Agho Awanwosa V, Disu Fatimot, Figueroa Alexander S, Wiredu Bernard, Okorigba Efeturi M, Olanite Michael, Okobi Okelue E, Noman Tazeen
Internal Medicine, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Darby, USA.
General Internal Medicine, Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, Salisbury, GBR.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):e83076. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83076. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Angina pectoris remains a significant public health concern, highlighting disparities in cardiovascular health influenced by demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors. Analyzing the prevalence of trends is crucial to addressing health inequities and informing targeted interventions. The study of National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 2019 to 2023 allowed us to observe how the pandemic affected cardiovascular care utilization when it decreased in 2020 and later rebounded into 2023 while investigating shifts in reported angina prevalence rates among main groups. Angina pectoris condition-related research requires assessment of current trends for effective health inequities intervention and targeted intervention planning.
This study aims to examine the prevalence of angina pectoris among United States (US) adults from 2019 to 2023 and across demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors.
Data from the NHIS were analyzed to determine the prevalence of angina pectoris, which was identified through self-reported diagnosis or symptoms. The identification of angina pectoris in the NHIS dataset was based on self-reported physician diagnosis alongside responses to definite survey questions regarding chest pain and discomfort consistent with the symptoms of angina. Angina pectoris was identified in the NHIS dataset based on self-reported physician diagnoses and responses to specific survey questions on chest pain or discomfort consistent with angina. Stratified analyses assessed variations in prevalence across key demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors over a five-year period. The statistical analyses included both inferential analyses and descriptive statistics, including hypothesis testing and confidence interval estimation, to evaluate associations and divergences within the data. The prevalence of angina was evaluated across socioeconomic, demographic, and geographic groups using stratified analyses.
The overall prevalence of angina pectoris remained stable (1.5-1.7%) from 2019 to 2023. Higher rates were observed among males (1.8%), older adults (4.5% in those aged 75 years and older), and US-born individuals (1.6%). Disparities observed across race/ethnicity further revealed disparities, with American Indian/Alaska Native individuals (2.1%) and Black individuals (1.2%) showing distinct patterns. Geographic trends highlighted a higher prevalence in areas with high social vulnerability (1.7%). Socioeconomic disparities were notable, with lower-income individuals (<100% federal poverty level (FPL)) experiencing higher prevalence (2.8-3.1%) and elevated rates among those with lower educational attainment. Employment status influenced prevalence, with unemployed individuals showing higher rates (3.4%).
The prevalence of angina pectoris reflects persistent disparities across demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors. The findings highlight the need for policies that enhance access to preventive cardiovascular care, early screening, and intervention, as well as address the social determinants of health, to minimize disparities in underserved populations.
心绞痛仍然是一个重大的公共卫生问题,凸显了人口、社会经济和地理因素对心血管健康的影响差异。分析趋势的普遍性对于解决健康不平等问题和制定有针对性的干预措施至关重要。对2019年至2023年国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)数据的研究,使我们能够观察到疫情期间心血管护理利用率在2020年下降,随后在2023年反弹的情况下受到了怎样的影响,同时调查主要群体中心绞痛患病率报告的变化。心绞痛相关研究需要评估当前趋势,以进行有效的健康不平等干预和有针对性的干预规划。
本研究旨在调查2019年至2023年美国成年人中心绞痛的患病率,并分析不同人口、社会经济和地理因素的影响。
对NHIS数据进行分析,以确定心绞痛的患病率,该患病率通过自我报告的诊断或症状来确定。NHIS数据集中心绞痛的识别基于自我报告的医生诊断以及对与心绞痛症状一致的胸痛和不适的特定调查问题的回答。基于自我报告的医生诊断以及对与心绞痛一致的胸痛或不适的特定调查问题的回答,在NHIS数据集中识别心绞痛。分层分析评估了五年期间关键人口、社会经济和地理因素的患病率差异。统计分析包括推断分析和描述性统计,包括假设检验和置信区间估计,以评估数据中的关联和差异。使用分层分析评估了社会经济、人口和地理群体中心绞痛的患病率。
2019年至2023年,心绞痛的总体患病率保持稳定(1.5-1.7%)。男性(1.8%)、老年人(75岁及以上人群中为4.5%)和美国出生的人(1.6%)的患病率较高。种族/民族间的差异进一步显现,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(2.1%)和黑人(1.2%)呈现出不同的模式。地理趋势表明,社会脆弱性高的地区患病率较高(1.7%)。社会经济差异显著,低收入个体(低于100%联邦贫困线(FPL))的患病率较高(2.8-3.1%),受教育程度较低的人群患病率也较高。就业状况影响患病率,失业个体的患病率较高(3.4%)。
心绞痛的患病率反映了人口、社会经济和地理因素方面持续存在的差异。研究结果强调需要制定政策,以增加获得预防性心血管护理、早期筛查和干预的机会,并解决健康的社会决定因素,以尽量减少服务不足人群中的差异。