Galante Nicola, Capitanio Daniele, Moriggi Manuela, Mangiavini Laura, D'Ambrosi Riccardo, Battistini Alessio, Zoja Riccardo
Section of Legal Medicine of Milan, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, University of Milan, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 37, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Int J Legal Med. 2025 May 30. doi: 10.1007/s00414-025-03519-w.
The research upon vital reactions is a hot topic in forensic pathology. However, there are very few studies which focus on the bone tissue and scientific data are currently limited to conventional histopathology. The skin and the muscle are also faster than the bone in the healing process. Therefore, the possibility to establish the timing of skeletal traumatic injury is difficult especially for short survival times (peri-mortem interval). For these reasons, bone marrow may represent a dynamic and potentially useful substrate for the identification of bone lesion vitality. Furthermore, novel omics techniques such as the untargeted proteomics could really improve the investigation of reliable forensic markers. This study provides the application of proteomics on human bone marrow of traumatized ribs with the purpose to a) define a significant pattern of vital reaction on broken ribs versus undamaged ones; b) evaluate the proteomic changes over different known survival times; c) assess proteomic differences among resuscitation fractures versus other types of rib traumas (e.g., vehicle and train crashes, falling from heights). The trauma group significantly (q < 0,001) overexpresses acute-phase inflammatory proteins, different extracellular matrix proteins, and bone-related specific proteins. Noteworthy, some of these proteins show very interesting patterns such as complement C9 which provides the best significant results over time, fibrinogen which statistically increases starting from 4 h after trauma, and carbonic anhydrase 2 which is linearly overexpressed in the first 12 h. There are no statistical differences between resuscitation fractures versus other types of rib blunt injuries.
对生命反应的研究是法医病理学中的一个热门话题。然而,很少有研究关注骨组织,目前科学数据仅限于传统组织病理学。在愈合过程中,皮肤和肌肉也比骨骼愈合得更快。因此,确定骨骼创伤损伤时间的可能性很小,尤其是对于短生存时间(濒死期)而言。基于这些原因,骨髓可能是识别骨损伤活力的一个动态且潜在有用的基质。此外,诸如非靶向蛋白质组学等新型组学技术真的可以改善对可靠法医标志物的研究。本研究将蛋白质组学应用于创伤肋骨的人骨髓,目的是:a)确定骨折肋骨与未受损肋骨上生命反应的显著模式;b)评估不同已知生存时间内的蛋白质组变化;c)评估复苏骨折与其他类型肋骨创伤(如车辆和火车碰撞、高处坠落)之间的蛋白质组差异。创伤组显著(q < 0.001)过表达急性期炎症蛋白、不同的细胞外基质蛋白和骨相关特异性蛋白。值得注意的是,其中一些蛋白质呈现出非常有趣的模式,如补体C9随时间推移提供了最佳显著结果,纤维蛋白原从创伤后4小时开始在统计学上增加,碳酸酐酶2在最初12小时内呈线性过表达。复苏骨折与其他类型肋骨钝性损伤之间没有统计学差异。