• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Adaptation of the Korean Version of the Personal Financial Wellness Scale.《个人财务健康量表》韩文版的改编
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2025 May 30;38(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41155-025-00355-0.
2
Comparison of two validated instruments to measure financial hardship in cancer survivors: comprehensive score for financial toxicity (COST) versus personal financial wellness (PFW) scale.两种用于测量癌症幸存者经济困难程度的有效工具的比较:财务毒性综合评分(COST)与个人财务健康(PFW)量表。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec 14;31(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07455-y.
3
Validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness of the Indonesian version of FACIT-COST measure for subjective financial toxicity.《中文版 FACIT-COST 量表评估主观财务毒性的效标关联度、重测信度和反应度》
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 Oct 19;22(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02303-5.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the Diabetes Self-efficacy Scale among South Korean older adults with type 2 diabetes.韩国2型糖尿病老年患者中糖尿病自我效能量表韩文版的心理测量学评估
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Aug;23(15-16):2121-30. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12133. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
5
Adaptation and validation of a Korean version of the speaking up about patient safety questionnaire (KSUPS-Q).韩国版患者安全发声问卷(KSUPS-Q)的改编与验证。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Apr 29;23(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01891-3.
6
Korean Version of the 17-Item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for University Students: A Validity and Reliability Study.大学生17项乌得勒支工作投入量表韩语版:效度与信度研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 29;10(4):642. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040642.
7
Validity and reliability of the Greek Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ Version 2.1-GR).希腊偏头痛特异性生活质量问卷(MSQ 版本 2.1-GR)的有效性和可靠性。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jul 15;8(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00762-4.
8
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Orthorexia Nervosa Inventory.《神经性正食症量表中文版的跨文化适应及心理测量特性》
Front Nutr. 2025 Jan 23;11:1491544. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1491544. eCollection 2024.
10
Psychometric properties of the educational leadership scale for nursing students.护理专业学生教育领导力量表的心理测量学特性
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 6;25(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07269-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamic fit index cutoffs for categorical factor analysis with Likert-type, ordinal, or binary responses.Likert 型、有序或二分类反应的类别因子分析的动态拟合指数截断值。
Am Psychol. 2023 Dec;78(9):1061-1075. doi: 10.1037/amp0001213.
2
[Advantages of using McDonald's omega coefficient over Cronbach's alpha].[使用麦当劳欧米伽系数优于克朗巴赫阿尔法系数的优势]
Nutr Hosp. 2024 Feb 15;41(1):262-263. doi: 10.20960/nh.04879.
3
The role of financial conditions for physical and mental health. Evidence from a longitudinal survey and insurance claims data.财务状况对身心健康的作用。来自纵向调查和保险理赔数据的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jul;281:114041. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114041. Epub 2021 May 21.
4
RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods.结构方程模型中有序分类数据的 RMSEA、CFI 和 TLI:他们讲述的故事取决于估计方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):409-428. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2.
5
Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here.谢谢克朗巴哈系数,接下来我们自己来。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):412-433. doi: 10.1037/met0000144. Epub 2017 May 29.
6
The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables.带有稳健修正的 ML、DWLS 和 ULS 估计在有序变量结构方程模型中的表现。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Sep;21(3):369-87. doi: 10.1037/met0000093.
7
When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.类别变量在何时可以视为连续变量?在次优条件下稳健连续和类别 SEM 估计方法的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):354-73. doi: 10.1037/a0029315. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
8
Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress.用于监测非特异性心理困扰的人群患病率及趋势的简短筛查量表。
Psychol Med. 2002 Aug;32(6):959-76. doi: 10.1017/s0033291702006074.
9
Energy as a central factor in the self-assessment of health.能量作为健康自我评估中的核心因素。
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1993 Jun;15(4):1-12. doi: 10.1097/00012272-199306000-00002.

《个人财务健康量表》韩文版的改编

Adaptation of the Korean Version of the Personal Financial Wellness Scale.

作者信息

Kim Yongseok, Cho Sunghwan, Lee Sokho, Ahn Joseph

机构信息

Department of Social Welfare, The Catholic University of Korea, 43 Jibong-Ro, Bucheon, Gyeonggi-Do, 14662, South Korea.

Graduate School of Social Welfare, The Catholic University of Korea, 43 Jibong-Ro, Bucheon, Gyeonggi-Do, 14662, South Korea.

出版信息

Psicol Reflex Crit. 2025 May 30;38(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41155-025-00355-0.

DOI:10.1186/s41155-025-00355-0
PMID:40445447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12125404/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In South Korea, there are many situations that can threaten financial well-being, a factor that has been known to affect both mental and physical health. However, there has so far not been an instrument to measure an individual's subjective financial well-being.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to adapt the Korean version of the Personal Financial Wellness (PFW) scale.

METHODS

The Korean version of the PFW scale was evaluated with 2,044 adults who participated in an online survey in South Korea. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the factor structure of the PFW scale. Its validity was assessed by examining factor loadings, average variances extracted (AVE), and conceptual reliability (CR). In addition, the relationships between the PFW scale and the scales measuring theoretically relevant constructs were analyzed. Reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, the corrected item-to-total correlation, the inter-item correlation, and McDonald's omega.

RESULTS

The evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the PFW scale indicates that it exhibits a single-factor structure, consistent with the English version. Factor loadings, AVE, and CR all exceeded the recommended thresholds. The model also demonstrated consistent fit indices regardless of the subsample. Invariance of both configural and factor loadings was established across gender, while invariance of configural, factor loadings, and intercepts was confirmed across regions. Additionally, the PFW scale, a subjective measure of financial well-being, is more strongly related to health-related variables than monthly income, which is an objective indicator of financial well-being. Internal consistency reliability for the Korean version of the PFW scale was found to be satisfactory.

CONCLUSIONS

The adaptation of the Korean version of the PFW scale provides a valuable instrument for researchers and practitioners in South Korea, where an instrument measuring an individual's subjective financial well-being does not exist.

摘要

背景

在韩国,有许多情况会威胁到财务状况,而财务状况是已知会影响身心健康的一个因素。然而,到目前为止,还没有一种工具来衡量个人的主观财务状况。

目的

本研究旨在改编韩国版的个人财务健康(PFW)量表。

方法

对2044名参与韩国在线调查的成年人进行了韩国版PFW量表的评估。进行验证性因素分析以检验PFW量表的因素结构。通过检验因素载荷、提取的平均方差(AVE)和概念可靠性(CR)来评估其有效性。此外,还分析了PFW量表与测量理论相关构念的量表之间的关系。使用克朗巴哈α系数、校正后的项目与总分相关性、项目间相关性和麦克唐纳ω系数来检验信度。

结果

对韩国版PFW量表的心理测量特性评估表明,它呈现出单因素结构,与英文版一致。因素载荷、AVE和CR均超过了推荐阈值。无论子样本如何,该模型也都显示出一致的拟合指数。在性别间建立了构型和因素载荷的不变性,而在地区间确认了构型、因素载荷和截距的不变性。此外,作为财务状况主观衡量指标的PFW量表,与健康相关变量的相关性比作为财务状况客观指标的月收入更强。发现韩国版PFW量表的内部一致性信度令人满意。

结论

韩国版PFW量表的改编为韩国的研究人员和从业者提供了一种有价值的工具,因为在韩国不存在测量个人主观财务状况的工具。