Collins Andrew P, Gregory John, Whitson Anastasia J, Matsen Frederick A, Hsu Jason E, Schiffman Corey J
Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.04.016.
A principal goal of shoulder arthroplasty is to achieve patient satisfaction. While patient self-assessment of shoulder function is commonly used to assess operative success, it is not known how improvements in shoulder function correlate with patient satisfaction after primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), and ream-and-run (RnR) arthroplasty. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the preoperative to postoperative improvement in the individual functions assessed by the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) for patients having aTSA, rTSA, and RnR arthroplasty and (2) to relate these improvements to patient satisfaction after each of these 3 arthroplasty types.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of a longitudinally maintained arthroplasty database from a single academic center. Patients undergoing aTSA, rTSA, and RnR arthroplasty with a minimum of 2-year follow-up data were included for analysis. Patients having arthroplasty for fracture and revision arthroplasty were not included. Preoperative SST scores and patient satisfaction questionnaires were obtained and compared with 2-year postoperative data. Patients who improved from neutral or negative satisfaction scores to positive scores on the questionnaire were determined to be "satisfied," while others were "unsatisfied." Individual SST questions were analyzed by arthroplasty type with receiver operator characteristic curves to determine their relationship to patient satisfaction.
In total, 1,048 patients were included. Of them, 468 (44.7%) underwent aTSA, 164 (15.6%) rTSA, and 416 (39.7%) RnR arthroplasty. Patients undergoing aTSA and RnR arthroplasty had higher rates of overall satisfaction at 2 years compared with rTSA patients (83.5% and 80.5% compared with 68.9%, respectively, P < .001). Shoulder comfort while sleeping demonstrated the highest or second Youden index (metric of the best-fit curve based on maximization of sensitivity and specificity) across all 3 arthroplasty types. Shoulder comfort at rest demonstrated high positive predictive value in all cohorts. The relationship of the other SST functions to patient satisfaction varied among the 3 arthroplasty types.
For all shoulder arthroplasty types, patient comfort with the arm at rest and the ability to sleep comfortably were strongly related to patient satisfaction at 2 years after surgery. The relationship between satisfaction and the other shoulder functions varied among the different types of arthroplasties. The results of this study may be useful in setting expectations for patients having shoulder joint replacement.
肩关节置换术的一个主要目标是实现患者满意度。虽然患者对肩部功能的自我评估通常用于评估手术成功率,但在初次解剖型全肩关节置换术(aTSA)、反式全肩关节置换术(rTSA)和扩髓并植入(RnR)关节成形术后,肩部功能的改善与患者满意度之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是:(1)确定接受aTSA、rTSA和RnR关节成形术的患者在简单肩关节测试(SST)评估的各项功能上术前至术后的改善情况;(2)将这些改善情况与这三种关节成形术各自术后的患者满意度相关联。
我们对来自单一学术中心的纵向维护的关节置换术数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究。纳入至少有2年随访数据的接受aTSA、rTSA和RnR关节成形术的患者进行分析。因骨折接受关节成形术和翻修关节成形术的患者未纳入。获取术前SST评分和患者满意度问卷,并与术后2年的数据进行比较。问卷中从中性或负面满意度评分提高到正面评分的患者被确定为“满意”,其他患者为“不满意”。通过绘制接受者操作特征曲线,按关节成形术类型分析SST的各个问题,以确定它们与患者满意度的关系。
总共纳入了1048例患者。其中,468例(44.7%)接受了aTSA,164例(15.6%)接受了rTSA,416例(39.7%)接受了RnR关节成形术。与接受rTSA的患者相比,接受aTSA和RnR关节成形术的患者在术后2年的总体满意度更高(分别为83.5%和80.5%,而rTSA患者为68.9%,P <.001)。在所有三种关节成形术类型中,睡眠时的肩部舒适度显示出最高或第二高的约登指数(基于敏感性和特异性最大化的最佳拟合曲线指标)。静息时的肩部舒适度在所有队列中均显示出较高的阳性预测价值。SST的其他功能与患者满意度的关系在三种关节成形术类型中各不相同。
对于所有类型的肩关节置换术,患者静息时手臂的舒适度和舒适睡眠的能力与术后2年的患者满意度密切相关。满意度与其他肩部功能之间的关系在不同类型的关节成形术中各不相同。本研究结果可能有助于为接受肩关节置换术的患者设定预期。