Dablainville Valentin, Mornas Adèle, Normand-Gravier Tom, Al-Mulla Maha, Papakostas Emmanouil, Olory Bruno, Fermin Theodorakys Marin, Zampeli Frantzeska, Nader Nelda, Alhammoud Marine, Bayne Freya, Sanchez Anthony M J, Cardinale Marco, Candau Robin, Bernardi Henri, Racinais Sébastien
Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Research and Scientific Support Department, Doha, Qatar.
DMEM, University of Montpellier, INRAE, Montpellier, France.
J Physiol. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1113/JP287777.
Cryotherapy is a popular strategy for the treatment of skeletal muscle injuries. However, its effect on post-injury human muscle regeneration remains unclear. In contrast, promising results recently emerged using heat therapy to facilitate recovery from muscle injury. This study aimed to examine the effect of three different thermal treatments on muscle recovery and regeneration following a simulated injury in humans. Thirty-four participants underwent a muscle damage protocol induced by electrically stimulated eccentric contractions triggering regenerative processes following myofibre necrosis. Thereafter, participants were exposed to daily lower body water immersion for 10 days in cold (CWI, 15 min at 12°C), thermoneutral (TWI, 30 min at 32°C) or hot water immersion (HWI, 60 min at 42°C). Muscle biopsies were sampled before and at +5 (D5) and +11 (D11) days post-damage. None of the water immersions differed in recovery of force-generating capacity (P = 0.108). HWI induced a lower perceived muscle pain than TWI (P = 0.035) and lower levels of circulating creatine kinase (P ≤ 0.012) and myoglobin (P < 0.001) than TWI and CWI. Contrary to our hypothesis, CWI did not improve perceived muscle pain or reduce circulating markers of muscle damage (P ≥ 0.207). Expression of heat shock proteins 27 and 70 was significantly increased in HWI (P < 0.038) at D11 and appeared blunted using CWI. Furthermore, nuclear factor-κB expression significantly increased in all conditions except HWI, while interleukin-10 was upregulated only in HWI at D11 (P = 0.014). In conclusion, our results support the use of HWI but not cold, to improve muscle regeneration following an injury. KEY POINTS: Cryotherapy and heat therapy are popular strategies in the treatment of skeletal muscle injury; however, existing literature is equivocal, and their effects on human muscle regeneration remain unknown. We investigated the effect of three thermal treatments (cold water immersion (CWI): 15 min at 12°C; thermoneutral water immersion (TWI): 30 min at 32°C; or hot water immersion (HWI): 60 min at 42°C) performed daily for 10 days following electrically stimulated eccentric muscle damage inducing regenerative mechanisms. CWI did not improve chronic perceived muscle pain nor reduce circulating markers of muscle damage. HWI limited chronic perceived pain and circulating markers of muscle damage, potentially influenced inflammatory mechanisms, and increased the expression of heat shock proteins. HWI appears more beneficial than CWI in improving muscle regeneration after a muscle injury.
冷冻疗法是治疗骨骼肌损伤的常用策略。然而,其对损伤后人体肌肉再生的影响仍不明确。相比之下,最近有研究表明热疗法有助于促进肌肉损伤的恢复,取得了令人鼓舞的结果。本研究旨在探讨三种不同热疗方法对人体模拟损伤后肌肉恢复和再生的影响。34名参与者接受了由电刺激离心收缩诱导的肌肉损伤方案,该方案会引发肌纤维坏死后的再生过程。此后,参与者每天进行10天的下半身水浸浴,分别为冷水浸浴(CWI,12°C下15分钟)、热中性水浸浴(TWI,32°C下30分钟)或热水浸浴(HWI,42°C下60分钟)。在损伤前以及损伤后第5天(D5)和第11天(D11)采集肌肉活检样本。三种水浸浴方式在力量生成能力的恢复方面没有差异(P = 0.108)。与TWI相比,HWI引起的肌肉疼痛较轻(P = 0.035),且与TWI和CWI相比,HWI使循环中的肌酸激酶水平更低(P≤0.012),肌红蛋白水平更低(P < 0.001)。与我们的假设相反,CWI并未改善肌肉疼痛的感觉,也未降低肌肉损伤的循环标志物水平(P≥0.207)。在D11时,HWI中热休克蛋白27和70的表达显著增加(P < 0.038),而CWI则使其表达减弱。此外,除HWI外,在所有条件下核因子-κB的表达均显著增加,而白细胞介素-10仅在D11时在HWI中上调(P = 0.014)。总之,我们的结果支持使用HWI而非冷冻疗法来促进损伤后的肌肉再生。要点:冷冻疗法和热疗法是治疗骨骼肌损伤的常用策略;然而,现有文献存在矛盾,它们对人体肌肉再生的影响仍不明确。我们研究了在电刺激离心性肌肉损伤诱导再生机制后,每天进行10天的三种热疗方法(冷水浸浴(CWI):12°C下15分钟;热中性水浸浴(TWI):3°C下30分钟;或热水浸浴(HWI):42°C下60分钟)的效果。CWI并未改善慢性肌肉疼痛的感觉,也未降低肌肉损伤的循环标志物水平。HWI减轻了慢性肌肉疼痛和肌肉损伤的循环标志物水平,可能影响了炎症机制,并增加了热休克蛋白的表达。在改善肌肉损伤后的肌肉再生方面,HWI似乎比CWI更有益。