Ferrari Davide, Violante Tommaso, Sassun Richard, Sileo Annaclara, Novelli Marco, Perry William R, Mathis Kellie L, Rumer Kristen K, Behm Kevin T, Larson David W
Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Orsi Academy, Melle, Belgium; Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Aug;29(8):102096. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102096. Epub 2025 May 28.
The evolution of enhanced recovery pathways in colorectal surgery has enabled same-day discharge (SDD) in various procedures. Although early discharge after diverting loop ileostomy closure was first described in 2003, its adoption remains limited. This study aimed to analyze national trends in outpatient stoma closure; compare outcomes between SDD, short-stay (SS), and traditional inpatient (IP) protocols; and identify factors associated with safe early discharge.
A retrospective analysis using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was conducted. Patients who underwent elective stoma closure were included. The study population was divided into SDD (length of stay [LOS] of 0 days), SS (LOS of 1 day), and IP (LOS of ≥2 days) groups. The outcomes were analyzed using unadjusted, multivariate, and propensity score-matched analyses.
From 2017 to 2022, 22,312 patients were included: 201 (0.9%) in the SDD group, 1833 (8.2%) in the SS group, and 20,278 (90.9%) in the IP group. Overall morbidity was significantly lower in expedited discharge groups (7.0% in the SDD group vs 6.0% in the SS group vs 11.8% in the IP group; P <.001). After propensity score matching, both SDD and SS groups showed comparable safety outcomes, whereas the IP group had significantly higher reoperation rates. No differences in readmission rates were observed between the groups. American Society of Anesthesiologists class > III, smoking status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, steroid use, and dependent functional status were identified as independent risk factors for adverse outcomes.
Both SDD and SS discharge protocols for stoma closure are safe in appropriately selected patients. Despite evidence supporting their safety, their adoption remains limited. The identification of specific risk factors guides patient selection and suggests substantial opportunity for expanding the implementation of outpatient protocols.
结直肠手术中强化康复路径的发展已使多种手术能够实现当日出院(SDD)。尽管2003年首次报道了转流性袢状回肠造口关闭术后的早期出院情况,但其应用仍然有限。本研究旨在分析门诊造口关闭的全国趋势;比较当日出院、短期住院(SS)和传统住院(IP)方案的结局;并确定与安全早期出院相关的因素。
使用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库进行回顾性分析。纳入接受择期造口关闭的患者。研究人群分为当日出院组(住院时间[LOS]为0天)、短期住院组(LOS为1天)和传统住院组(LOS≥2天)。使用未调整分析、多变量分析和倾向评分匹配分析来分析结局。
2017年至2022年,共纳入22312例患者:当日出院组201例(0.9%),短期住院组1833例(8.2%),传统住院组20278例(90.9%)。快速出院组的总体并发症发生率显著更低(当日出院组为7.0%,短期住院组为6.0%,传统住院组为11.8%;P<.001)。倾向评分匹配后,当日出院组和短期住院组的安全结局相当,而传统住院组的再次手术率显著更高。各组之间的再入院率未观察到差异。美国麻醉医师协会分级>III级、吸烟状况、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、使用类固醇和依赖性功能状态被确定为不良结局的独立危险因素。
对于经过适当选择的患者,造口关闭的当日出院和短期住院出院方案都是安全的。尽管有证据支持其安全性,但其应用仍然有限。识别特定的危险因素可指导患者选择,并提示扩大门诊方案实施的巨大机会。