• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常水平眼前庭反射增益和视动性眼震跟踪扫视:仍是一个诊断难题。

Normal horizontal VOR gain and catch-up saccades: still a diagnostic dilemma.

作者信息

Salvago Pietro, Vaccaro Davide, Plescia Fulvio, Alberti Giuseppe, Bianco Antonino, Cirrincione Luigi, Evola Lucrezia, Martines Francesco

机构信息

Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata (BiND), Sezione di Audiologia, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, Palermo, 90127, Italy.

UOSD Audiologia, A.O.U.P. "Paolo Giaccone", Via del Vespro 129, Palermo, 90127, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09490-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00405-025-09490-x
PMID:40439923
Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze the relationship between normal horizontal vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) gain with catch-up saccades (CS) in patients reporting recurrent or chronic vestibular symptoms of unknown causes.

METHODS

A prospective study involving 34 patients suffering from vestibular symptoms of unknown origin; all subjects presented bilateral normal horizontal VOR gain and CS on at least one side. Data collection regarded onset and duration of vestibular symptoms. vHIT parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients complained of episodic spontaneous vertigo in 54.54% of cases, dizziness in 12.12%, and unsteadiness in 33.33% respectively. The study of VOR gain evidenced a mean gain of 0.92 ± 0.08 for the right and of 0.89 ± 0.07 for the left horizontal semicircular canal (HSC) (p = 0.11). A weak inverse correlation between age and VOR gain (r=-0.007232, p = 0.954) was found. CS were observed bilaterally in 66.66% of subjects, with overt saccades in 78.78% of HSC. All detected CS presented a peak velocity between 100 and 200 °/s with a scattered pattern of saccade distribution in 75.86% of cases. HSC with a VOR gain between 0.8 and 0.89 exhibited the highest prevalence (84.37%) of overt saccades (p = 0.01). No relationship was found between CS laterality, the clusterization of saccades, and different vertigo symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Patients suffering from vertigo of unknown origin with a normal VOR gain and CS displayed a CS pattern that was mainly represented by overt saccades with a scattered pattern that may be an indirect sign of an underlying vestibular dysfunction; clinicians should include a careful analysis of CS patterns and metrics to better explore vestibular function.

摘要

目的

分析原因不明的复发性或慢性前庭症状患者的正常水平前庭眼反射(VOR)增益与视动性眼震(CS)之间的关系。

方法

一项前瞻性研究,纳入34例病因不明的前庭症状患者;所有受试者至少一侧的双侧水平VOR增益和CS均正常。收集前庭症状的发作情况和持续时间,并分析视频头脉冲试验(vHIT)参数。

结果

患者分别有54.54%出现发作性自发性眩晕,12.12%出现头晕,33.33%出现不稳感。VOR增益研究显示,右侧水平半规管(HSC)的平均增益为0.92±0.08,左侧为0.89±0.07(p = 0.11)。发现年龄与VOR增益之间存在弱负相关(r = -0.007232,p = 0.954)。66.66%的受试者双侧观察到CS,78.78%的HSC出现明显眼震。所有检测到的CS的峰值速度在100至200°/秒之间,75.86%的病例中眼震分布呈散在模式。VOR增益在0.8至0.89之间的HSC出现明显眼震的患病率最高(84.37%)(p = 0.01)。未发现CS的侧别、眼震聚集与不同眩晕症状之间存在关联。

结论

VOR增益和CS正常的不明原因眩晕患者表现出的CS模式主要以明显眼震和散在模式为特征,这可能是潜在前庭功能障碍的间接征象;临床医生应仔细分析CS模式和指标,以更好地评估前庭功能。

相似文献

1
Normal horizontal VOR gain and catch-up saccades: still a diagnostic dilemma.正常水平眼前庭反射增益和视动性眼震跟踪扫视:仍是一个诊断难题。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09490-x.
2
Presence of corrective saccades in patients with normal vestibulo-ocular reflex gain in video head impulse test.视频头脉冲试验中前庭眼反射增益正常的患者存在矫正性扫视。
Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 13;14:1152052. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1152052. eCollection 2023.
3
Quantitative Analysis of Saccade Gain in Video Head Impulse Testing.视频头脉冲试验中眼跳增益的定量分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Oct;163(4):799-805. doi: 10.1177/0194599820930669. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
4
[Video head impulse test in peripheral vestibular diseases].[外周前庭疾病的视频头脉冲试验]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Sep;50(9):724-8.
5
Veterans with dizziness recruit compensatory saccades in each semicircular canal plane although VOR gain is normal.尽管前庭眼反射(VOR)增益正常,但患有头晕的退伍军人在每个半规管平面都会出现代偿性扫视。
J Vestib Res. 2020;30(1):47-53. doi: 10.3233/VES-200692.
6
Recovery Pattern of High-Frequency Acceleration Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex in Unilateral Vestibular Neuritis: A Preliminary Study.单侧前庭神经炎高频加速前庭眼反射的恢复模式:一项初步研究
Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 7;10:85. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00085. eCollection 2019.
7
Age adjusted normative data for Video Head Impulse Test in healthy subjects.视频头脉冲试验在健康受试者中的年龄校正正常参考值。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Nov-Dec;42(6):103160. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103160. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
8
[Horizontal semicircular canalvideo head impulse test in normaladults:normal value and age distribution].[正常成年人水平半规管视频头脉冲试验:正常值及年龄分布]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jul 5;30(13):1063-1065. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2016.13.014.
9
Head impulse test in unilateral vestibular loss: vestibulo-ocular reflex and catch-up saccades.单侧前庭功能丧失时的摇头试验:前庭眼反射和视动性眼震
Neurology. 2008 Feb 5;70(6):454-63. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000299117.48935.2e.
10
Vertical saccades during horizontal head impulses: a sign of posterior semicircular canal hypofunction.水平头部脉冲时的垂直扫视:后半规管功能低下的标志。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2024 Jun;44(3):198-203. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2508. Epub 2024 May 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Episodic Vertigo: A Narrative Review Based on a Single-Center Clinical Experience.发作性眩晕:基于单中心临床经验的叙述性综述
Audiol Res. 2023 Nov 1;13(6):845-858. doi: 10.3390/audiolres13060074.
2
Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and asymmetric hearing loss: is the worst hearing ear likely to suffer from otoconial displacement?良性阵发性位置性眩晕和不对称性听力损失:听力最差的耳朵是否更容易发生耳石移位?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jan;281(1):163-170. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08119-1. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
3
Similarities and Differences between Vestibular Migraine and Recurrent Vestibular Symptoms-Not Otherwise Specified (RVS-NOS).
前庭性偏头痛与未另作特殊说明的复发性前庭症状(RVS-NOS)之间的异同
Audiol Res. 2023 Jun 8;13(3):466-472. doi: 10.3390/audiolres13030041.
4
Saccades of video head impulse test in Meniere's disease and Vestibular Migraine: What can we learn from?梅尼埃病和前庭性偏头痛患者视频头脉冲试验的扫视:我们能从中了解到什么?
J Otol. 2023 Apr;18(2):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Jan 8.
5
Discrepancies of video head impulse test results in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss with vertigo and vestibular neuritis.特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失伴眩晕患者与前庭神经炎患者视频头脉冲试验结果的差异
Front Neurosci. 2023 Apr 17;17:1102512. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1102512. eCollection 2023.
6
Presence of corrective saccades in patients with normal vestibulo-ocular reflex gain in video head impulse test.视频头脉冲试验中前庭眼反射增益正常的患者存在矫正性扫视。
Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 13;14:1152052. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1152052. eCollection 2023.
7
Audiological assessment with Matrix sentence test of percutaneous vs transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids: a pilot study.经皮与经皮骨锚式助听骨导听力评估:一项初步研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Sep;280(9):4065-4072. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07918-w. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
8
VOR gain of lateral semicircular canal using video head impulse test in acute unilateral vestibular hypofunction: A systematic review.急性单侧前庭功能减退患者视频头脉冲试验中水平半规管的VOR增益:一项系统评价
Front Neurol. 2022 Dec 8;13:948462. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.948462. eCollection 2022.
9
Recurrent Vestibulopathy: Comparison of Vestibular Test Results with Ménière's Disease and Vestibular Migraine.复发性前庭病:前庭测试结果与梅尼埃病和前庭性偏头痛的比较
Audiol Neurootol. 2023;28(2):116-127. doi: 10.1159/000526814. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
10
Video head impulse testing: Pitfalls in neurological patients.视频头脉冲试验:神经科患者的陷阱。
J Neurol Sci. 2022 Nov 15;442:120417. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120417. Epub 2022 Sep 17.