Gormsen Lise Kirstine
Department of Functional Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
J Pain Res. 2025 May 24;18:2651-2662. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S508125. eCollection 2025.
Ambiguous results on pain thresholds often occur from biomedical pain research. Although results and methods are frequently discussed, only few studies have investigated participants' understanding and perspectives of pain in research settings. The aim of this qualitative pilot study was to explore different understandings of pain in a clinical pain research setting.
We briefly interviewed 25 subjects, including Danish pain doctors and psychiatrists as well as pain patients, depressed patients, and healthy controls (five in each group) about their understanding of pain.
Laymen seem less inclined to verbalize pain than professionals. In addition, they may embrace a concept of suffering that goes beyond the traditional body-mind dichotomy. Since suffering may be part of the pain experience, this difference in the understanding of pain may be at the core of the often ambiguous results when doctors and other health professionals study pain.
The results emphasize the need for supporting the ongoing process of integrating broad perspectives on pain in clinical pain research, including the concept of suffering. More research and resources are needed in this particular area of pain medicine.
生物医学疼痛研究中,疼痛阈值的结果往往不明确。尽管研究结果和方法经常被讨论,但只有少数研究调查了参与者在研究环境中对疼痛的理解和看法。这项定性试点研究的目的是探索临床疼痛研究环境中对疼痛的不同理解。
我们简要采访了25名受试者,包括丹麦疼痛科医生、精神科医生以及疼痛患者、抑郁症患者和健康对照者(每组各5名),询问他们对疼痛的理解。
外行人似乎比专业人员更不愿意表达疼痛。此外,他们可能接受一种超越传统身心二分法的痛苦概念。由于痛苦可能是疼痛体验的一部分,医生和其他健康专业人员研究疼痛时,这种对疼痛理解的差异可能是结果常常不明确的核心原因。
研究结果强调,在临床疼痛研究中,需要支持将对疼痛的广泛观点(包括痛苦概念)纳入其中的持续进程。在疼痛医学的这一特定领域,需要更多的研究和资源。