Pitkänen Joonas, Sariaslan Amir, Bishop Lauren, Martikainen Pekka
Faculty of Social Sciences, Helsinki Institute for Demography and Population Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Max Planck-University of Helsinki Research Center for Social Inequalities in Population Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Int J Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 12;54(3). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaf074.
Childhood household dysfunction is a well-known risk factor for adverse medical and social outcomes. However, less is known about the extent to which such associations are affected by unmeasured familial confounding.
This cohort study is based on Finnish register data on birth cohorts 1987-2000 (n = 835 987). We considered parental hospital-presenting substance use and psychiatric disorders, prison sentences, death, means-tested social assistance, and union dissolution at ages 0-14 as indicators of childhood household dysfunction. The study participants were followed from age 15 until the end of 2020 for hospital-presenting psychiatric disorders and substance use, psychotropic medication purchases, violent and property crime arrests, and not being in education, employment, or training. The associations were estimated using Cox regression, and cousin comparisons were used to account for unmeasured confounders shared within extended families (n = 87 500).
All the exposures were associated with the outcomes in the population-level models, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.3 (95% confidence interval 1.3-1.4) to 2.5 (2.4-2.6). The associations attenuated in the cousin comparisons, on average 12% but with a wide range from -2% to 39% [hazard ratios ranging from 1.2 (1.1-1.4) to 1.9 (1.6-2.3)]. A dose-response relationship between the exposures and the outcomes was observed in the population-level models and the cousin comparisons, with attenuated associations in the latter.
Our findings show systematic associations between childhood household dysfunction and subsequent outcomes. Unobserved confounding likely creates upward bias in these associations, but the extent of this confounding depends on the specific exposure-outcome pairs.
儿童期家庭功能失调是导致不良医学和社会后果的一个众所周知的风险因素。然而,对于此类关联在多大程度上受到未测量的家庭混杂因素影响,人们了解较少。
这项队列研究基于芬兰1987 - 2000年出生队列的登记数据(n = 835987)。我们将父母在孩子0 - 14岁时因物质使用和精神疾病住院、入狱、死亡、经过经济状况调查的社会救助以及婚姻关系解除视为儿童期家庭功能失调的指标。研究参与者从15岁开始随访至2020年底,记录因精神疾病和物质使用住院、购买精神药物、暴力和财产犯罪被捕情况,以及未接受教育、就业或培训的情况。使用Cox回归估计关联,并通过堂兄弟姐妹比较来考虑大家庭中共享的未测量混杂因素(n = 87500)。
在总体水平模型中,所有暴露因素均与结局相关,风险比范围为1.3(95%置信区间1.3 - 1.4)至2.5(2.4 - 2.6)。在堂兄弟姐妹比较中,关联有所减弱,平均减弱12%,但范围较广,从 - 2%至39%[风险比范围为1.2(1.1 - 1.4)至1.9(1.6 - 2.3)]。在总体水平模型和堂兄弟姐妹比较中均观察到暴露因素与结局之间的剂量反应关系,后者的关联有所减弱。
我们的研究结果表明儿童期家庭功能失调与后续结局之间存在系统性关联。未观察到的混杂因素可能会使这些关联产生向上的偏差,但这种混杂的程度取决于具体的暴露 - 结局对。