Ahrensberg Hannah, Ekholm Ola, Andersen Susan, Kurita Geana Paula, Jensen Per Føge, Ahlmark Nanna Gram
National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Respiratory Support, Rigshospitalet, Ole Maaløes Vej 26, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Section of Palliative Medicine, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Pain. 2025 Aug;33:105451. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105451. Epub 2025 May 28.
Chronic non-cancer pain drives many to seek complementary and alternative medicine, yet its usage remains poorly understood. This study aimed assessing trends in complementary and alternative medicine use and its association with conventional healthcare use among chronic non-cancer pain individuals. It is a repeated cross-sectional study using population data (≥16 years) from the Danish Health and Morbidity Surveys (2000, 2005, 2010, 2013, 2017, 2021; n=86,052). The surveys' questions on complementary and alternative medicine types (ever use; 12 months use) and chronic non-cancer pain (≥6 months) were linked to information from the Danish National Health Service Register. Results showed an increase in 12-month complementary and alternative medicine use from 29.9% in 2000 to 35.8% in 2010 among chronic non-cancer pain individuals, and from 19.4% to 23.1% among those without chronic non-cancer pain. Between 2010 and 2017, a stagnation was observed, followed by a decrease in 2021 (31.0% among chronic non-cancer pain individuals and 20.6% among those without). Massage and other manipulative therapies were the most frequently used among chronic non-cancer pain individuals, with the 12-month prevalence increasing from 16.7% in 2005 to 25.0% in 2010 and then remaining stable. Complementary and alternative medicine users with chronic non-cancer pain had more GP consultations, visits to physiotherapists, and chiropractors within the past 12 months compared to those not using complementary and alternative medicine and without chronic non-cancer pain. In conclusion, complementary and alternative medicine may aid chronic pain management, but further research is needed for safe integration into healthcare systems. PERSPECTIVE: There is a high prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use, alongside conventional care among individuals with chronic non-cancer pain. Complementary and alternative medicine's effects and potential role in chronic pain management deserve further exploration to assess the potential for safe and effective integration with conventional treatments.
慢性非癌性疼痛促使许多人寻求补充和替代医学,但其使用情况仍未得到充分了解。本研究旨在评估慢性非癌性疼痛患者使用补充和替代医学的趋势及其与传统医疗使用的关联。这是一项重复横断面研究,使用了丹麦健康与发病率调查(2000年、2005年、2010年、2013年、2017年、2021年;n = 86,052)中的人群数据(≥16岁)。调查中关于补充和替代医学类型(曾经使用;过去12个月使用)以及慢性非癌性疼痛(≥6个月)的问题与丹麦国家卫生服务登记处的信息相关联。结果显示,在慢性非癌性疼痛患者中,过去12个月使用补充和替代医学的比例从2000年的29.9%增至2010年的35.8%,在无慢性非癌性疼痛的人群中,这一比例从19.4%增至23.1%。在2010年至2017年期间,出现了停滞,随后在2021年有所下降(慢性非癌性疼痛患者中为31.0%,无慢性非癌性疼痛患者中为20.6%)。按摩和其他手法治疗是慢性非癌性疼痛患者中最常用的方法,过去12个月的患病率从2005年的16.7%增至2010年的25.0%,然后保持稳定。与未使用补充和替代医学且无慢性非癌性疼痛的患者相比,患有慢性非癌性疼痛的补充和替代医学使用者在过去12个月内看全科医生、物理治疗师和脊椎按摩师的次数更多。总之,补充和替代医学可能有助于慢性疼痛管理,但需要进一步研究以安全地融入医疗保健系统。观点:在患有慢性非癌性疼痛的个体中,补充和替代医学的使用与传统医疗并存的情况很普遍。补充和替代医学在慢性疼痛管理中的作用和潜在作用值得进一步探索,以评估其与传统治疗安全有效整合的潜力。