Martins Summer L, Miller Jill, Mahoney Madeline, Tessier Katelyn M, Traxler Sarah A, Boraas Christy M
Allina Health, 2925 Chicago Avenue, MS 10105, Minneapolis, MN, 55407, USA.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women's Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Moos Tower, 12th floor, 515 Delaware St., Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Contracept Reprod Med. 2025 May 28;10(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40834-025-00371-6.
Medication abortion (MAB) accounts for an increasing proportion of in-clinic abortions in the United States and poses unique considerations for provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Studies of LARC initiation among MAB patients mostly consist of trials where financial barriers to LARC were removed. We sought to identify correlates of LARC initiation post-MAB in a community-based setting.
This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who presented to a Planned Parenthood Health Center in Minnesota in 2016 for MAB, chose LARC as their intended post-abortion contraceptive method in counseling, and returned to the clinic for their routine follow-up visit (n = 335). We abstracted sociodemographic and reproductive health history variables and used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for LARC initiation post-abortion (≤ 30 days of mifepristone administration).
Study participants predominantly self-identified as non-Hispanic and White and had a mean age of 26 years. Overall, 72.8% (n = 244) initiated their desired LARC method by 30 days post-abortion. There was no significant (p < 0.05) association between LARC initiation and most variables: race, ethnicity, age, distance from clinic, body mass index, gestational age, gravidity, prior abortions, and number of children. However, odds of LARC initiation were significantly lower among participants who did not use any health insurance (vs. private insurance) for contraceptive coverage at their MAB follow-up visit (age-adjusted OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.69). Findings were similar for initiation of the IUD, specifically (age-adjusted OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.97), but not statistically significant for the implant.
Lack of health insurance may be a barrier to LARC initiation for MAB patients. Facilitators of LARC initiation in the context of MAB remain unclear and warrant further research to optimize patient-centered care.
药物流产在美国门诊流产中所占比例日益增加,在提供长效可逆避孕方法(LARC)方面存在独特的考量。关于药物流产患者启动LARC的研究大多是在消除了LARC的经济障碍的试验中进行的。我们试图在社区环境中确定药物流产后启动LARC的相关因素。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2016年在明尼苏达州计划生育健康中心接受药物流产的患者,他们在咨询中选择LARC作为流产后的避孕方法,并返回诊所进行常规随访(n = 335)。我们提取了社会人口统计学和生殖健康史变量,并使用逻辑回归来估计流产后(米非司酮给药后≤30天)启动LARC的比值比(OR)。
研究参与者主要自我认定为非西班牙裔白人,平均年龄为26岁。总体而言,72.8%(n = 244)的参与者在流产后30天内启动了他们期望的LARC方法。LARC启动与大多数变量之间无显著(p < 0.05)关联:种族、民族、年龄、离诊所的距离、体重指数、孕周、妊娠次数、既往流产史和子女数量。然而,在药物流产随访中未使用任何医疗保险(与私人保险相比)进行避孕覆盖的参与者中,启动LARC的几率显著较低(年龄调整后的OR为0.35,95%CI为0.18 - 0.69)。对于宫内节育器的启动,结果相似(具体为年龄调整后的OR为0.42,95%CI为0.18 - 0.97),但对于皮下埋植剂则无统计学意义。
缺乏医疗保险可能是药物流产患者启动LARC的障碍。在药物流产背景下启动LARC的促进因素仍不明确,需要进一步研究以优化以患者为中心的护理。