• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于西班牙裔人群戒烟应用程序数字公平差距的叙述性综述。

A Narrative Review of the Digital Equity Gap of Apps for Cigarette Smoking Cessation for Persons Living in the Hispanosphere.

作者信息

Vilardaga Roger, Stoute Charlotte, Rubenstein Dana, Akingbule Oluwatosin, Gray Madeline

机构信息

Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, 525 Vine Street, Winston Salem, NC NC 27101, USA.

Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Curr Addict Rep. 2024 Dec;11(6):1025-1035. doi: 10.1007/s40429-024-00607-6. Epub 2024 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1007/s40429-024-00607-6
PMID:40438616
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12107453/
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The Hispanosphere is a vast region of the world that has received little attention in the digital health literature. No study to date has examined the availability and quality of publicly available mobile applications (apps) for cigarette smoking cessation in this region. Three coders utilized the American Psychiatry Association (APA)'s Brief App Evaluation Model Screener (Brief-AEM Screener) to evaluate the quality of the label and public-facing screens of smoking cessation apps in Spanish. Availability of apps in the Hispanosphere was compared to availability of apps in the Anglosphere.

RECENT FINDINGS

We identified and reviewed 19 apps in Spanish in Google Play. The median score using the Brief-AEM Screener was 63 out of 100 suggesting generally acceptable app quality and features according to the quality standards for digital health tools proposed by the APA. However, we found (1) notable inaccurate and misleading labelling claims, (2) poor grammar or incomplete translations, and (3) a lack of cultural and linguistic adaptation to countries in the Hispanosphere. Our comparison of smoking cessation apps between the Hispanosphere and the Anglosphere suggested that there is a large digital equity gap between these two regions, with a four to sevenfold gap in app availability.

SUMMARY

There is a relative shortage of quality and quantity of digital health apps for smoking cessation in the Hispanosphere. To ensure the cultural appropriateness of those digital interventions, it is essential that developers of digital health tools establish community partners in the region prior to developing apps for smoking cessation.

摘要

综述目的

西班牙语文化圈是世界上一个广大的地区,但在数字健康文献中很少受到关注。迄今为止,尚无研究考察该地区公开可用的戒烟移动应用程序(应用)的可用性和质量。三名编码员利用美国精神病学协会(APA)的简短应用程序评估模型筛选器(Brief-AEM筛选器)来评估西班牙语戒烟应用程序的标签和面向公众屏幕的质量。将西班牙语文化圈中应用的可用性与英语文化圈中应用的可用性进行了比较。

最新发现

我们在谷歌应用商店中识别并审查了19款西班牙语应用。使用Brief-AEM筛选器的中位数分数为63分(满分100分),这表明根据APA提出的数字健康工具质量标准,应用质量和功能总体上是可以接受的。然而,我们发现:(1)存在明显不准确和误导性的标签声明;(2)语法不佳或翻译不完整;(3)缺乏针对西班牙语文化圈国家的文化和语言适应性调整。我们对西班牙语文化圈和英语文化圈之间戒烟应用的比较表明,这两个地区之间存在很大的数字公平差距,应用可用性差距为四到七倍。

总结

西班牙语文化圈中用于戒烟的数字健康应用在质量和数量上相对短缺。为确保这些数字干预措施在文化上的适宜性,数字健康工具的开发者在开发戒烟应用之前,在该地区建立社区合作伙伴至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d164/12107453/4dcc418f927c/nihms-2054582-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d164/12107453/2b16c5d7ae22/nihms-2054582-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d164/12107453/d185a42a2d83/nihms-2054582-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d164/12107453/4dcc418f927c/nihms-2054582-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d164/12107453/2b16c5d7ae22/nihms-2054582-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d164/12107453/d185a42a2d83/nihms-2054582-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d164/12107453/4dcc418f927c/nihms-2054582-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Narrative Review of the Digital Equity Gap of Apps for Cigarette Smoking Cessation for Persons Living in the Hispanosphere.关于西班牙裔人群戒烟应用程序数字公平差距的叙述性综述。
Curr Addict Rep. 2024 Dec;11(6):1025-1035. doi: 10.1007/s40429-024-00607-6. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
2
Smartphone Apps for Smoking Cessation: Systematic Framework for App Review and Analysis.智能手机戒烟应用程序:应用程序评估和分析的系统框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 13;25:e45183. doi: 10.2196/45183.
3
Assessing the Quality and Behavior Change Potential of Vaping Cessation Apps: Systematic Search and Assessment.评估电子烟戒烟应用程序的质量和行为改变潜力:系统搜索和评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 15;12:e55177. doi: 10.2196/55177.
4
User Perceptions of E-Cigarette Cessation Apps: Content Analysis of App Reviews.用户对电子烟戒烟应用程序的看法:应用程序评论的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 15;27:e59997. doi: 10.2196/59997.
5
Classification of Smoking Cessation Apps: Quality Review and Content Analysis.戒烟应用程序分类:质量评估与内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Feb 17;10(2):e17268. doi: 10.2196/17268.
6
Mobile applications (apps) for tobacco cessation: Behaviour change potential and heuristic analysis using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS).用于戒烟的移动应用程序:使用移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)的行为改变潜力及启发式分析
F1000Res. 2024 Nov 22;12:1413. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.142038.2. eCollection 2023.
7
The Impact of Digital Health on Smoking Cessation.数字健康对戒烟的影响。
Interact J Med Res. 2023 Mar 15;12:e41182. doi: 10.2196/41182.
8
Evaluation of Two Mobile Health Apps in the Context of Smoking Cessation: Qualitative Study of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Versus Non-CBT-Based Digital Solutions.在戒烟背景下对两款移动健康应用程序的评估:认知行为疗法(CBT)与非基于CBT的数字解决方案的定性研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 18;6(4):e98. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9405.
9
Behavior Change Techniques in Popular Mobile Apps for Smoking Cessation in France: Content Analysis.法国流行戒烟手机应用程序中的行为改变技术:内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 13;9(5):e26082. doi: 10.2196/26082.
10
Facebook apps for smoking cessation: a review of content and adherence to evidence-based guidelines.用于戒烟的脸书应用程序:内容综述及对循证指南的遵循情况
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Sep 9;16(9):e205. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3491.

本文引用的文献

1
Smartphone Apps for Smoking Cessation: Systematic Framework for App Review and Analysis.智能手机戒烟应用程序:应用程序评估和分析的系统框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 13;25:e45183. doi: 10.2196/45183.
2
On the privacy of mental health apps: An empirical investigation and its implications for app development.论心理健康应用程序的隐私问题:一项实证调查及其对应用程序开发的启示。
Empir Softw Eng. 2023;28(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s10664-022-10236-0. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
3
Comparing Reminders Sent via SMS Text Messaging and Email for Improving Adherence to an Electronic Health Program: Randomized Controlled Trial.
通过短信和电子邮件发送提醒以提高电子健康计划依从性的比较:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Mar 18;10(3):e31040. doi: 10.2196/31040.
4
Smoking Cessation Mobile Interventions in Latin America: A Systematic Review.拉丁美洲的戒烟移动干预措施:一项系统综述。
Hisp Health Care Int. 2022 Jun;20(2):122-132. doi: 10.1177/15404153211020410. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
5
Review of Popularity and Quality Standards of Opioid-Related Smartphone Apps.阿片类药物相关智能手机应用程序的受欢迎程度和质量标准综述。
Curr Addict Rep. 2020 Dec;7(4):486-496. doi: 10.1007/s40429-020-00344-6. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
6
Deriving a practical framework for the evaluation of health apps.推导一个用于评估健康应用程序的实用框架。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jun;1(2):e52-e54. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30013-5. Epub 2019 May 23.
7
Efficacy of Smartphone Applications for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.智能手机应用程序戒烟效果的随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Nov 1;180(11):1472-1480. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4055.
8
Actionable health app evaluation: translating expert frameworks into objective metrics.可操作的健康应用程序评估:将专家框架转化为客观指标
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jul 30;3:100. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00312-4. eCollection 2020.
9
Relative effectiveness of a full versus reduced version of the 'Smoke Free' mobile application for smoking cessation: an exploratory randomised controlled trial.“无烟”移动应用程序完整版与简化版在戒烟方面的相对有效性:一项探索性随机对照试验。
F1000Res. 2018 Sep 21;7:1524. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16148.2. eCollection 2018.
10
Integrating implementation and user-centred design strategies to enhance the impact of health services: protocol from a concept mapping study.整合实施和以用户为中心的设计策略,以提高卫生服务的影响力:概念图研究的方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 8;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0403-0.