Suppr超能文献

波特假说的证据:中国的资源税法可能是实现企业可持续发展的一条途径。

Evidence on the Porter hypothesis: China's Resource Tax Law may be a path to achieve corporate sustainable development.

作者信息

Zhang Xiaoqi, He Yu

机构信息

School of Finance, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Nan'an District, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 May 30;20(5):e0323668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323668. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Promoting utilization efficiency and sustainable energy development is crucial for achieving sustainable social development in China, the largest energy producer and consumer worldwide. Accordingly, the Chinese authorities enacted the Resource Tax Law (RTL) on August 26, 2019. Whether such a policy can achieve its desired goals has not been verified. Thus, our study applies a difference-in-differences approach to examine the effect of RTL on a firm's energy efficiency (EE) with panel data of A-shares from 2017 to 2022. Benchmark analysis and robustness tests demonstrate RTL's significant effect on resource-based firm's EE. Additional tests deeply explore the policy effect under different situations. First, RTL boosts more for firms with higher initial EE levels than those with lower levels. Second, RTL enhances EE by promoting firms' research and development investments, confirming the existence of the Porter hypothesis in China. Third, this policy shows a stronger positive effect on firms with political connections than those without. Finally, we detect that RTL has no significant impact in the western region, while its effect is significantly stronger in the middle region compared to the eastern region. Our empirical findings suggest that corporate firms and the government should adopt appropriate actions to enhance RTL's policy effect.

摘要

提高利用效率和促进可持续能源发展对于中国这个全球最大的能源生产国和消费国实现可持续社会发展至关重要。因此,中国政府于2019年8月26日颁布了《资源税法》(RTL)。该政策是否能实现预期目标尚未得到验证。因此,我们的研究采用双重差分法,利用2017年至2022年A股的面板数据来检验资源税法对企业能源效率(EE)的影响。基准分析和稳健性检验证明了资源税法对资源型企业能源效率有显著影响。进一步的检验深入探讨了不同情况下的政策效果。首先,与初始能源效率水平较低的企业相比,资源税法对初始能源效率水平较高的企业的促进作用更大。其次,资源税法通过促进企业的研发投入来提高能源效率,证实了波特假说在中国的存在。第三,该政策对有政治关联的企业的积极影响比对无政治关联的企业更强。最后,我们发现资源税法在西部地区没有显著影响,而与东部地区相比,其在中部地区的影响显著更强。我们的实证结果表明,企业和政府应采取适当行动来增强资源税法的政策效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1998/12124751/d41e2d88777d/pone.0323668.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence on the Porter hypothesis: China's Resource Tax Law may be a path to achieve corporate sustainable development.
PLoS One. 2025 May 30;20(5):e0323668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323668. eCollection 2025.
2
What is the role of resource tax in sustainable development? A firm-level analysis for China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):52227-52240. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25976-9. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
4
Carbon information disclosure and corporate financial performance-Empirical evidence based on heavily polluting industries in China.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 17;20(1):e0313638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313638. eCollection 2025.
5
How do environmental taxes affect the environmental investment of high-emission enterprises: Evidence from China.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122629. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122629. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
6
Green innovation and political embeddedness in China's heavily polluted industry: role of environmental disclosure, gender diversity, and enterprise growth.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(43):97498-97517. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29339-2. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
8
The effects of capital-biased tax incentives on firm energy intensity: Environmental dividend or consequence?
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118507. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118507. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
9
The impact of environmental tax laws on heavy-polluting enterprise ESG performance: A stakeholder behavior perspective.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 15;344:118578. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118578. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
10
Environmental regulation and corporate tax avoidance:A quasi-natural experiments study based on China's new environmental protection law.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Oct 15;296:113160. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113160. Epub 2021 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental regulation, industrial structure and energy efficiency: Evidence from 30 provinces in China.
PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0299731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299731. eCollection 2024.
2
Effectiveness evaluation of China's water resource tax reform pilot and path optimization from the perspective of policy field.
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0301031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301031. eCollection 2024.
3
Evaluating the energy efficiency-enhancing potential of the digital economy: Evidence from China.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 15;344:118408. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118408. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
5
Can the marketization of urban land transfer improve energy efficiency?
J Environ Manage. 2023 Mar 1;329:117126. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117126. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
6
Does the Emission Trading Scheme achieve the dual dividend of reducing pollution and improving energy efficiency? Micro evidence from China.
J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 1;323:116202. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116202. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
7
How do environmental regulations affect carbon emission and energy efficiency patterns? A provincial-level analysis of Chinese energy-intensive industries.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(3):3446-3462. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15843-w. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
8
Does market segmentation necessarily discourage energy efficiency?
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233061. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验