• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Incidence of cognitive errors in difficult airway management: an inference human factors study from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry.困难气道管理中认知错误的发生率:一项来自儿科困难插管登记处的人为因素推断性研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Nov;135(5):1499-1510. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.033. Epub 2025 May 29.
2
Awake Supraglottic Airway Placement in Pediatric Patients for Airway Obstruction or Difficult Intubation: Insights From an International Airway Registry (PeDI).儿科患者因气道阻塞或困难插管而进行的清醒声门上气道置入:来自国际气道注册研究(PeDI)的见解
Anesth Analg. 2025 Feb 1;140(2):310-316. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006959. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
3
Paediatric difficult intubations and the impact of timing of weekend versus weekday cases: an analysis of the Pediatric Difficult Intubation registry.儿科困难插管以及周末与工作日病例时间的影响:儿科困难插管登记研究分析
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.07.033.
4
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
5
Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents.在成人和青少年气管插管或直接喉镜检查期间,避免使用与使用神经肌肉阻滞剂以改善操作条件的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 17;5(5):CD009237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009237.pub2.
6
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation.针对需要气管插管的成年患者,视频喉镜检查与直接喉镜检查的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2.
7
Combined videolaryngoscopy and flexible bronchoscopy for difficult tracheal intubation in children: a retrospective observational cohort study.联合视频喉镜和可弯曲支气管镜用于儿童困难气管插管:一项回顾性观察队列研究
Anaesthesia. 2025 Sep;80(9):1057-1064. doi: 10.1111/anae.16624. Epub 2025 May 22.
8
Airway Management in Children Undergoing Cleft Lip or Cleft Palate Surgery: An 8-Year Retrospective Analysis of 274 Cases.唇腭裂手术患儿的气道管理:274例病例的8年回顾性分析
Paediatr Anaesth. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1111/pan.70038.
9
Airway physical examination tests for detection of difficult airway management in apparently normal adult patients.气道体格检查用于检测表面上正常的成年患者的困难气道管理情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 15;5(5):CD008874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008874.pub2.
10
Supraglottic airway devices versus tracheal intubation for airway management during general anaesthesia in obese patients.肥胖患者全身麻醉期间声门上气道装置与气管插管用于气道管理的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 9;2013(9):CD010105. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010105.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Tiny airways, high stakes: What every clinician should know about infant airway management in 2025.微小气道,高风险:2025年每位临床医生应了解的关于婴儿气道管理的知识。
Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Oct;69(10):975-979. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_828_25. Epub 2025 Sep 5.
2
Cognitive errors in paediatric difficult airway management: a step into the unknown.儿科困难气道管理中的认知错误:踏入未知领域。
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Nov;135(5):1394-1396. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.06.002. Epub 2025 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and implementation of local pediatric anesthesia performance metrics at a Canadian children's hospital: a technical report.加拿大儿童医院制定和实施儿科麻醉绩效指标:技术报告。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jul;71(7):944-957. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02763-9. Epub 2024 May 9.
2
Airway management in the paediatric difficult intubation registry: a propensity score matched analysis of outcomes over time.儿科困难插管登记中的气道管理:一项倾向评分匹配的长期结果分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Feb 14;69:102461. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102461. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Navigating a Path Toward Routine Recording in the Operating Room.探寻手术室常规记录之路。
Ann Surg. 2023 Sep 1;278(3):e474-e475. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005906. Epub 2023 May 22.
4
Standardized Anesthesia InductioN Tool (SAINT) - The development and international adoption of an integrated electronic tool for documenting the induction of anesthesia in children.标准化麻醉诱导工具(SAINT)- 开发和国际采用一种集成的电子工具,用于记录儿童麻醉诱导过程。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2023 May;33(5):347-354. doi: 10.1111/pan.14625. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
5
2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway.2022 年美国麻醉医师学会困难气道管理实践指南。
Anesthesiology. 2022 Jan 1;136(1):31-81. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002.
6
Anxiety is associated with extraneous cognitive load during teaching using high-fidelity clinical simulation.在使用高保真临床模拟进行教学时,焦虑与额外的认知负荷有关。
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1994691. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1994691.
7
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomization: The STROBE-MR Statement.加强采用孟德尔随机化的观察性研究报告:STROBE-MR 声明。
JAMA. 2021 Oct 26;326(16):1614-1621. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.18236.
8
Error traps in pediatric difficult airway management.小儿困难气道管理中的失误陷阱。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2021 Dec;31(12):1271-1275. doi: 10.1111/pan.14289. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
9
Difficult tracheal intubation in neonates and infants. NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE): a prospective European multicentre observational study.新生儿和婴儿困难气管插管。新生儿和儿童麻醉实践欧洲听力调查(NECTARINE):一项前瞻性欧洲多中心观察研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jun;126(6):1173-1181. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.02.021. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
10
The Measurement of Individual Differences in Cognitive Biases: A Review and Improvement.认知偏差中个体差异的测量:综述与改进
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 18;12:630177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630177. eCollection 2021.

困难气道管理中认知错误的发生率:一项来自儿科困难插管登记处的人为因素推断性研究。

Incidence of cognitive errors in difficult airway management: an inference human factors study from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry.

作者信息

Bordini Martina, Orsini Luca, Li Simon Y W, Olsen Julia, Stein Mary Lyn, Sarmiento Argüello Lina A, Hesselink Emily B, Lee Angela C, Echeverry Piedad C, Lee Lisa K, O'Brien Elizabeth M, Dalal Priti G, Hunyady Agnes, Whyte Simon, Brooks-Peterson Melissa, Garcia-Marcinkiewicz Annery G, Kovatsis Pete, Peyton James, Von Ungern-Sternberg Britta S, Fiadjoe John, Matava Clyde

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; DIMEC, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; DIMEC, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2025 Nov;135(5):1499-1510. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.033. Epub 2025 May 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.033
PMID:40447486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12597392/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive errors are known contributors to poor decision-making in healthcare. However, their incidence and extent of their contribution to negative outcomes during difficult airway management are unknown. We aimed to identify cognitive errors during paediatric difficult airway management using data from the Pediatric Difficult Intubation (PeDI) registry, to determine patient and clinician factors associated with these errors, and their contribution to complications.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the PeDI registry data including cases with at least three intubation attempts. Cognitive error definitions were adapted to airway management, and predefined clinical endpoints were used to identify cognitive errors. A subanalysis was performed for children weighing <5 kg. Our primary outcome was the overall incidence of cognitive errors. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of specific cognitive error subtypes, associations with patient and clinician factors, and the relationship between cognitive errors and complications.

RESULTS

Cognitive errors were identified in 17.4% (487/2801) of cases, with fixation errors being the most common (11.5%), followed by omission bias (5.9%) and overconfidence bias (4.5%). Non-anaesthesiologist clinicians had the highest odds of cognitive errors. The presence of at least one cognitive error was independently associated with a higher risk of complications (adjusted odds ratio, 1.86 [95% confidence interval, 1.53-2.27]; P<0.001), and multiple errors increased the likelihood of severe complications (adjusted odds ratio, 2.48 [95% confidence interval, 1.24-4.94]; P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive errors occurred in nearly 20% of paediatric difficult airway encounters and were linked to increased complications. Further research should refine error definitions and develop mitigation strategies to improve outcomes.

摘要

背景

认知错误是导致医疗保健决策不佳的已知因素。然而,在困难气道管理过程中,其发生率以及对不良后果的影响程度尚不清楚。我们旨在利用儿科困难插管(PeDI)登记处的数据,识别儿科困难气道管理过程中的认知错误,确定与这些错误相关的患者和临床医生因素,以及它们对并发症的影响。

方法

我们对PeDI登记处的数据进行了回顾性分析,包括至少进行了三次插管尝试的病例。将认知错误的定义应用于气道管理,并使用预先定义的临床终点来识别认知错误。对体重<5kg的儿童进行了亚分析。我们的主要结局是认知错误的总体发生率。次要结局包括特定认知错误亚型的发生率、与患者和临床医生因素的关联,以及认知错误与并发症之间的关系。

结果

在17.4%(487/2801)的病例中发现了认知错误,其中固定错误最为常见(11.5%),其次是遗漏偏差(5.9%)和过度自信偏差(4.5%)。非麻醉科临床医生出现认知错误的几率最高。至少存在一个认知错误与更高的并发症风险独立相关(调整后的优势比,1.86[95%置信区间,1.53 - 2.27];P<0.001),多个错误增加了严重并发症的可能性(调整后的优势比,2.48[95%置信区间,1.24 - 4.94];P = 0.01)。

结论

在近20%的儿科困难气道病例中发生了认知错误,并且与并发症增加有关。进一步的研究应完善错误定义并制定缓解策略以改善结局。