Khatri Resham B, Khanal Pratik, Thakuri Dipendra Singh, Ghimire Prabesh, Jakovljevic Mihajlo
Health Social Science and Development Research Institute, Kathmandu, Nepal.
School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
PLoS One. 2025 May 29;20(5):e0324880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324880. eCollection 2025.
Nepal has been undergoing demographic and epidemiological transitions, marked by an increasing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and injuries. These transitions have led to financial implications, including rising out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses. This study reviews and synthesizes evidence on the status, issues and challenges in health financing system, policies, and programs to achieve universal health coverage (UHC) in Nepal.
We conducted a scoping review of literature on Nepal's health financing system, policies, and programs. A search strategy was developed using keywords related to two core concepts: health financing and universal health coverage. Grey literature was identified from the web pages of relevant ministries and organizations. A total of 148 studies/policy documents published in Nepali and English up to 31 December 2024 were included. Policies and content related to the health financing system were reviewed to understand the status, issues and challenges of health financing functions, and UHC . A framework-guided deductive content analysis approach was employed, and findings were interpreted using the three UHC components: service coverage, population coverage, and financial coverage.
Nepal's health policy documents prioritize financial protection for low-income people and target groups through social health protection programs/schemes. However, multiple social health protection schemes coexist with fragmented risk pooling and low efficiency in health financing. OOP expenditure is high at 54.2%, with 10% of the population facing catastrophic health expenditures. Injuries and chronic morbidities contribute significantly to this burden, with 70% of injury-related and 62% of NCD-related expenses borne through OOP payments. Despite efforts to improve financial risk protection, the National Health Insurance Program (NHIP) suffers from low population coverage (28%), low renewal rate (54%), and financial sustainability issues (as provider payments exceed revenue collection). The UHC service coverage index, though improving, was only 54 out of 100 in 2021 reflecting limited health system capacity and insufficient readiness to address health challenges, including those posed by shifting demographics and the growing burden of NCDs. Nepal's total health expenditure remains around 2% of GDP, with persistent inefficiencies in resource allocation, fiscal decentralization, and budget absorption.
Nepal's health financing policies align with UHC goals, yet critical gaps remain in multiple dimensions . Issues such as inefficiencies, underfunding, and fragmented social health protection schemes limit equitable access to quality health care. Therefore, comprehensive structural reforms-spanning legal, institutional, and policy frameworks-are urgently needed. Key reforms include: (1) merging or harmonizing existing social health protection schemes for efficient pooling and purchasing; (2) enhancing domestic health financing through increased health funding (≥5% of GDP) via payroll contributions, progressive taxation, and earmarked sin taxes; (3) reforming NHIP to mandatory enrollment starting from formal sector, subsidizing premium for informal sector and free coverage for disadvantaged groups, alongside strengthening policy implementation including accrediting of health facilities, ensuring service quality, prioritising and expanding coverage packages with strategic purchasing from all public and private health facilities; and (4) equitable public financing to ensure needs-based allocation across government levels that respond to demographic and epidemiological patterns. Further research is needed to assess hybrid tax and premium based insurance models, strategic purchasing optimization, and digital health innovations for financial sustainability.
尼泊尔正经历人口结构和流行病学转变,其特征是非传染性疾病(NCDs)和伤害负担不断增加。这些转变带来了经济影响,包括自付费用的上升。本研究回顾并综合了有关尼泊尔卫生筹资系统、政策和计划在实现全民健康覆盖(UHC)方面的现状、问题和挑战的证据。
我们对尼泊尔卫生筹资系统、政策和计划的文献进行了范围界定审查。使用与两个核心概念相关的关键词制定了搜索策略:卫生筹资和全民健康覆盖。从相关部委和组织网页中识别灰色文献。纳入了截至2024年12月31日以尼泊尔语和英语发表的148项研究/政策文件。审查了与卫生筹资系统相关的政策和内容,以了解卫生筹资功能以及全民健康覆盖的现状、问题和挑战。采用了框架指导的演绎性内容分析法,并使用全民健康覆盖的三个组成部分(服务覆盖、人口覆盖和财务覆盖)来解释研究结果。
尼泊尔的卫生政策文件通过社会健康保护计划/方案将低收入人群和目标群体的财务保护作为优先事项。然而,多个社会健康保护计划并存,风险分担分散,卫生筹资效率低下。自付费用高达54.2%,10%的人口面临灾难性医疗支出。伤害和慢性病在这一负担中占很大比例,70%的伤害相关费用和62%的非传染性疾病相关费用通过自付支付。尽管努力改善财务风险保护,但国家健康保险计划(NHIP)的人口覆盖率较低(28%),续保率较低(54%),并且存在财务可持续性问题(因为向提供者的支付超过了收入征收)。全民健康覆盖服务覆盖指数虽然在提高,但2021年在100分中仅为54分,反映出卫生系统能力有限,应对卫生挑战(包括人口结构变化和非传染性疾病负担增加带来的挑战)的准备不足。尼泊尔的卫生总支出仍占国内生产总值的2%左右,在资源分配、财政分权和预算吸收方面持续存在效率低下问题。
尼泊尔的卫生筹资政策与全民健康覆盖目标一致,但在多个方面仍存在关键差距。效率低下、资金不足和社会健康保护计划分散等问题限制了公平获得优质医疗服务的机会。因此,迫切需要全面的结构性改革,涵盖法律、制度和政策框架。关键改革包括:(1)合并或协调现有的社会健康保护计划,以实现高效的风险分担和采购;(2)通过工资税、累进税和专项罪恶税增加卫生资金(≥国内生产总值的5%)来加强国内卫生筹资;(3)改革国家健康保险计划,从正规部门开始强制参保,补贴非正规部门的保费,为弱势群体提供免费覆盖,同时加强政策实施,包括对卫生设施进行认证、确保服务质量、通过从所有公共和私立卫生设施进行战略采购来优先考虑和扩大覆盖范围;(4)公平的公共筹资,以确保根据需求在各级政府之间进行分配,以应对人口结构和流行病学模式。需要进一步研究来评估基于税收和保费的混合保险模式、战略采购优化以及数字健康创新对财务可持续性的影响。