• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外循环下多支冠状动脉血运重建术中左前小切口开胸术与传统胸骨切开术的比较

Left Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy vs. Conventional Sternotomy in On-Pump Multivessel Coronary Revascularization.

作者信息

Sicim Hüseyin, Fedakar Ali

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kırklareli Training and Research Hospital, Kırklareli, Turkey.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hisar Intercontinental Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 May 30;40(3):e20230299. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0299.

DOI:10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0299
PMID:40445077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12131425/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to compare the outcomes of left anterior mini-thoracotomy and conventional sternotomy in on-pump multivessel coronary revascularization.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-two patients who underwent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting through the left anterior mini-thoracotomy and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting with full sternotomy were included. All patients were divided into two groups - 132 patients who underwent minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting in Group I, and 130 patients with full sternotomy in Group II. Intraoperative variables (cross-clamping time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, etc.), postoperative parameters (drainage amount, revision, intensive care and hospital stay times, etc.), and mortality were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Cardiopulmonary bypass time (152.24 ± 36.4 minutes) was significantly longer in Group I than in Group II (102.24 ± 19.4 minutes) (P<0.001). Cross-clamping time (86 ± 13.2 minutes) was significantly longer in Group I than in Group II (62 ± 21.4 minutes) (P<0.001). And intensive care stay time (P=0.005) and hospital stay time (P=0.004) were significantly shorter in Group I. In the postoperative period, six patients in Group I and seven patients in Group II were revised due to bleeding. Total perioperative mortality was one patient in both groups (P=0.82).

CONCLUSION

Multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting through the left anterior mini-thoracotomy is an effective, reliable, and successful method, due to less drainage amount and less blood transfusion need, shorter intensive care and hospital stays, faster return to daily life, and better cosmetic results compared to conventional methods.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,我们旨在比较在体外循环下进行多支冠状动脉血运重建时左前小切口开胸术与传统胸骨切开术的效果。

方法

纳入262例通过左前小切口开胸术进行微创冠状动脉旁路移植术以及通过传统胸骨正中切开术进行冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者。所有患者分为两组——I组132例行微创多支冠状动脉旁路移植术,II组130例行胸骨正中切开术。回顾性分析术中变量(阻断时间、体外循环时间等)、术后参数(引流量、再次手术、重症监护和住院时间等)以及死亡率。

结果

I组的体外循环时间(152.24±36.4分钟)显著长于II组(102.24±19.4分钟)(P<0.001)。I组的阻断时间(86±13.2分钟)显著长于II组(62±21.4分钟)(P<0.001)。I组的重症监护停留时间(P=0.005)和住院时间(P=0.004)显著更短。术后,I组有6例患者和II组有7例患者因出血进行了再次手术。两组围手术期总死亡率均为1例患者(P=0.82)。

结论

与传统方法相比,通过左前小切口开胸术进行多支冠状动脉旁路移植术是一种有效、可靠且成功的方法,因为其引流量更少、输血需求更少、重症监护和住院时间更短、恢复日常生活更快且美容效果更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/574b/12131425/c390b81c9512/bjcvs-40-03-e20230299-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/574b/12131425/2a0732fb906c/bjcvs-40-03-e20230299-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/574b/12131425/ffb8970a5a9d/bjcvs-40-03-e20230299-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/574b/12131425/c390b81c9512/bjcvs-40-03-e20230299-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/574b/12131425/2a0732fb906c/bjcvs-40-03-e20230299-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/574b/12131425/ffb8970a5a9d/bjcvs-40-03-e20230299-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/574b/12131425/c390b81c9512/bjcvs-40-03-e20230299-g03.jpg

相似文献

1
Left Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy vs. Conventional Sternotomy in On-Pump Multivessel Coronary Revascularization.体外循环下多支冠状动脉血运重建术中左前小切口开胸术与传统胸骨切开术的比较
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 May 30;40(3):e20230299. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0299.
2
Routine minimally invasive approach via left anterior mini-thoracotomy in multivessel coronary revascularization.常规微创左胸前小切口多支冠状动脉血运重建术。
J Card Surg. 2022 Apr;37(4):769-776. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16259. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
3
Mid-Term Follow-up of Minimally Invasive Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Is the Early Learning Phase Detrimental?微创多支冠状动脉旁路移植术的中期随访:早期学习阶段是否有害?
Innovations (Phila). 2017 Mar/Apr;12(2):116-120. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000353.
4
Evolution of Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Learning Curve.微创冠状动脉旁路移植术的发展:学习曲线
Innovations (Phila). 2018 Mar/Apr;13(2):81-90. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000483.
5
Complete Coronary Revascularization via Left Anterior Thoracotomy.经左前开胸术完成冠状动脉血运重建
Innovations (Phila). 2019 Aug;14(4):330-341. doi: 10.1177/1556984519849126. Epub 2019 May 20.
6
Novel concept of less invasive concomitant surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting avoiding full median sternotomy.避免完全正中胸骨切开术的微创同期主动脉瓣置换术和冠状动脉旁路移植术的新概念。
Heart Vessels. 2023 Oct;38(10):1298-1303. doi: 10.1007/s00380-023-02281-6. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
7
An open randomized controlled trial of median sternotomy versus anterolateral left thoracotomy on morbidity and health care resource use in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: the Sternotomy Versus Thoracotomy (STET) trial.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者正中开胸与前外侧左开胸对发病率和医疗资源利用影响的开放性随机对照试验:正中开胸与左开胸(STET)试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;146(2):306-16.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.04.020. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
8
Multivessel Arterial Revascularization via Left Anterior Thoracotomy.经左前外侧开胸进行多支动脉血运重建。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;32(4):655-662. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.02.032. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
9
Improved operative and recovery times with mini-thoracotomy aortic valve replacement.小切口开胸主动脉瓣置换术可缩短手术及恢复时间。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 May 9;14(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-0912-0.
10
Predictors and Outcomes of Sternotomy Conversion and Cardiopulmonary Bypass Assistance in Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.微创冠状动脉旁路移植术中胸骨切开术转换和体外循环辅助的预测因素及结果
Innovations (Phila). 2016 Sep/Oct;11(5):315-320. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000309.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of incomplete revascularization on survival in minimal invasive off-pump coronary artery surgery: a propensity score analysis of 1,149 cases.微创非体外循环冠状动脉手术中不完全血运重建对生存的影响:1149例病例的倾向评分分析
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):4504-4514. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-387. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
2
Evaluation of anastomosis quality with intraoperative transit time flowmeter in minimally invasive multi-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting via left anterior mini-thoracotomy.经左前小切口微创多支冠状动脉旁路移植术中应用术中血流时间测定仪评估吻合口质量
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2023 Jan 30;31(1):56-62. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2023.23744. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
Routine minimally invasive approach via left anterior mini-thoracotomy in multivessel coronary revascularization.
常规微创左胸前小切口多支冠状动脉血运重建术。
J Card Surg. 2022 Apr;37(4):769-776. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16259. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
4
Traversing the Learning Curve Associated with a New Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement Service.穿越新微创主动脉瓣置换服务相关的学习曲线。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Oct 17;36(5):648-655. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0436.
5
Comparison of postoperative outcomes between robotic mitral valve replacement and conventional mitral valve replacement.机器人二尖瓣置换术与传统二尖瓣置换术后结果的比较。
J Card Surg. 2021 Apr;36(4):1411-1418. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15418. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
6
Redo robotic cardiac surgery and concomitant cesarean section in a pregnant patient with dextrocardia and situs inversus totalis.为一名患右位心及全内脏反位的孕妇进行再次机器人心脏手术及同期剖宫产术。
J Card Surg. 2019 Sep;34(9):863-866. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14128. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
7
Can minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting be initiated and practiced safely?: a learning curve analysis.微创冠状动脉旁路移植术能否安全开展与实施?:一项学习曲线分析
Innovations (Phila). 2013 Nov-Dec;8(6):403-9. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000019.
8
Results of the Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Angiographic Patency Study.微创冠状动脉旁路移植术血管造影通畅性研究结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):203-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
9
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: dual-center experience in 450 consecutive patients.微创冠状动脉旁路移植术:450例连续患者的双中心经验。
Circulation. 2009 Sep 15;120(11 Suppl):S78-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.840041.
10
Quality assessment in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.微创冠状动脉旁路移植术的质量评估
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Nov;16 Suppl 2:S67-72.