Suppr超能文献

认知偏差中个体差异的测量:综述与改进

The Measurement of Individual Differences in Cognitive Biases: A Review and Improvement.

作者信息

Berthet Vincent

机构信息

Université de Lorraine, 2LPN, F-54000 Nancy, France.

Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne, CNRS UMR 8174, Paris, France.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 18;12:630177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630177. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Individual differences have been neglected in decision-making research on heuristics and cognitive biases. Addressing that issue requires having reliable measures. The author first reviewed the research on the measurement of individual differences in cognitive biases. While reliable measures of a dozen biases are currently available, our review revealed that some measures require improvement and measures of other key biases are still lacking (e.g., confirmation bias). We then conducted empirical work showing that adjustments produced a significant improvement of some measures and that confirmation bias can be reliably measured. Overall, our review and findings highlight that the measurement of individual differences in cognitive biases is still in its infancy. In particular, we suggest that contextualized (in addition to generic) measures need to be improved or developed.

摘要

在关于启发式和认知偏差的决策研究中,个体差异一直被忽视。解决这个问题需要有可靠的测量方法。作者首先回顾了关于认知偏差中个体差异测量的研究。虽然目前已有十几种偏差的可靠测量方法,但我们的综述表明,一些测量方法需要改进,而其他关键偏差的测量方法仍然缺乏(例如,证实性偏差)。然后我们进行了实证研究,结果表明调整显著改善了一些测量方法,并且证实性偏差可以得到可靠测量。总体而言,我们的综述和研究结果凸显出认知偏差中个体差异的测量仍处于起步阶段。特别是,我们建议情境化(除通用测量外)测量方法需要改进或开发。

相似文献

1
The Measurement of Individual Differences in Cognitive Biases: A Review and Improvement.
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 18;12:630177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630177. eCollection 2021.
2
The Impact of Cognitive Biases on Professionals' Decision-Making: A Review of Four Occupational Areas.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 4;12:802439. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.802439. eCollection 2021.
3
Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy.
Med Decis Making. 2015 May;35(4):539-57. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14547740. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
4
The heuristics-and-biases inventory: An open-source tool to explore individual differences in rationality.
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 3;14:1145246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145246. eCollection 2023.
5
Decision making biases in the allied health professions: A systematic scoping review.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0240716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240716. eCollection 2020.
6
Decision-making heuristics and biases across the life span.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Oct;1235:57-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06208.x.
7
Measuring Individual Differences in Decision Biases: Methodological Considerations.
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 19;6:1770. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01770. eCollection 2015.
8
How heuristics and cognitive biases affect vaccination decisions.
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Nov 20;36Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e00136620. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00136620. eCollection 2020.
10
Cognitive biases can affect moral intuitions about cognitive enhancement.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Oct 15;8:195. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00195. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive biases and contextual factors explaining variability in nurses' fall risk judgements: a multi-centre cross-sectional study.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 May 28;8:100356. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100356. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The prodromal individuals' perspective on active recruitment for early detection of α-synucleinopathies.
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2025 May 9;11(1):121. doi: 10.1038/s41531-025-00979-0.
3
A common factor underlying individual differences in confirmation bias.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 13;14(1):27795. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78053-7.
4
Changing Decisions: The Interaction between Framing and Decoy Effects.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Sep 12;13(9):755. doi: 10.3390/bs13090755.
5
Computational meaningfulness as the source of beneficial cognitive biases.
Front Psychol. 2023 May 2;14:1189704. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1189704. eCollection 2023.
6
Assessment of cognitive biases in Augmented Reality: Beyond eye tracking.
J Eye Mov Res. 2022 Dec 30;15(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.15.3.4. eCollection 2022.
7
The heuristics-and-biases inventory: An open-source tool to explore individual differences in rationality.
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 3;14:1145246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145246. eCollection 2023.
8
A reassessment of the Resistance to Framing scale.
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Aug;55(5):2320-2332. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01876-7. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
9
From Cognitive Bias Toward Advanced Computational Intelligence for Smart Infrastructure Monitoring.
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 24;13:846610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846610. eCollection 2022.
10
The Impact of Cognitive Biases on Professionals' Decision-Making: A Review of Four Occupational Areas.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 4;12:802439. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.802439. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision-making competence in older adults: A rosy view from a longitudinal investigation.
Psychol Aging. 2020 Jun;35(4):553-564. doi: 10.1037/pag0000443. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
2
Decision-making competence in schizophrenia.
Schizophr Res. 2020 Jan;215:457-459. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
3
Measuring Individual Differences in Decision Biases: Methodological Considerations.
Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 19;6:1770. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01770. eCollection 2015.
4
Giving Debiasing Away: Can Psychological Research on Correcting Cognitive Errors Promote Human Welfare?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;4(4):390-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01144.x.
5
Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy.
Med Decis Making. 2015 May;35(4):539-57. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14547740. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
6
The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks.
Mem Cognit. 2011 Oct;39(7):1275-89. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1.
7
Measurement properties of the Inventory of Cognitive Bias in Medicine (ICBM).
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 May 28;8:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-20.
8
On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Apr;94(4):672-95. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672.
9
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
10
Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking.
Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1248-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Jul 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验