Jia Shuobo, Wang Xiaoyue, Deng Chunxia, Zhang Bohao, Han Rongwei, Du Qijing, Jiang Hongning, Guo Tongjun, Bu Dengpan, Yang Yongxin
College of Food Science and Engineering, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, Shandong, China.
College of Food Science and Engineering, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, Shandong, China; National Center of Technology Innovation for Dairy, Hohhot 010080, Inner Mongolia, China.
J Dairy Sci. 2025 Aug;108(8):8012-8026. doi: 10.3168/jds.2025-26645. Epub 2025 May 28.
Specialty milks, known for their distinct nutritional profiles and expensive pricing, have received increased attention as a result of worries over their adulteration with cow milk. This study used capillary electrophoresis to detect cow milk adulteration (2%, 5%, 10%, 30%, and 50%) in raw, pasteurized, freeze-dried, and spray-dried forms of 7 specialty milks (buffalo, yak, goat, sheep, camel, horse, and donkey) and to identify particular markers derived from cow components. Cow α-CN, β-CN A1, β-LG, and α-LA were identified as potential markers for detecting cow milk adulteration in specific milk types, based on their retention times. Among these, α-CN was capable of detecting 2% cow milk adulteration in raw sheep, camel, and horse milks, and 5% adulteration in raw buffalo, goat, and donkey milks. β-LG, on the other hand, detected 5% cow milk adulteration in raw goat and camel milks, and 30% adulteration in raw horse and donkey milks. The detection limit for α-CN, and β-LG in freeze-dried milk powder remained unaltered compared with raw milk. However, the detection limit increased in pasteurized and spray-dried forms, which was connected with particular milk markers. α-CN and β-LG from cow and specific milk were characterized following separation, revealing significant differences in particle size and surface hydrophobicity between cows and specific species. These variations contributed to differences in the retention times observed during capillary electrophoresis analysis. This study laid the groundwork for using capillary electrophoresis to detect adulteration in specialized milks and their processed products, providing useful insights into the physicochemical features of potential markers.
特种奶因其独特的营养成分和高昂的价格而闻名,由于人们担心其被牛奶掺假,因此受到了越来越多的关注。本研究采用毛细管电泳法检测7种特种奶(水牛奶、牦牛奶、山羊奶、绵羊奶、骆驼奶、马奶和驴奶)的生奶、巴氏杀菌奶、冻干奶和喷雾干燥奶中牛奶掺假情况(2%、5%、10%、30%和50%),并鉴定源自奶牛成分的特定标志物。根据牛α-酪蛋白(α-CN)、β-酪蛋白A1(β-CN A1)、β-乳球蛋白(β-LG)和α-乳白蛋白(α-LA)的保留时间,将它们鉴定为检测特定奶种中牛奶掺假的潜在标志物。其中,α-CN能够检测出生羊乳、骆驼乳和马乳中2%的牛奶掺假,以及生水牛奶、山羊奶和驴奶中5%的掺假。另一方面,β-LG检测出生山羊奶和骆驼奶中5%的牛奶掺假,以及生马奶和驴奶中30%的掺假。与生鲜奶相比,冻干奶粉中α-CN和β-LG的检测限保持不变。然而,巴氏杀菌奶和喷雾干燥奶中的检测限有所提高,这与特定的奶标志物有关。分离后对牛和特定奶中的α-CN和β-LG进行了表征,结果表明牛与特定物种之间在粒径和表面疏水性方面存在显著差异。这些差异导致了毛细管电泳分析过程中观察到的保留时间不同。本研究为利用毛细管电泳检测特种奶及其加工产品中的掺假奠定了基础,为潜在标志物的物理化学特征提供了有用的见解。