• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

独立堕胎服务提供者为应对新冠疫情而采用无检测和远程医疗药物流产护理。

Adoption of no-test and telehealth medication abortion care among independent abortion providers in response to COVID-19.

作者信息

Upadhyay Ushma D, Schroeder Rosalyn, Roberts Sarah C M

机构信息

Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Dept. of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94612.

出版信息

Contracept X. 2020 Nov 21;2:100049. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100049. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1016/j.conx.2020.100049
PMID:33305255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7718446/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Access to abortion care in the United States (US) is restricted by numerous logistical and financial barriers, which have been further intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to understand the ways in which COVID-19 prompted changes in clinical practices in abortion care among independent abortion clinics.

STUDY DESIGN

We surveyed independent US abortion clinics and documented changes in practice regarding the provision of abortion since March 1, 2020.

RESULTS

Among about 153 independent clinics invited, 100 clinics contributed relevant data and were included in the analytic sample. A total of 87% reported changes in protocols in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Reported changes included moving to telehealth (phone or video) for follow-up (71%), starting or increasing telehealth for patient consultations and screening (41%), reducing Rh testing (43%) and other tests (42%), and omitting the preabortion ultrasound (15%). A total of 20% reported allowing quick pickup of medication abortion pills, and 4% began mailing medications directly to patients after a telehealth consultation. Clinical practice changes were reported throughout all regions of the US, but facilities in the Northeast (73%) were more likely to report starting or increasing telehealth than facilities in the South (23%, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated use of telehealth among independent abortion clinics, but many clinics, particularly those in the South, have been unable to make these changes. Other practices such as reducing preabortion ultrasounds were less common in all regions despite clinical guidelines and evidence supporting such changes in practice and positive benefits for public health and patient-centered care.

IMPLICATIONS

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a window of opportunity to remove barriers to abortion, including expanding telehealth and reducing preabortion tests. Clinics can strive for a culture shift towards simplifying the provision of medication abortion and routinely avoiding preabortion tests and in-person visits. Such changes in practice could have positive benefits for public health and patient-centered care.

摘要

目的

在美国,获得堕胎护理受到众多后勤和经济障碍的限制,而新冠疫情进一步加剧了这些障碍。我们试图了解新冠疫情促使独立堕胎诊所的堕胎护理临床实践发生变化的方式。

研究设计

我们对美国独立堕胎诊所进行了调查,并记录了自2020年3月1日以来堕胎服务提供方面的实践变化。

结果

在约153家受邀的独立诊所中,100家诊所提供了相关数据并被纳入分析样本。共有87%的诊所报告称,为应对新冠疫情,其协议发生了变化。报告的变化包括转向远程医疗(电话或视频)进行随访(71%)、开始或增加远程医疗进行患者咨询和筛查(41%)、减少Rh检测(43%)和其他检测(42%),以及省略堕胎前超声检查(15%)。共有20%的诊所报告允许快速领取药物流产药片,4%的诊所开始在远程医疗咨询后直接将药物邮寄给患者。美国所有地区都报告了临床实践的变化,但东北部的机构(73%)比南部的机构(23%,p<0.001)更有可能报告开始或增加远程医疗服务。

结论

新冠疫情加速了独立堕胎诊所对远程医疗的使用,但许多诊所,尤其是南部的诊所,无法做出这些改变。尽管临床指南和证据支持这种实践变化以及对公共卫生和以患者为中心的护理有积极益处,但减少堕胎前超声检查等其他实践在所有地区都不太常见。

启示

新冠疫情创造了一个消除堕胎障碍的机会之窗,包括扩大远程医疗和减少堕胎前检测。诊所可以努力实现文化转变,简化药物流产的提供流程,常规性地避免堕胎前检测和面对面就诊。这种实践变化可能对公共卫生和以患者为中心的护理产生积极益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a9/7718446/45916f7e83ac/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a9/7718446/45916f7e83ac/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a9/7718446/45916f7e83ac/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Adoption of no-test and telehealth medication abortion care among independent abortion providers in response to COVID-19.独立堕胎服务提供者为应对新冠疫情而采用无检测和远程医疗药物流产护理。
Contracept X. 2020 Nov 21;2:100049. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100049. eCollection 2020.
2
Abortion service availability during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from a national census of abortion facilities in the U.S.新冠疫情期间美国堕胎服务的可及性:美国堕胎机构全国普查结果
Contracept X. 2021;3:100067. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2021.100067. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
3
Factors associated with successful implementation of telehealth abortion in 4 United States clinical practice settings.与美国 4 个临床实践环境中成功实施远程医疗流产相关的因素。
Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.021. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
4
Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.药物流产临床实践因应 COVID-19 大流行而作出的改变。
Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Remote Delivery in Reproductive Health Care: Operation of Direct-to-Patient Telehealth Medication Abortion Services in Diverse Settings.远程生殖保健服务:不同环境下直接面向患者的远程医疗药物流产服务的运作。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Jul-Aug;20(4):336-342. doi: 10.1370/afm.2821. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
6
Federal, state, and institutional barriers to the expansion of medication and telemedicine abortion services in Ohio, Kentucky, and West Virginia during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,俄亥俄州、肯塔基州和西弗吉尼亚州在扩大药物和远程医疗堕胎服务方面面临联邦、州和机构障碍。
Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.020. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
7
Outcomes and Safety of History-Based Screening for Medication Abortion: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.基于病史的药物流产筛查的结局和安全性:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 May 1;182(5):482-491. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0217.
8
COVID-19 and Independent Abortion Providers: Findings from a Rapid-Response Survey.COVID-19 与独立堕胎提供者:快速反应调查的结果。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Dec;52(4):217-225. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12163. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
9
Addressing Structural Inequities, a Necessary Step Toward Ensuring Equitable Access to Telehealth for Medication Abortion Care During and Post COVID-19.解决结构性不平等问题,是在新冠疫情期间及之后确保药物流产护理远程医疗公平可及的必要步骤。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Mar 17;3:805767. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.805767. eCollection 2022.
10
Integrating mifepristone into primary care in Canada's capital: A multi-methods exploration of the Medical Abortion Access Project.将米非司酮纳入加拿大首都的初级保健:医疗流产准入项目的多方法探索。
Contraception. 2022 May;109:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
No-Test Screening Protocols May Disproportionately Exclude Structurally Oppressed Communities Who Could Benefit from Accessing Medication Abortion.无检测筛查方案可能会不成比例地排除那些能够从药物流产中获益的受结构性压迫的群体。
Health Equity. 2025 Mar 26;9(1):189-200. doi: 10.1089/heq.2024.0128. eCollection 2025.
2
Long-acting reversible contraception initiation after medication abortion: a retrospective cohort study.药物流产后长效可逆避孕方法的启动:一项回顾性队列研究
Contracept Reprod Med. 2025 May 28;10(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40834-025-00371-6.
3
Changes in local access to mifepristone dispensed by community pharmacies for medication abortion in Ontario: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 and Independent Abortion Providers: Findings from a Rapid-Response Survey.COVID-19 与独立堕胎提供者:快速反应调查的结果。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Dec;52(4):217-225. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12163. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
2
The legal and medical necessity of abortion care amid the COVID-19 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间堕胎护理的法律和医学必要性。
J Law Biosci. 2020 Apr 29;7(1):lsaa013. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa013. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
3
Trauma-Informed Perinatal Healthcare for Survivors of Sexual Violence.为性暴力幸存者提供的创伤知情围产期医疗保健。
安大略省社区药房发放用于药物流产的米非司酮的本地可及性变化:一项基于人群的重复横断面研究。
CMAJ. 2025 Apr 6;197(13):E345-E354. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.241505.
4
Identifying Health Services Preferences for a Community-Based HIV Status-Neutral Mobile Clinic Among Marginalized Populations in Oakland, CA: A Maximum-Difference Analysis.确定加利福尼亚州奥克兰市边缘化人群对基于社区的艾滋病病毒状态中立移动诊所的医疗服务偏好:最大差异分析
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2025;36(3):215-226. doi: 10.1097/JNC.0000000000000530. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
5
The Role of Medication Abortion Provision in US States Without Total Abortion Bans, 2023.2023年美国未全面禁止堕胎的州药物流产服务的作用
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):3-7. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12294. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
6
Perspectives on Abortion Services, the Pre-Abortion Visit, and Telemedicine Abortion: A Qualitative Study in Sweden.堕胎服务、堕胎前问诊及远程医疗堕胎的相关观点:瑞典的一项定性研究
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):36-44. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12290. Epub 2025 Jan 12.
7
Pricing of medication abortion in the United States, 2021-2023.2021-2023 年美国药物流产的定价。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):282-294. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12280. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
8
Abortion Training in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A National Survey of Program Directors 5 Months After the Dobbs Decision.家庭医学住院医师培训项目中的堕胎培训:多布斯裁决 5 个月后对项目主任的全国调查。
Fam Med. 2024 Apr;56(4):242-249. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.683874. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
9
Experiences seeking, sourcing, and using abortion pills at home in the United States through an online telemedicine service.在美国,通过在线远程医疗服务在家中获取、采购和使用堕胎药的经历。
SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100075. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
10
Medication abortion via digital health in the United States: a systematic scoping review.美国通过数字健康进行药物流产:一项系统的范围综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Jul 12;6(1):128. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00871-2.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2020 Jul/Sep;34(3):199-202. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000501.
4
Commentary: No-test medication abortion: A sample protocol for increasing access during a pandemic and beyond.评论:非检测药物流产:大流行期间及之后增加可及性的示例方案。
Contraception. 2020 Jun;101(6):361-366. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
5
Telemedicine for medication abortion.药物流产的远程医疗
Contraception. 2019 Nov;100(5):351-353. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
6
Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review.远程医疗用于药物流产:系统综述。
BJOG. 2019 Aug;126(9):1094-1102. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15684. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
7
Abortion through telemedicine.通过远程医疗进行堕胎。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;30(6):394-399. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000498.
8
Identifying National Availability of Abortion Care and Distance From Major US Cities: Systematic Online Search.确定堕胎护理的全国可及性以及与美国主要城市的距离:系统在线搜索
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 14;20(5):e186. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9717.
9
Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: a spatial analysis.美国妇女堕胎需要旅行的距离方面的差异和随时间的变化:一项空间分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Nov;2(11):e493-e500. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30158-5. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
10
Innovative models are needed for equitable abortion access in the USA.在美国,需要创新模式来实现公平的堕胎服务。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Nov;2(11):e484-e485. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30181-0. Epub 2017 Oct 3.