Wick Ryan R, Judd Louise M, Stinear Timothy P, Monk Ian R
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Centre for Pathogen Genomics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Access Microbiol. 2025 May 28;7(5). doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.001025.v3. eCollection 2025.
Accurate nucleotide variant calling is essential in microbial genomics, particularly for outbreak tracking and phylogenetics. This study evaluates variant calls derived from genome assemblies compared to traditional read-based variant-calling methods, using seven closely related isolates sequenced on Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies platforms. By benchmarking multiple assembly and variant-calling pipelines against a ground truth dataset, we found that read-based methods consistently achieved high accuracy. Assembly-based approaches performed well in some cases but were highly dependent on assembly quality, as errors in the assembly led to false-positive variant calls. These findings underscore the need for improved assembly techniques before the potential benefits of assembly-based variant calling (such as reduced computational requirements and simpler data management) can be realized.
准确的核苷酸变异检测在微生物基因组学中至关重要,特别是对于疫情追踪和系统发育分析。本研究使用在Illumina和Oxford Nanopore Technologies平台上测序的七个密切相关的分离株,评估了与传统的基于 reads 的变异检测方法相比,从基因组组装中获得的变异检测结果。通过将多个组装和变异检测流程与一个真实数据集进行基准测试,我们发现基于 reads 的方法始终具有很高的准确性。基于组装的方法在某些情况下表现良好,但高度依赖于组装质量,因为组装中的错误会导致假阳性变异检测。这些发现强调,在实现基于组装的变异检测的潜在好处(如降低计算需求和简化数据管理)之前,需要改进组装技术。