Suppr超能文献

一项口服益生菌干预措施的开放标签随机对照试验及可行性研究,旨在在分娩时降低孕妇B族链球菌定植率。

Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial and Feasibility Study of an Oral Probiotic Intervention to Reduce Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant People by the Time of Birth.

作者信息

Nardini Katrina, Hanson Lisa, Borders Noelle, Singh Maharaj, Shields Anna, Trujillo Victoria Y, Lawton Robyn, Malloy Emily

机构信息

Midwifery Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

College of Nursing, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2025 May-Jun;70(3):460-467. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13765. Epub 2025 May 29.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this midwife-led study was to determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of probiotics to reduce group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization by the time of birth in healthy, GBS-positive, pregnant adults.

METHODS

An open-label randomized clinical trial comparing Florajen Digestion, a commercially available combination oral probiotic, with usual care (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04721912) was conducted in a midwifery practice serving a racially and ethnically diverse population. Eligible patients who tested positive for GBS at routine third-trimester screening were offered informed consent and participation. The primary outcome was feasibility for a larger RCT, including feasibility of probiotic use among participants. Secondary outcomes were intrapartum GBS colonization and Antepartum Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Pregnancy (AP-GI-SA) scores.

RESULTS

A total of 68 participants were enrolled and randomized; 65 participants completed the study, but only 46 had intrapartum cultures collected and processed. Among the 23 pregnant individuals who were eligible but chose not to participate, 3 indicated that they did not want to take a probiotic. After an average of 14 days of the intervention, 7 of 25 (28%) participants in the probiotic group had a negative intrapartum GBS result compared with 3 of 21 (14.3%) in the control group (odds ratio, 2.33; 95% CI, 0.52-10.48). There was no difference in perinatal outcomes or AP-GI-SA scores between groups. No adverse events occurred.

DISCUSSION

The feasibility of a larger RCT was demonstrated. Challenges identified included intrapartum GBS collection and laboratory processing during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was not powered to detect a significant difference in intrapartum GBS colonization, although a larger decrease in GBS colonization was noted among probiotic-using participants. Florajen Digestion may show efficacy in a RCT with a longer intervention period. It is possible that the probiotic intervention duration was too brief to show a reduction in gastrointestinal pregnancy symptoms.

摘要

引言

这项由助产士主导的研究旨在确定一项随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性,该试验旨在研究益生菌能否降低健康的、B族链球菌(GBS)阳性的成年孕妇在分娩时的GBS定植率。

方法

在一个服务于种族和民族多样化人群的助产机构中,开展了一项开放标签的随机临床试验,将市售的组合型口服益生菌Florajen Digestion与常规护理进行比较(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04721912)。在孕晚期常规筛查中GBS检测呈阳性的符合条件的患者被邀请签署知情同意书并参与研究。主要结局是进行更大规模RCT的可行性,包括参与者使用益生菌的可行性。次要结局是产时GBS定植情况和产前妊娠胃肠道症状(AP-GI-SA)评分。

结果

总共招募了68名参与者并进行随机分组;65名参与者完成了研究,但只有46名进行了产时培养物的采集和处理。在23名符合条件但选择不参与的孕妇中,有3人表示她们不想服用益生菌。在平均干预14天后,益生菌组25名参与者中有7人(28%)产时GBS检测结果为阴性,而对照组21名参与者中有3人(14.3%)为阴性(比值比,2.33;95%置信区间,0.52 - 10.48)。两组之间的围产期结局或AP-GI-SA评分没有差异。未发生不良事件。

讨论

证明了进行更大规模RCT的可行性。发现的挑战包括在新冠疫情期间进行产时GBS采集和实验室处理。该研究的样本量不足以检测出产时GBS定植的显著差异,尽管在使用益生菌的参与者中GBS定植的降低幅度更大。Florajen Digestion在干预期更长的RCT中可能显示出疗效。益生菌的干预持续时间可能过短,以至于未能显示出胃肠道妊娠症状的减轻。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验