),目标样本量为372名HFpEF患者及其照护者,从英国二级护理中心招募。结局评估和统计分析将采用盲法进行;将在基线、4个月和12个月随访时评估结局。主要结局指标将是12个月时使用明尼苏达心力衰竭生活问卷测量的患者特定疾病HRQoL。次要结局包括患者的运动能力、心理健康、身体活动水平、一般HRQoL、自我管理、衰弱、血液生物标志物、死亡率、住院情况和严重不良事件,以及照护者的HRQoL和负担。一项过程评估和子研究将评估干预实施的保真度以及对居家运动方案的依从性,并探索干预导致HRQoL变化的潜在中介因素和调节因素。定性研究将描述干预实施者的经历。对HFpEF患者中REACH-HF干预的成本效益分析(CEA)将估计12个月时每质量调整生命年的增量成本。CEA将从英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)和个人社会服务角度以及更广泛的社会角度进行。还将检查初始6个月内部预试验期内试验招募的充分性。

伦理与传播

本研究已获苏格兰西部研究伦理委员会批准(参考号21/WS/0085)。研究结果将通过同行评审期刊发表和会议报告的形式传播给研究人员、服务使用者和政策制定者。

试验注册号

ISRCTN47894539。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b75/12121609/173807424366/bmjopen-15-5-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b75/12121609/4117d3f42a3f/bmjopen-15-5-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b75/12121609/b3365781dd33/bmjopen-15-5-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b75/12121609/173807424366/bmjopen-15-5-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b75/12121609/4117d3f42a3f/bmjopen-15-5-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b75/12121609/b3365781dd33/bmjopen-15-5-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b75/12121609/173807424366/bmjopen-15-5-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the rehabilitation enablement in chronic heart failure facilitated self-care rehabilitation intervention for people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and their caregivers: rationale and protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial - REACH-HFpEF trial.射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者及其照护者的慢性心力衰竭康复赋能促进自我护理康复干预的临床有效性和成本效益:一项多中心随机对照试验(REACH-HFpEF试验)的原理和方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 27;15(5):e094254. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094254.
2
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Rehabilitation Enablement in Chronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) facilitated self-care rehabilitation intervention in heart failure patients and caregivers: rationale and protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.慢性心力衰竭康复促进(REACH-HF)对心力衰竭患者及其照护者的自我护理康复干预的临床有效性和成本效益:一项多中心随机对照试验的原理与方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 23;5(12):e009994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009994.
3
Rehabilitation Enablement in Chronic Heart Failure-a facilitated self-care rehabilitation intervention in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (REACH-HFpEF) and their caregivers: rationale and protocol for a single-centre pilot randomised controlled trial.慢性心力衰竭的康复赋能——一项针对射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者(REACH-HFpEF)及其照护者的促进自我护理康复干预:单中心试点随机对照试验的原理与方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 25;6(10):e012853. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012853.
4
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Patient education in the management of coronary heart disease.冠心病管理中的患者教育
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 28;6(6):CD008895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008895.pub3.
7
8
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

本文引用的文献

1
Supervised exercise training in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.射血分数保留的心力衰竭的监督运动训练:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Apr;49(4):102426. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102426. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
2
2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.《2021年欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南》2023年聚焦更新
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 1;44(37):3627-3639. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195.
3
Cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure: 'Cinderella' or evidence-based pillar of care?
心力衰竭的心脏康复:“灰姑娘”还是基于证据的治疗基石?
Eur Heart J. 2023 May 1;44(17):1511-1518. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad118.
4
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force.《健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)》2022 年解释与详述:ISPOR CHEERS II 良好实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2022 Jan;25(1):10-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.008.
5
Empagliflozin in Heart Failure with a Preserved Ejection Fraction.恩格列净治疗射血分数保留的心力衰竭。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 14;385(16):1451-1461. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107038. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
6
Validity and Reliability of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 2.心力衰竭自我护理贡献者量表 2 版的有效性和可靠性。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 May/Jun;35(3):280-290. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000655.
7
Integrating quantitative and qualitative data and findings when undertaking randomised controlled trials.在进行随机对照试验时,整合定量和定性数据及发现。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 26;9(11):e032081. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032081.
8
Practical help for specifying the target difference in sample size calculations for RCTs: the DELTA five-stage study, including a workshop.RCT 样本量计算中目标差值指定的实用帮助:DELTA 五阶段研究,包括研讨会。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(60):1-88. doi: 10.3310/hta23600.
9
The cost effectiveness of REACH-HF and home-based cardiac rehabilitation compared with the usual medical care for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A decision model-based analysis.REACH-HF 与家庭心脏康复治疗相比于射血分数降低的心力衰竭的常规医疗的成本效益:基于决策模型的分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 Aug;26(12):1252-1261. doi: 10.1177/2047487319833507. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire.明尼苏达心力衰竭生活质量问卷的反应性和最小临床重要差异。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Feb 14;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1104-2.