• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让肿瘤学家参与数字健康行为改变干预的低负担电子健康记录策略:定性访谈研究

Low-Burden Electronic Health Record Strategies for Engaging Oncologists in Digital Health Behavior Change Interventions: Qualitative Interview Study.

作者信息

Jayeoba Monisola, Scherr Courtney L, Carroll Allison J, Daly Elyse, Kerstiens Savanna, Phillips Siobhan M, Hitsman Brian, Garcia Sofia F, Spring Bonnie, Jacobs Maia

机构信息

Department of Communication Studies, School of Communication, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States.

Department of Computer Science, McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 30;27:e65975. doi: 10.2196/65975.

DOI:10.2196/65975
PMID:40446287
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12166325/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health behavior change interventions play an important role in helping cancer survivors improve their quality of life and reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. Clinician-patient communication is central to promoting the uptake of and adherence to digital health behavior change interventions. However, oncologists face significant barriers, including time constraints, knowledge gaps, and conversational uneasiness that limit risk behavior and health behavior change conversations.

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative study aims to explore oncologists' preferences for discussing and monitoring risk behaviors with cancer survivors, with a specific focus on conversations about digital health behavior change interventions. This study also aims to explore oncologists' informational and technological support requirements to facilitate these conversations.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured interviews with 18 oncologists who provide cancer care in a large National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. The transcripts and interview notes were analyzed through an iterative thematic analysis to generate relevant themes and categories.

RESULTS

We identified 2 major themes with 7 subthemes. The first theme focused on oncologists' desired roles in promoting health behavior change, while the second theme addressed the support needs to facilitate conversations about risk and health promotion. Oncologists expressed a desire for 2 action-oriented communication mechanisms for promoting digital health behavior change with their patients: referring patients to interventions and reinforcing intervention goals longitudinally. To facilitate risk behavior and health behavior change conversations, their support needs included a preference for low-burden, electronic health record-integrated tools providing timely updates on patient enrollment and progress. The participating oncologists requested a tailored conversation aid for patient communication and parallel systems combining electronic health record messaging with print materials. They also emphasized the need for automated recommender systems to identify and refer eligible patients and reminder systems to prompt timely discussions with patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncologists are motivated and well-positioned to support patients' health behavior change but have unmet informational and technological requirements. On the basis of oncologists' perspectives, our findings provide actionable, user-centered, low-burden strategies for facilitating oncologist-patient conversations about digital health behavior change interventions. We make recommendations for integrating these strategies directly into the electronic medical record system, with the goal of amplifying oncologists' influential roles in motivating health behavior change among survivors. These scalable strategies may be applicable beyond oncology to clinical contexts where greater promotion of patients' health behavior change is desired.

摘要

背景

数字健康行为改变干预措施在帮助癌症幸存者提高生活质量和降低癌症复发风险方面发挥着重要作用。医患沟通是促进数字健康行为改变干预措施的采用和坚持的核心。然而,肿瘤学家面临着重大障碍,包括时间限制、知识差距和对话不安,这些都限制了风险行为和健康行为改变方面的对话。

目的

这项定性研究旨在探讨肿瘤学家在与癌症幸存者讨论和监测风险行为方面的偏好,特别关注关于数字健康行为改变干预措施的对话。本研究还旨在探讨肿瘤学家促进这些对话所需的信息和技术支持。

方法

我们对在一家大型国立癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心提供癌症护理的18名肿瘤学家进行了半结构化访谈。通过迭代主题分析对访谈记录和笔记进行分析,以生成相关主题和类别。

结果

我们确定了2个主要主题和7个子主题。第一个主题关注肿瘤学家在促进健康行为改变方面期望发挥的作用,而第二个主题涉及促进风险和健康促进对话所需的支持。肿瘤学家表示希望有两种以行动为导向的沟通机制来促进与患者的数字健康行为改变:将患者转介至干预措施并纵向强化干预目标。为了促进风险行为和健康行为改变方面的对话,他们需要的支持包括倾向于低负担、与电子健康记录集成的工具,这些工具能及时提供患者登记和进展情况的最新信息。参与研究的肿瘤学家要求提供针对患者沟通的定制对话辅助工具,以及将电子健康记录信息与印刷材料相结合的并行系统。他们还强调需要自动化推荐系统来识别和转介符合条件的患者,以及提醒系统来促使及时与患者进行讨论。

结论

肿瘤学家有动力且处于有利位置来支持患者的健康行为改变,但他们未得到满足的信息和技术需求。基于肿瘤学家的观点,我们的研究结果提供了可操作的、以用户为中心的、低负担的策略,以促进医患关于数字健康行为改变干预措施的对话。我们建议将这些策略直接整合到电子病历系统中,目的是增强肿瘤学家在激励幸存者改变健康行为方面的影响力。这些可扩展的策略可能适用于肿瘤学之外的临床环境,在这些环境中更希望促进患者的健康行为改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bddd/12166325/7449cc6579a3/jmir_v27i1e65975_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bddd/12166325/7449cc6579a3/jmir_v27i1e65975_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bddd/12166325/7449cc6579a3/jmir_v27i1e65975_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Low-Burden Electronic Health Record Strategies for Engaging Oncologists in Digital Health Behavior Change Interventions: Qualitative Interview Study.让肿瘤学家参与数字健康行为改变干预的低负担电子健康记录策略:定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 30;27:e65975. doi: 10.2196/65975.
2
Speaking of survival: oncologists' approaches to risk behavior conversations with cancer survivors.说到生存:肿瘤学家与癌症幸存者进行风险行为谈话的方法。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01798-1.
3
Patients' and oncologists' views on family involvement in goals of care conversations.患者和肿瘤医生对家属参与目标关怀谈话的看法。
Psychooncology. 2018 Mar;27(3):1035-1041. doi: 10.1002/pon.4630. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
4
Preferences for Communication About Prognosis Among Children With Cancer, Parents, and Oncologists.癌症患儿、家长及肿瘤学家对预后沟通的偏好
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255431. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5431.
5
OpenNotes in oncology: oncologists' perceptions and a baseline of the content and style of their clinician notes.肿瘤学中的开放医嘱:肿瘤医生的看法,以及他们临床医嘱内容和风格的基准。
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Mar 1;9(2):347-356. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby029.
6
Increasing challenges of general practitioner-oncologist interaction in end-of-life communication: a qualitative study.临终沟通中全科医生与肿瘤学家互动面临的挑战日益增加:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Feb 20;24(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01690-w.
7
Patients' and oncologists' views on how oncologists may best address patients' emotions during consultations: An interview study.患者和肿瘤医生对肿瘤医生在咨询中如何最好地处理患者情绪的看法:一项访谈研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jul;101(7):1223-1231. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
8
Oncologists' and Patients' Perceptions of Initial, Intermediate, and Final Goals of Care Conversations.肿瘤医生和患者对初始、中期和终期医疗照护目标对话的看法。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Mar;55(3):890-896. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.09.024. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
9
Oncologists' Perceptions of Strategies for Discussing the Cost of Care with Cancer Patients and the Meaning of Those Conversations.肿瘤学家对与癌症患者讨论医疗费用策略的看法,以及这些对话的意义。
Health Commun. 2024 Jun;39(7):1343-1357. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2212419. Epub 2023 May 15.
10
Facilitators and Barriers to Oncologists' Conduct of Goals of Care Conversations.肿瘤学家进行照护目标沟通的促进因素与障碍
J Palliat Care. 2018 Jul;33(3):143-148. doi: 10.1177/0825859718777361. Epub 2018 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Scalable Telehealth Cancer Care: integrated healthy lifestyle program to live well after cancer treatment.可扩展的远程医疗癌症护理:综合健康生活方式计划,帮助癌症治疗后更好地生活。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2024 Jun 26;2024(64):83-91. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae020.
2
AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems: An Ongoing Pursuit of Potential.人工智能驱动的临床决策支持系统:对潜力的持续追求。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 6;16(4):e57728. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57728. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: challenges and opportunities.
利用临床决策支持系统的力量:挑战与机遇。
Open Heart. 2023 Nov 28;10(2):e002432. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002432.
4
Effective Behavior Change Techniques in Digital Health Interventions for the Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: An Umbrella Review.数字健康干预措施预防或管理非传染性疾病的有效行为改变技术:伞式综述。
Ann Behav Med. 2023 Sep 13;57(10):817-835. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaad041.
5
Perspectives on the Intersection of Electronic Health Records and Health Care Team Communication, Function, and Well-being.电子健康记录与医疗保健团队沟通、功能和福祉的交集视角。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2313178. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13178.
6
A systematic review of digital interventions for smoking cessation in patients with serious mental illness.系统评价数字化干预措施在有严重精神疾病的患者中戒烟的效果。
Psychol Med. 2023 Aug;53(11):4856-4868. doi: 10.1017/S003329172300123X. Epub 2023 May 10.
7
Evaluating Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake of mHealth Apps in Cancer Care Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: Scoping Literature Review.使用实施研究综合框架评估癌症护理中移动健康应用程序采用的障碍和促进因素:范围综述文献
JMIR Cancer. 2023 Mar 30;9:e42092. doi: 10.2196/42092.
8
Prevalence of health behaviors among cancer survivors in the United States.美国癌症幸存者健康行为的流行率。
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Jun;18(3):1042-1050. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01347-8. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
9
Electronic Medical Record-Based Electronic Messaging Among Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.基于电子病历的乳腺癌患者间电子信息交流:系统评价。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Jan;14(1):134-143. doi: 10.1055/a-2004-6669. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
10
Automated Digital Interventions and Smoking Cessation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Relating Efficiency to a Psychological Theory of Intervention Perspective.自动化数字干预与戒烟:与干预心理理论视角相关的效率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 16;24(11):e38206. doi: 10.2196/38206.