Suppr超能文献

用户对电子烟戒烟应用程序的看法:应用程序评论的内容分析

User Perceptions of E-Cigarette Cessation Apps: Content Analysis of App Reviews.

作者信息

Rodberg Danielle, Nawara Roula, Taylor Mischa, Struik Laura

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 15;27:e59997. doi: 10.2196/59997.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vaping rates in Canada are continuing to increase. In 2019, 4.7% of Canadians used an electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) in the past 30 days, which rose to 5.8% in 2022. In the same year, young adults aged 20-24 years demonstrated the highest use among Canadians, at 19.7%. Given this, existing interventions are not resulting in the desired outcomes, and smartphone apps have the potential to address this gap. Although limited, current evidence highlights that apps can be an effective cessation support; however, a gap persists in understanding the user experience of vaping cessation apps.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to explore the user experience of vaping cessation apps through an analysis of app reviews. More specifically, this study aimed to identify positive and negative experiences of app users, as well as highlight recommendations from app users to improve the quality of these apps.

METHODS

Vaping cessation apps were identified through searches on the Canadian and US versions of Apple App Store and Android Google Play Store in August 2022. Searches revealed a total of 11 vaping cessation apps with app reviews, which resulted in a total of 310 reviews for analysis. Review material was analyzed using a deductive content analysis approach and divided into the following primary categories: content, functionality, aesthetic, cost, and other. These were further divided into 3 secondary categories (praise, criticism, and recommendations) and various tertiary categories.

RESULTS

The most discussed primary categories were content, functionality and cost. Comments regarding content tended to be positive (n=103, 33.2%), praising features, such as hypnosis audio sessions (n=29, 28.2%) and tracking features. In contrast, comments tended to criticize functionality (n=58, 18.7%), indicating issues with the functioning of an app that either made the whole app unusable (n=29, 50%) or a specific feature unusable (n=28, 48.3%). Reviews regarding cost were mixed, with 27 (8.7%) positive comments, the majority of these encompassing reviewers satisfied with their purchase (n=17, 63%), and 38 (12.3%) negative comments, including individuals both unsatisfied with their purchase (n=15, 39.5%) and unsatisfied with the free version (n=12, 31.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first of its kind to evaluate the user experience with vaping cessation apps via an analysis of app reviews. App developers may benefit from reading our findings to identify areas to focus on when developing and updating apps. Our study forms a basis for the development of future vaping interventions, as well as future studies. Future research should be conducted on vaping cessation interventions with an emphasis on the user experience because there is limited research available for comparison with the promising results from this study.

摘要

背景

加拿大的电子烟使用率持续上升。2019年,4.7%的加拿大人在过去30天内使用过电子烟,这一比例在2022年升至5.8%。同年,20至24岁的年轻人在加拿大人中电子烟使用率最高,为19.7%。鉴于此,现有的干预措施并未产生预期效果,而智能手机应用程序有潜力弥补这一差距。尽管目前的证据有限,但现有证据表明应用程序可以成为有效的戒烟支持工具;然而,在了解电子烟戒烟应用程序的用户体验方面仍存在差距。

目的

本研究的目的是通过对应用程序评论的分析来探索电子烟戒烟应用程序的用户体验。更具体地说,本研究旨在确定应用程序用户的正面和负面体验,并突出应用程序用户提出的改进这些应用程序质量的建议。

方法

2022年8月,通过在加拿大和美国版的苹果应用商店以及安卓谷歌应用商店中搜索,确定了电子烟戒烟应用程序。搜索结果显示,共有11款带有应用程序评论的电子烟戒烟应用程序,共计310条评论可供分析。使用演绎式内容分析法对评论材料进行分析,并分为以下主要类别:内容、功能、美观性、成本和其他。这些类别进一步细分为3个二级类别(赞扬、批评和建议)以及多个三级类别。

结果

讨论最多的主要类别是内容、功能和成本。关于内容的评论往往是正面的(n=103,33.2%),赞扬了诸如催眠音频课程(n=29,28.2%)和追踪功能等特性。相比之下,评论往往批评功能(n=58,18.7%),指出应用程序功能存在问题,这些问题要么导致整个应用程序无法使用(n=29,50%),要么导致某个特定功能无法使用(n=28,48.3%)。关于成本的评论好坏参半,有27条(8.7%)正面评论,其中大多数评论者对购买感到满意(n=17,63%),有38条(12.3%)负面评论,包括对购买不满意的个人(n=15,39.5%)和对免费版本不满意的个人(n=12,31.6%)。

结论

本研究是同类研究中首个通过分析应用程序评论来评估电子烟戒烟应用程序用户体验的研究。应用程序开发者可能会从阅读我们的研究结果中受益,从而确定在开发和更新应用程序时需要关注的领域。我们的研究为未来电子烟干预措施的开发以及未来的研究奠定了基础。未来的研究应针对电子烟戒烟干预措施展开,重点关注用户体验,因为与本研究的 promising 结果相比,可供比较的研究有限。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Smokers' user experience of smoking cessation apps: A systematic review.烟民使用戒烟应用程序的体验:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Jul;175:105069. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105069. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
4
A large scale analysis of mHealth app user reviews.移动健康应用程序用户评论的大规模分析。
Empir Softw Eng. 2022;27(7):196. doi: 10.1007/s10664-022-10222-6. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验